Skip to main content

Assessing Leadership Performance in University-Based Cooperative Research Centers: Evidence from Four Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation

Abstract

This chapter describes a program of research investigating leadership in the context of university-based cooperative research centers (URCs). S. Bartholomew Craig, Clara E. Hess, Jennifer Lindberg McGinnis, and Denis O. Gray report the results of four studies. Study 1 used content analysis of qualitative interview data to identify 15 categories of center director performance. Study 2 used the categories identified in Study 1 to create a standardized multisource (360°) leadership performance assessment instrument, which was subsequently refined to measure ten dimensions of directors’ leadership performance. Study 3 applied cluster analysis to scores from the new instrument to identify four distinct “types” of center directors, based on their patterns of leadership performance. Study 4 investigated the relations between center directors’ leadership performance and their personality scores as assessed with the Five Factor Model of personality. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for knowledge of leadership processes within URCs, selection and development of center directors, and for future research efforts. For complementary examinations, see the chapters by Rivers and Gray and by Davis and colleagues on center leaders’ industry member marketing practices and relations with university administrators, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews FM, Farris GF (1967) Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Pers Psychol 20:497–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basadur M, Runco MA, Vega LA (2000) Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behaviors work together: a causal process model. J Creative Behav 34:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman C (2012) Organizational capital in boundary-spanning collaborations: internal and external approaches to organizational structure and personnel authority. J Public Admin Res Theory 22(3):497–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman C, Bozeman B (2007) Role strain in university research centers. J High Educ 78:430–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal LB (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ Sci 12:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charan R, Drotter S, Noel J (2000) The leadership pipeline: how to build the leadership powered company. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W, Florida R, Goe WR (1994) University-industry research centers in the United States. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig SB, Hess CE, McGinnis JL, Gray DO (2009) Leadership in university-based cooperative research centres. Ind High Educ 23:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, Goodman PS (1997) Creating effective university-industry alliances: an organizational learning perspective. Organ Dyn 25:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL (1978) A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Acad Manage J 21:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudeck SZ, Hall WB (1991) Personality consistency: eminent architects 25 years later. Creativity Res J 4:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins T, Keller RT (2003) Leadership in research and development organizations: a literature review and conceptual framework. Leadership Quart 14:587–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris GF (1988) Technical leadership: much discussed but little understood. Res Technol Manage 31:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman EA, Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Levin KY, Korotkin AL, Hein MB (1991) Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: a synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quart 2:245–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski RT, Billingsley K, Yeager S (1976) Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: types of change generated by OD designs. J Appl Behav Sci 12:133–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DO (1998) Creating win-win partnerships. In: Gray D, Walters S (eds) Managing the industry/university cooperative research center: a guide for directors and other stakeholders. Battelle, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray DO, Sundstrom E, Tornatzky LG, McGovern L (2011) When triple helix unravels: a multi-case analysis of failures in industry-university cooperative research centres. Ind High Educ 25:333–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge WQ, Fryxell GE, Dooley RS (1997) The new task of R&D management: creating goal-directed communities for innovation. Calif Manage Rev 39(3):72–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW (2002) Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J Appl Psychol 87:765–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser RB, Hogan RT, Craig SB (2008) Leadership and the fate of organizations. Am Psychol 63:96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RE, Kaiser RB (2003) Developing versatile leadership. Sloan Manage Rev 44(4):18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM (2002) Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quart 13:705–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan VK (2001) Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton DK (1984) Genius, creativity, and leadership: historiometric inquiries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky L, Lovelace K, Gray DO, Walters SG, Geisler E (1998) Center leadership: putting it all together. In: Gray D, Walters S (eds) Managing the industry/university cooperative research center: a guide for directors and other stakeholders. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Borrill CS, Dawson JF, Brodbeck F (2003) Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care. Leadership Quart 14:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bartholomew Craig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: 360° Assessment of URC Leader Performance

Appendix: 360° Assessment of URC Leader Performance

$$\text{Rate}\,\text{items}\,\text{on}\,\text{scale}\,\text{from}\,-3\text\,{to}+3,$$

where −3  =  Too Little of This, 0  =  Perfect, and +3  =  Too Much of This.

Technical expertise

  1. 1.

    Demonstrates personal knowledge of technical areas related to the Center’s work

  2. 2.

    Uses his or her personal technical expertise in Center projects

  3. 3.

    Monitors new developments in technical areas related to the Center’s work

  4. 4.

    Engages in professional development or continuing education activities to increase his or her personal technical expertise in areas related to the Center’s work

Broad thinking

  1. 5.

    Creates a compelling vision for guiding future work in the Center

  2. 6.

    Invests time and energy in long-term planning

  3. 7.

    Focuses on the long-term goals of the Center

  4. 8.

    Attends conferences, colloquia, and other meetings that are relevant to the Center’s work

Personal energy and ambition

  1. 9.

    Sets high goals—attempts to get a lot accomplished

  2. 10.

    Maintains a high personal energy level

  3. 11.

    Juggles multiple tasks simultaneously (multitasks)

  4. 12.

    Performs a wide variety of functions

Delivering results

  1. 13.

    Builds a productive research enterprise in the Center

  2. 14.

    Knows whom to contact in the university to get things done

  3. 15.

    Knows whom to contact in sponsoring or partner organizations to get things done

  4. 16.

    Meets procedural deadlines

Attention to detail

  1. 17.

    Attends to the details

  2. 18.

    Spends time performing the tasks of an administrator

  3. 19.

    Organized

  4. 20.

    Follows through—delivers

Dealing with ambiguity

  1. 21.

    Initiates structure in vague or ambiguous situations

  2. 22.

    Lets others know what he or she is thinking

  3. 23.

    Adapts to changing requirements of the Center Director role

  4. 24.

    Creates systems and procedures for getting the work done

Fostering creativity and innovation

  1. 25.

    Encourages “out-of-the-box” thinking—in self and others

  2. 26.

    Encourages brainstorming sessions

  3. 27.

    Builds new work upon what has come before

  4. 28.

    Willing to take risks with new ideas

Spanning boundaries

  1. 29.

    Leverages professional relationships to benefit the Center’s work

  2. 30.

    Incorporates input from stakeholders external to the Center

  3. 31.

    Interacts with external Center constituents

  4. 32.

    Pays attention to events in the external environment that might impact the Center’s work

Interpersonal skill

  1. 33.

    Sensitive to others’ feelings

  2. 34.

    Puts others at ease

  3. 35.

    Patient when dealing with other people

  4. 36.

    Allows others to speak

Ethics and fairness

  1. 37.

    Operates in accordance with Center rules and funding requirements

  2. 38.

    Distributes funding and other resources for Center projects in a fair manner

  3. 39.

    Gives credit to others for their ideas

  4. 40.

    Is honest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Craig, S.B., Hess, C.E., McGinnis, J.L., Gray, D.O. (2013). Assessing Leadership Performance in University-Based Cooperative Research Centers: Evidence from Four Studies. In: Boardman, C., Gray, D., Rivers, D. (eds) Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4388-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics