Abstract
At the end of the first decade of the new millenium, the circumstances for both academic institutions and the marketplace could be easily described as adverse. A global financial crisis had increased pressure on the budgets of universities and on their actual as well as prospective students. Companies that had traditionally supported higher education were struggling with survival. In many cases, public money had been shortened or just distributed over an increasing number of recipients in the last years. In Austria and Germany, the university sector had also experienced a shift toward privatization of state universities and the foundation of private universities. By all means, competition for scarce resources in the academic environment—budgets, excellent staff, and students among others—had increased, forcing higher education institutions to become more market oriented. As in business, agility is demanded for universities if they want to win a competitive edge (Shattock 2000).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Harvard University (comprising the undergraduate college, the graduate schools, other academic bodies, research centers, and affiliated institutions) does not have a formal mission statement.
- 2.
There is extensive literature and discussion on how to measure firm effectiveness in a more appropriate way considering complexity in a firm environment as well. This discussion, however, is not part of the present contribution.
Bibliography
Astin AW (1985) Achieving academic excellence. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Bailom F, Matzler K, Tschemernjak D (2007) Enduring success: what top companies do differently. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120
Cameron K (1978) Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Adm Sci Q 23(4):604–632
Cameron KS (1981) Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. J Acad Manage 24(1):25–47
Cameron KS, Quinn RE (1999) Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Based on the competing values framework. Addison-Wesley, Reading/Mass
Christensen CM, Cook S, Hall T (2005) Marketing malpractice. Harvard Bus Rev 83(12):74–83
Clark BR (1996) Substantive growth and innovative organization: new categories for higher education research. High Educ 32(4):417–430
Clark BR (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Elsevier Science, New York
Clark BR (2003) Sustaining change in universities: continuities in case studies and concepts. Tert Educ Manage 9(2):99–116
Dill DD, Soo M (2005) Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. High Educ 49:495–533
Faulstich P, Graessner G (2008) Aus dem Elfenbeinturm in die Exzellenz-Leuchttürme? Hochschule Weiterbildung 1:12–18
Gaither GH, Nedwek BP, Neal JE (1994) Measuring up: the promises and pitfalls of performance indicators in higher education. Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington
Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. J Strateg Manage 17:109–122
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manage Rev 9(2):193–209
Hefferlin JBL (1969) Dynamics of academic reform. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Hinterhuber HH, Krauthammer E (1998) The leadership wheel: the tasks entrepreneurs and senior executives cannot delegate. Strateg Change 7(3):149–162
Hodsoll F (1998) Measuring for success and failure in government and the arts. J Arts Manage Law Soc 28(3):230–239
Hunter JC (1998) The servant: a simple story about the true essence of leadership. Prima Publishing, Roseville
Kalaitzidakis P, Stengos T, Mamunes TP (2003) Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(6):1346–1366
Kano N (1984) Attractive quality and must be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality) 14(2):147–156 (in Japanese)
O’Shea RP, Allen TJ, Morse KP, O’Gorman C, Roche F (2007) Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts institute of technology experience. RD Manage 37(1):1–16
Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harv Bus Rev 68(3):79–81
Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York
Schein EH (1992) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Schoenberger E (1997) The cultural crisis of the firm. Blackwells, Oxford
Shattock M (2000) Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutional self reliance. Tert Educ Manage 6:93–104
Shattock M (2003) Managing successful universities, SRHE. Oxford University Press, Maidenhead
Taylor J (2001) The impact of performance indicators on the work of university academics: evidence from Australian universities. High Educ Q 55(1):42–61
Taylor P (1998) Institutional change in uncertain times: lone ranging is not enough. Stud High Educ 28(3):269–279
Taylor P, Braddock R (2007) International university ranking systems and the idea of university excellence. J High Educ Policy Manage 29(3):245–260
Van Raan AFJ (2005) Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 62(1):133–143
von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Manage Sci 32(7):791–805
Voss ZG, Voss GB (2000) Exploring the impact of organizational values and strategic orientation on performance in the nonprofit professional theatre industry. Int J Arts Manage 3(1):62–76
Additional Materials
California Insitute of Technology (online) At a glance. http://www.caltech.edu/at-a-glance/, 25 May 2009
City University London (online) Introducing city university London. http://www.city.ac.uk/aboutcity/introduction.html, 25 May 2009
Harvard College (1997) The mission of Harvard college. http://www.harvard.edu/siteguide/faqs/faq110.php, 25 May 2009
HEFCE (2007) Review of performance indicators: outcomes and decisions. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2007/07_14/07_14.pdf
London School of Economics (online) Mission statement and target performance standards. http://ww.lse.ac.uk/collections/researchAndProjectDevelopmentDivision/missionStatement.htm, 25 May 2009
TUM-Tech GmbH (2003) Universität der Zukunft. Eine Vision—Handlungs- und Ordnungsprinzipien für Universitätsinstitutionen in Deutschland. http://www.tumtech.de/_resources/dynamic/hauptbereich/konzepte_und_expertisen/studie_universitaet_der_zukunft.pdf, (15 Jan 2009)
University of Cambridge (online) The university’s mission and core values. http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/univ/mission.html, (25 May 2009)
University of St. Gallen (online) Unique selling proposition. http://www.ifm.unisg.ch/org/ifm/dv.nsf/wwwPubInhalteGer/Unique+Selling+Proposition?opendocument, (25 May 2009)
ZEIT (2009) CHE Hochschulranking 2009/10. http://ranking.zeit.de/che10/CHE, (25 May 2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matzler, K., Abfalter, D. (2012). Learning From the Best: Implications From Successful Companies for Higher Education Management. In: Altmann, A., Ebersberger, B. (eds) Universities in Change. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4590-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4590-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4589-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4590-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)