Skip to main content

Sexuality in Families: The (Re-) Creation of Sexual Culture

  • Chapter
Handbook of Marriage and the Family

Abstract

Family is the context in which meanings of sexuality are initially learned: our understandings of sexuality, as well as our attitudes and values about sexuality, are influenced by our familial experiences in childhood and across the life course. Likewise, our understandings of “family” are grounded in our ideas and beliefs about sexuality. Thus, sexuality is basic to family life; it is a multifaceted concept with intra-psychic, interpersonal, and socio-cultural meanings rooted in family. In this chapter, we review social science literature on sexuality in family life, considering the ways that sexual culture gets created and re-created in families across generations. A family life course perspective provides a guide for understanding the sexual socialization of children, adolescents, and adults in multiple family contexts. We give explicit attention to gender, culture, class, and race in our synthesis of prior work, and consider social learning theory, symbolic interaction, and queer theory as important contributors in recent decades to understanding sexuality in families. Our goal is to describe a “positive” vision of sexuality for families—a “sex education” that embraces sexuality as a natural, healthy dimension of personal development and family relationships across the life span.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bisexuality refers to an identity of someone who is attracted (sexually, emotionally, and/or romantically) to both men and women (Rust, 2001).

  2. 2.

    Asexuality refers to an identity and/or the experience of someone who does not experience sexual attraction or desire (Scherrer, 2008).

  3. 3.

    Polyamory refers to a relationship orientation that assumes “it is possible to maintain multiple love relationships and desirable to be open and honest within these” (Barker, 2005, p. 76).

  4. 4.

    A notable exception is research on childhood sexual abuse (e.g., see Fisher, 2004).

  5. 5.

    Heterosexism is defined as “an ideological system that denies, denigrates, and stigmatizes any non-heterosexual form of behavior, identity, relationship, or community” (Herek, 1992, p. 89); homophobia has been defined as the negative emotions targeted at lesbian and gay individuals, their children, or their families and stems from heterosexism (Sears, 1992).

  6. 6.

    A consequence of this inattention to childhood sexuality is a juggernaut for research: there are few empirical examples to follow, few well-documented methodologies for appropriate approaches, and persistent aversion from scientific authorities (funders; human subjects review boards) that undermine support for further research (O’Sullivan, 2003).

  7. 7.

    Until large, population-based studies that intentionally include children of both heterosexual and same-sex parents are available, it will be impossible to draw definitive conclusions about whether lesbian/gay parents are more likely than heterosexual parents to have lesbian/gay children.

  8. 8.

    Despite the fact that six states and the District of Columbia now allow same-sex couples to enter into legally-recognized civil marriages, the 1996 Federal Defense of Marriage Act defined marriage as between one man and one woman for federal purposes; thus, even same-sex couples who get married in one of these six states or DC are not privy to the majority of the over 1,100 federal rights, benefits, and protections that accompany marriage for heterosexual couples.

  9. 9.

    Attitudes toward homosexuality seem to have changed significantly in recent years; according to a 2007 Pew poll (http://pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/258.pdf), 49 % of Americans said that homosexuality should be accepted, while 41 % said that it should be rejected.

References

  • Allen, K. R. (2009). Keeping the feminist in our teaching: Daring to make a difference. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 351–359). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., Bobrow, D., Wolfe, M., & Mikach, S. (1995). Sexual orientation of adult sons of gay fathers. Developmental Psychology, 31, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J. (2003). Sexual development in childhood. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my…partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 469–499). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D. (2009). Theorizing lesbian and gay parenting: Past, present, and future scholarship. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschneider, J., & McCoy, N. (1988). Sexual interest and behavior in the health of 80–102 year-olds. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. O. (2004). Sexuality in midlife and later life couples. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 437–454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E., Sears, H., & Weaver, A. (2008). Parents’ reports of sexual communication with children in kindergarten to grade 8. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 70, 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S. E. (1983). Reexamining the acquisition of sex roles: A social interactionist approach. Sex Roles, 9, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2004). The desire to date and remarry among older widows and widowers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1051–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S. (2001). To dance the dance: A symbolic interactional explanation of premarital sexuality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., & Kisler, T. S. (2004). Exploring marital sexuality: Peeking inside the bedroom and discovering what we don’t know—But should! In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 371–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., Madura, M., & Weaver, L. (1998). Premarital sexual aggressors: A multivariate analysis of social, relational, and individual variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2005). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1987a). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality: Theories and research (pp. 127–139). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1987b). A sociological perspective. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 237–256). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J., & Friedrich, W. N. (2002). Human sexual development. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J., & Hyde, J. S. (2004). Conceptual and theoretical issues in studying sexuality in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 7–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M., Savin-Williams, R. C., & Dube, E. M. (1999). Sex, dating, passionate friendships, and romance. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 175–210). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreby, J. (2006). Honor and virtue: Mexican parenting in the transnational context. Gender and Society, 20, 32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, S., & O’Sullivan, L. (2007). “It’s less work for us and it shows us she has good taste”: Masculinity, sexual initiation, and contemporary sexual scripts. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 105–121). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Jr., & Shanahan, M. J. (2006). The life course and human development. In R. E. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development (The handbook of child psychology 6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 665–715). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1996). A queer encounter: Sociology and the study of sexuality. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 145–168). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. A., Demo, D. H., & Allen, K. A. (2000). Family diversity in the 21st century: Implications for research, policy, and practice. In D. H. Demo, K. A. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 440–448). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. D. (2004). Family foundations of sexuality. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 385–409). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., & Corcoran, J. (2000). Parenting adolescent pregnancy: A review of programs and practices. Social Work, 24(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabb, J. (2004). Sexuality education: How children of lesbian mothers “learn” about sex/uality. Sex Education, 4(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V., & Libby, R. (1976). Sexual behavior as symbolic interaction. Journal of Sex Research, 12, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2007). (How) does it make a difference? Perspectives of adults with lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Lesbian and gay parents and their children: Research on the family life cycle. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. K. (2008). Media contributions to African American girls’ focus on beauty and appearance: Exploring the consequences of sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. S. (1990). Children of gay and lesbian parents. In F. W. Bozett & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), Homosexuality and family relations (pp. 177–196). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., Mandel, J. B., Hotvedt, M. E., Gray, J., & Smith, L. (1986). Lesbian mothers and their children: A comparison with solo parent heterosexual mothers and their children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. C. (2010). Sex, stigma, and the Holy Ghost: The Black Church and the construction of AIDS in New York City. Journal of African American Studies, 14, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, J. M. (2005). Family communication about sex: Parents and college-aged offspring recall discussion topics, satisfaction, and parent involvement. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Sex and romantic love: Connects and disconnects. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 159–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, G., & Koff, B. (2001). Something to tell you: The road families travel when a child is gay. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1992). The social context of hate crimes: Notes on cultural heterosexism. In G. M. Herek & K. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 89–104). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, M., & Byrne, D. (1998). Using social learning theory to explain individual differences in sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Dittus, P., & Gordon, V. (2000). Parent-teen communication about premarital sex: Factors associated with the extent of communication. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(2), 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (1987). A biosocial theory of heterosexual relationships. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality (pp. 59–100). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. L. (2009). Asian American women’s retrospective reports of their sexual socialization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(3), 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (2007). John Gagnon and the sexual self. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. vii–xv). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsberg, S. A. (2002). The impact of aging on sexual functioning in women and their partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2001). Sexualities. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 272–285). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuvalanka, K., & Goldberg, A. (2009). “Second generation” voices: Queer youth with lesbian/bisexual mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 904–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 278–290). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. G., Russell, S. T., & Leong, S. J. (2008). Maternal correlates of noncoital sexual behavior: Examining a nationally representative sample of Asian and White American adolescents who have not had sex. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (1998). Egalitarian daters/traditionalist dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 468–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (2005). The social organization of sexuality. In J. K. Davidson & N. B. Moore (Eds.), Speaking of sexuality: Interdisciplinary readings (pp. 29–39). Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, E., & Espinosa-Hernandez, G. (2007). Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, E., Romo, L., Corona, R., Au, T., & Sigman, M. (2000). How Latino American and European American adolescents discuss conflicts, sexuality, and AIDS with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, E. S., & Stoppa, T. M. (2006). Positive sexual communication and socialization in the parent-adolescent context. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 112, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longmore, M. A. (1998). Symbolic interactionism and the study of sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahay, J., Laumann, E. O., & Michaels, S. (2001). Race, gender, and class in sexual scripts. In E. O. Laumann & R. T. Michael (Eds.), Sex, love, and health in America (pp. 197–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, W., & Donnelly, D. (1991). Sexual relations in later life: A national study of married persons. Journal of Gerontology, 46, S338–S344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. A. (2009). Normalizing heterosexuality: Mothers’ assumptions, talk, and strategies with young children. American Sociological Review, 74, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthias, R. E., Lubben, J. E., Atchison, K. A., & Schweitzer, S. O. (1997). Sexual activity and satisfaction among very old adults: Results from a community-dwelling Medicare population survey. The Gerontologist, 37, 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Los Angeles: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1966). A social-learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V. (1998). The birds, the bees…and the sperm banks: How lesbian mothers talk with their children about sex and reproduction. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(3), 400–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. J., & Stratton, D. C. (2001). Resilient widowers: Older men speak for themselves. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D. F. (2004). Social work practice with gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender adolescents. Families in Society, 85, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nangle, D. W., & Hansen, D. J. (1998). Adolescent heterosocial competence revisited: Implications of an extended conceptualization for the prevention of high-risk sexual interactions. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, M., & Treister, L. (1998). Victims of dating violence among high school students: Are the predictors different for males and females? Violence Against Women, 4(2), 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M., & Hyde, J. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S., & Ehrhardt, A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F. (2003). Methodological issues associated with studies of child sexual behavior. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Sexual development in childhood (pp. 23–33). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, R. F., Blume, L. B., & Marks, S. R. (2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory & research (pp. 143–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, R. F., Kuvalanka, K. A., Blume, L., & Berkowitz, D. (2009). Queering “the family”. In S. Lloyd, A. Few, & K. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 43–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. P., Catania, J., Pollack, L., & Stall, R. (2001). Understanding childhood sexual abuse as a predictor of sexual risk-taking among men who have sex with men: The Urban Men’s Health Study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 557–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., Fingerhut, A., & Beals, K. P. (2004). Sexuality in the relationships of lesbians and gay men. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 349–369). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex difference: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1699–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (2007). Queers, bodies, and postmodern sexualities: A note on revisiting the “sexual” in symbolic interactionism. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 16–30). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlishta, K. K., Sen, M. G., Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). From infancy through middle childhood: The role of cognitive and social factors in becoming gendered. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 116–132). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabun, C., & Oswald, R. F. (2009). Upholding and expanding the normal family: Future fatherhood through the eyes of gay male emerging adults. Fathering, 7(3), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli, M., Bogenschneider, K., & Flood, M. (1998). Parent-teen communications about sexual topics. Journal of Family Issues, 19(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli, M., & Green, S. (2003). Parent-adolescent communication about sex: Retrospective reports by Latino college students. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 65(2), 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli, M., & Ontai, L. (2001). “She’s 16 years old and there’s boys calling over to the house”: An exploratory study of sexual socialization in Latino families. Health and Sexuality, 3(3), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T., & Bing, V. M. (2000). Sexual roles of girls and women: An ethnocultural lifespan perspective. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 141–166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhimes, S. (Writer), Bans, J. (Writer), & Verica, T. (Director). (2009). Tainted obligation [Television series episode]. In S. Rhimes (Executive producer), Grey’s anatomy. Los Angeles: ABC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1982). The development and applications of social learning theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. T. (2005). Conceptualizing positive adolescent sexuality development. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(3), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, P. C. (2001). Two many and not enough: The meanings of bisexual identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 32–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C., Huebner, D., Diaz, R. M., & Sanches, J. (2009). Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in White and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics, 123(1), 346–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandfort, T. G. M., & Rademakers, J. (2000). Childhood sexuality: Normal sexual behavior and development. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelli, J., Ott, M. A., Lyon, M., Rogers, J., Summers, D., & Schleifer, R. (2006). Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of U.S. policies and programs. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C. (1996). Self-labeling and disclosure among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. In J. Laird & R. J. Green (Eds.), Lesbians and gays in couples and families (pp. 153–182). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2004). Sex. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 189–231). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Are men really more ‘oriented’ toward short-term mating than women? A critical review of theory and research. Psychology, Evolution, & Gender, 3, 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, D., & Ehrhardt, A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, J. T. (1992). Educators, homosexuality, and homosexual students: Are personal feelings related to professional beliefs? In K. M. Harbeck (Ed.), Coming out of the classroom closet: Gay and lesbian students, teachers, and curricula (pp. 29–79). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtarkshall, R. A., Santelli, J. S., & Hirsch, J. S. (2007). Sex education and sexual socialization: Roles for educators and parents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 116–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiler, A. P., Ward, L. M., Caruthers, A., & Merriwether, A. (2005). Pleasure, empowerment, and love: Factors associated with a positive first coitus. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(3), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Barbee, A., & Schwartz, P. (1995). “Was it good for you, too?”: Gender differences in first sexual intercourse experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Harris, G., & Meyers, A. (2008). Perceptions of sources of sex education and targets of sex communication: Sociodemographic and cohort effects. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M., & Karraker, K. H. (1989). Sex stereotyping of infants: A review of gender labeling studies. Sex Roles, 20, 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Straight allies: Supportive attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in a college sample. Sex Roles, 60, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutfin, E. L., Fulcher, M., Bowles, R. P., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). How lesbian and heterosexual parents convey attitudes about gender to their children: The role of gendered environments. Sex Roles, 58, 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M. J., Brown, J., Wilson, K. M., & Klein, J. D. (2002). Shaking the tree of knowledge for forbidden fruit: Where adolescents learn about sexuality and contraception. In J. Brown, J. R. Steele, & K. Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, F. L., & Golombok, S. (1997). Growing up in a lesbian family: Effects on child development. London: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. M., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan, A. M. (1995). Between voice and silence: Women and girls, race and relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L. (1996). Adolescent girls’ sexuality: Debunking the myth of the urban girl. In B. J. R. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 255–271). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L., & Diamond, L. M. (2001). Desegregating sexuality research: Cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 33–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche, M. V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, T. G. (2008). Protecting our daughters: Intersection of race, class, and gender in African American mothers’ socialization of their daughters’ heterosexuality. Sex Roles, 59, 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troost, K. M., & Filsinger, E. (1993). Emerging biosocial perspectives on the family. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 677–710). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2004). Defense of Marriage Act: Update to prior report (GAO-04-353R). Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.gao.gov

  • Wainright, J. L., Russell, S. T., & Patterson, C. J. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment, school outcomes, and romantic relationships of adolescents with same-sex parents. Child Development, 75, 1886–1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, D. L. (1998). The state of sexual theory. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, M. C., Sprecher, S., & Beck, F. D. (2004). Overview of sexual practices and attitudes within relational contexts. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 57–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (2005). Peer victimization, social support, and psychological adjustment of sexual minority adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J. (2009a). Father-child sexual communication in the United States: A review and synthesis. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J. (2009b). Sexual socialization messages in mainstream entertainment mass media: A review and synthesis. Sexuality & Culture, 13, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Katherine R. Allen who generously provided helpful feedback on an early outline of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine A. Kuvalanka PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuvalanka, K.A., Weiner, J.L., Russell, S.T. (2013). Sexuality in Families: The (Re-) Creation of Sexual Culture. In: Peterson, G., Bush, K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics