Skip to main content

Careers and Organisational Objectives: Managing Competing Interests in Cooperative Research Centres

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter contribution to the edited volume addresses the growing interest among science policy researchers and practitioners in understanding the organisational dilemmas confronted in cooperative research centres (CRCs). The authors Sam Garrett-Jones, Tim Turpin and Kieren Diment acknowledge that little empirical evidence exists on (a) how individual researchers perceive the benefits of their participation, (b) how far the structures and functions of particular centres coalesce around of researchers’ expectations and (c) what problems arise for researchers who opt for a ‘second job’ in the centre. The authors use the broad policy and organisational context of the Australian CRC to conduct a qualitative analysis of a survey of respondents from government organisations and universities involved in these centres. They use the perspective of the individual research scientists from academia and government participating in centres to illuminate the management issues of trust, governance and competition between functional domains, which emerge from the field of inter-organisational relationships, which the authors suggest have been inadequately recognised in the context of CRC including but not limited to the Australian model. For complementary examinations, see the chapter by Branco Ponomariov and Craig Boardman on benefits across stakeholder types (including but not limited to academic faculty) from participation in CRC as well as the chapter by Beth M. Coberly and Denis O. Gray on the tangible and intangible benefits gained (or not) by academic faculty participating in centres.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Role strain results from ‘a lack of congruence between the needs and interests of the individual and the demands of the organization’ (Box and Cotgrove 1966:24).

References

  • Boardman C, Bozeman B (2007) Role strain in university research centers. J High Educ 78:430–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box S, Cotgrove S (1966) Scientific identity, occupational selection, and role strain. Br J Sociol 17:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalişkan K, Callon M (2010) Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Econ Soc 39(1):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2001) The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chompalov I, Genuth J, Shrum W (2002) The organization of scientific collaborations. Res Policy 31:749–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2005) Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc Stud Sci 35:703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2007) Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Res Policy 36:1620–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIISR (Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) (2010a) Program guidelines: cooperative research centres program. DIISR, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • DIISR (Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) (2010b) CRC directory 2010–11. DIISR, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Diment K, Garrett-Jones S (2007) How demographic characteristics affect mode preference in a postal/web mixed-mode survey of Australian researchers. Soc Sci Comput Rev 25:410–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga A (2004) The new production of reductionism in models relating to research policy. In: Grandin K, Wormbs N, Widmalm S (eds) The science-industry nexus: history, policy, implications: Nobel symposium 123. Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, pp 277–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1997) Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulop L, Couchman P (2006) Facing up to the risks in commercially focused university–industry R&D partnerships. High Educ Res Dev 25:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Jones S, Turpin T (2002) Measuring the outcomes of the CRC program: a framework—final report. Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Jones S, Turpin T (2007) The triple helix and institutional change: reward, risk and response in Australian Cooperative Research Centres. In: Triple helix VI: sixth international conference on university, industry and government linkages—emerging models for the entrepreneurial university: regional diversities or global convergence. Research Publishing Services, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Jones S, Turpin T, Burns P, Diment K (2005a) Common purpose and divided loyalties: the risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers. R&D Manage 35(5):535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Jones S, Turpin T, Diment K (2005b) Different cultures, different perspectives: the experiences of academic and government researchers in collaborative R&D centres. In: Paper presented at The R&D management conference 2005: organising R&D activities—a balancing act. Manchester, RADMA, Pisa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Jones S, Turpin T, Diment K (2010) Managing competition between individual and ­organizational goals in cross-sector research and development centres. J Technol Transf 35(5):527–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray D (2011) Cross sector research collaboration in the USA: a national innovation system perspective. Sci Public Policy 38(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen M (2000) Between Scylla and Charybdis—and enjoying it  Organizational tension and research work. Sci Stud 13:53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy CB (1993) Understanding organizations. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus Rev May–June:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey J, Pettigrew A, Ferlie E (2002) The determinants of research group performance: towards Mode 2  J Manage Stud 39:747–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch MJ (1997) Organization theory: modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel M (2004) Current science policies and their implications for the formation and maintenance of academic identity. High Educ Policy 17:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ (2005) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland CP, Lockett AG (1998) Business trust and the formation of virtual organizations. In: 31st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 602–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells J, Edler J (2011) Structural innovations: towards a unified perspective. Sci Public Policy 38(2):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M (2000) ‘Mode 2’ in context: the contract researcher, the university and the knowledge society. In: Jacob M, Hellstrom T (eds) The future of knowledge production in the academy. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ Sci 10:791–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb R, Davidson E (2004) Hybrid organization in high-tech enterprise. In: E-global: 17th Bled e-commerce conference. Bled, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H (2001) The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electron J Sociol. http://www.sociology.org/archive.html. Accessed 11 June 2008

  • Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL (1998) From handshake to contract: intellectual property, trust, and the social structure of academic research. In: Lane C, Bachmann R (eds) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 118–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard C (2004) The economics of hybrid organizations. J Inst Theor Econ 160:345–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton RK, Barber E (1976) Sociological ambivalence [originally published 1963]. In: Merton RK (ed) Sociological ambivalence and other essays. The Free Press, New York, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff DC (2002) The emergence of hybrid organizational forms: combining identity-based service provision and political action. Nonprof Volunt Sec Q 31:377–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (2000) Institutions and forms of co-ordination in innovation systems. Organ Stud 21:915–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-Thinking Science: knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster SM (1994) Modern competitive analysis (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, New York

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane M (2008) Collaborating to a purpose: review of the Cooperative Research Centres Program (Chair: Mary O’Kane). Commonwealth of Australia, Collaboration Working Group of the National Innovation System Review Panel, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) Public-private partnerships for research and innovation: an evaluation of the Australian experience. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock T (2011) Disappointment but no surprises in funding round results to date. Cooperative Research News, Sept 2011. CRC Association, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelz DC, Andrews FM (1976) Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development, revised edn. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2007) Public support for science and innovation. Research report, Commonwealth of Australia, March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip A (2000) Fashions, lock-ins and the heterogeneity of knowledge production. In: Jacob M, Hellstrom T (eds) The future of knowledge production in the academy. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller D (2011) Institutions and practices in cross-sector research collaboration: conceptual considerations with empirical illustrations from the German science sector. Sci Public Policy 38(2):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove E (2000) Reciprocities and reputations: new currencies in research. In: Jacob M, Hellstrom T (eds) The future of knowledge production in the academy. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuis H-J, Gray DO (2006) Cooperative research and technology dynamics: the role of research strategy development in NSF Science and Technology Centres. Int J Technol Transf Commer 5:56–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Thune T, Gulbrandsen M (2011) Institutionalization of university-industry interaction: an empirical study of the impact of formal structures on collaboration patterns in Science and Public Policy 38(2):99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin T, Garrett-Jones S (2000) Mapping the new cultures and organization of research in Australia. In: Weingart P, Stehr N (eds) Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto University Press, Toronto, pp 79–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin T, Garrett-Jones S, Rankin N (1996) Bricoleurs and boundary riders: managing basic research and innovation knowledge networks. R&D Manage 26(3):267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpin T, Garrett-Jones S, Diment K (2005) Scientists, career choices and organizational change: managing human resources in cross-sector R&D organizations. J Aust NZ Acad Manage 11:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin T, Garrett-Jones S, Woolley R (2011) Cross sector research collaboration in Australia: the cooperative research centres program at the cross roads’. Sci Public Policy 38(2):87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J (1991) Academic science as a system of markets. High Educ Quart 45:41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported in part by an ARC Discovery Grant No. DP0211298, “Managing the risks of cross-sector R&D collaboration”. We thank: Jörg Sydow for his helpful critique of an earlier version of this paper, which we presented at the European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) 22nd Colloquium, Bergen, Norway, in July 2006; Magnus Gulbrandsen for productive discussion; four anonymous reviews for their comments; Denis O. Gray for helpful suggestions and Sarah Endacott for editorial advice. This chapter is an expanded version of Garrett-Jones et al. (2010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Garrett-Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., Diment, K. (2013). Careers and Organisational Objectives: Managing Competing Interests in Cooperative Research Centres. In: Boardman, C., Gray, D., Rivers, D. (eds) Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4388-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics