Skip to main content

Robot-Assisted Vasectomy Reversal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1989 Accesses

Abstract

In the early part of the twentieth century, the vasectomy gained momentum with the application for eugenic, punitive, and therapeutic purposes. Today, with the exception of its use as prophylaxis procedure after transurethral resection of prostate or adenomectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to prevent urogenital infections, vasectomy is widely used as a contraceptive tool, and it is calculated that about 50 million men have relied on vasectomy for family planning. Above all, in the United States, vasectomy is employed as contraceptive method by nearly 11% of married couples. With the upcoming success of vasectomy, a new surgical procedure, the vasectomy reversal was born.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sandlow JI, Nagler HM. Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: important issues. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36(3):xiii–xiv.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jequier AM. Edward Martin (1859–1938). The founding father of modern clinical andrology. Int J Androl. 1991;14(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Belker AM, Thomas Jr AJ, Fuchs EF, et al. Results of 1469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol. 1991;145:505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yarbro ES, Howards SS. Vasovasostomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1987;14(3):515–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meacham RB, Niederberger CS. Use of a moderated international Internet information exchange in the study of male reproduction. Urology. 1996;48(1):3–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas Jr AJ, Pontes JE, Buddhdev H, Pierce Jr JM. Vasovasostomy: evaluation of four surgical techniques. Fertil Steril. 1979;32(3):324–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuse H, Kimura H, Katayama T. Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patiens. Int Urol Nephrol. 1995;27(4):451–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer MA, Grantmyre JE. Comparison of modified one- and two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy. BJU Int. 2000;85(9):1085–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein M, Li PS, Matthews GJ. Microsurgical vasovasostomy: the microdot technique of precision suture placement. J Urol. 1998;159(1):188–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothman I, Berger RE, Cummings P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of an absorbable stent for vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1997;157(5):1697–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hendry WF. Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal. Br J Urol. 1994;73(4):337–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleming C. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31:769–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, et al. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol. 2004;171(1):300–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuang W, Shin PR, Oder M, et al. Robotic assisted vasovasostomy: a two-layer technique in an animal model. J Urol. 2005;65(4):811–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol. 2004;171:1720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parekattil SJ, Atalah HN, Cohen MS. Video technique for human robot-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(4):511–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Boccard G-A. Robotic vasectomy reversal, video, posted YouTube. 25 Oct 2009. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zHRyFHC7nE.

  18. De Boccard G-A, Mottrie A. Robotic surgery in male infertility, in Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery, vol. 7. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 617–23.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Boorjian S, Lipkin M, Goldstein M. The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 2004;171:304–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone Jr DJ, Shah A, Thomas Jr AJ, et al. Partial obstruction, not antisperm antibodies, causing infertility after vasovasostomy. J Urol. 1998;159:827–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National summary and Fertility clinic reports. www.cdc.gov/ART. Accessed 1 June 2011.

  • Chan PT, Goldstein M. Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1371–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz S, Rais-Bahrami S, Kempkensteffen C, et al. Fertility rates following vasectomy reversal: importance of age of the female partner. Urol Int. 2008;81:416–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HH, Goldstein M. History of vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36:359–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolettis PN. Is physical examination useful in predicting epididymal obstruction? Urology. 2001;57:1138–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meinertz H, Linnet L, Fogh-Andersen P, et al. Antisperm antibodies and fertility after vasovasostomy: a follow-up study of 216 men. Fertil Steril. 1990;64:315–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekattil SJ, Kuang W, Kolettis PN, et al. Multi-institutional validation of vasectomy reversal predictor. J Urol. 2006;175:247–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts JM, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson D, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1999;161:1835–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Frank De Wil MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Wil, P.F., Ficarra, V., de Boccard, G.A., Mottrie, A. (2012). Robot-Assisted Vasectomy Reversal. In: Parekattil, S., Agarwal, A. (eds) Male Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3335-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3334-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3335-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics