Skip to main content

God and Belief

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 762 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL))

Abstract

In the definitions that have been applied to God by various theologians, scientists, and an assortment of other interested parties, such definitions range from the commonsense to the intellectually driven phenomenological ones, all the way to the highly esoteric. In most cases, the absolutists are those who offer the most commonplace definitions acknowledging God’s existence—take it or leave it. On the other hand, intellectually minded philosophers and theologians who are life-long believers or who have spent significant time thinking about God, offer definitions that seem to have been formulated in especially original ways. Such thinking emerges as intelligently egalitarian, ever interesting in their Godly definitions, and hypothetically could not immediately be dismissed as wrong. As such, original thinking by Freud might be considered by like-minded nonbelievers to be absolutely correct and proof positive that a true God does not exist. So too, original and sophisticated thinking by theists might be considered by like-minded people also to be absolutely correct and proof positive that a true God does indeed exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, K. (2009). The case for God. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. J. (2007). Playing with God: Religion and modern sport. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M., Perilloux, C., et al. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (2009). Saving God: Religion after idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1996). Three pleasing ideas. American Psychologist, 51, 901–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, H. (1987). God matters. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. (2009, April 13). The end of Christian America. Newsweek Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarna, N. (1986). Exploring Exodus: The heritage of biblical Israel. New York, NY: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2006, April 17). Blood relations. Sports Illustrated, 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1963). Christianity and the encounter of the world religions. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, K. (1992, January 6). Why America prays. Newsweek Magazine, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2009a). The evolution of God. New York, NY: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kellerman, H. (2013). God and Belief. In: The Discovery of God. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4364-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics