Abstract
Are there differences in the range of processing complexity for fire versus EMS calls for aid? Are there differences in the efficiency of processing algorithms for fire versus EMS calls for aid? Does the nature and complexity of calls vary by time of day?
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
-
Are there differences in the range of processing complexity for fire versus EMS calls for aid?
-
Are there differences in the efficiency of processing algorithms for fire versus EMS calls for aid?
-
Does the nature and complexity of calls vary by time of day?
-
Are fire versus EMS calls for aid similarly classified and processed as “emergency” responses?
-
How much transmission delay is typically introduced between dispatcher initiation and ERF notification of an alarm?
-
How does advanced technology impact alarm handling times?
-
CAD to CAD interfaces among PSAPs and response agencies
-
Enhanced mapping data/software
-
Call taker/Dispatcher workflow analysis
-
-
How does the method of alarm notification affect ERU crew turnout times?
-
Automated dispatch messaging/locution systems
-
-
What are the variations in ERU crew turnout times based on the perceived severity of the emergency?
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Fire Protection Research Foundation
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Upson, R., Notarianni, K.A. (2010). Future Study Questions. In: Quantitative Evaluation of Fire and EMS Mobilization Times. SpringerBriefs in Fire. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4442-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4442-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4441-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4442-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)