Abstract
This chapter discusses the effectiveness of digital knowledge mapping as an instructional strategy in an online graduate-level course at a North American university. Digital concept mapping tools would help students in constructivist online learning settings to collect ideas and generate and organize knowledge. The creation of digital knowledge maps enhances the cognitive processes, management, structuring, and restructuring of knowledge. Concept maps have proven to be a valuable cognitive tool in a variety of learning and instructional settings. An online course was designed using a knowledge-building Community of Practice (CoP) learning environment. A community is defined as a group of individuals who share experiences, learn together, and engage in regular interaction though discussion and knowledge sharing activities relevant to their domain. An online CoP may foster a high level of student interaction through group discussions and collaborative activities (Draper, The instructional effects of knowledge based communities of practice learning environments on student achievement and knowledge convergence. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 2010). In a moderated online instructional setting, graduate students collaborated and shared information to construct digital knowledge maps of instructional technology theories and concepts, which represent a shared meaning of complex theoretical concepts and content. This newly shared meaning represented knowledge convergence. This chapter begins by describing knowledge management, digital knowledge maps, communities of practice, and facilitator best practices, and then provides a document review and content analysis approach to evaluate the artifacts to determine common themes. Finally, suggestions and future research are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: Social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.
Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., & Lott, J. (2003). Support for constructing knowledge models in Cmap Tools. (Technical report No. IHMC Cmap Tools 2003-02). Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human Machine Cognition.
De Lisi, R., & Goldbeck, S. L. (1999). Implication of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405–441.
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–96.
Jeong, H., & Chi, M. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 34, 287–315.
Johnson, T., Silkorski, E., Mendenhall, A., Khalil, M., & Lee, Y. (2010). Selection of team interventions based on mental models sharedness levels measured by the Team Assessment and Diagnostic Instrument (TADI). In D. Ifenthaler et al. (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-14419-5662-0_17.
Kimble, C., & Hildreth, P. (2005). Dualities, distributed communities of practice and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 102–113.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindblom, J., & Ziemke, T. (2003). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behavior, 11(2), 79–96.
Monereo, C. (2009). Knowledge convergence. State of the Art. Internal report. Retrieved from http://cat-cscl.eu
Norberg, A., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Novak, J. D., & Musconda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Reasearch Journal, 28(1), 117–153.
Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (2002). Mapping knowledge. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Robey, J., Khoo, H. M., & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. IEEE transaction on professional communication, 3(3), 384–392.
Romero, M., & Lambropoulos, N. (2011). Internal and external regulation to support knowledge construction and convergence in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 309–330.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Schwen, T., & Hara, N. (2003). Community of practice: A metaphor for online design? The Information Society, 19(3), 257–270.
Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Vygotsky, L. (1928). The problem of the cultural development of the child II. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415–432.
Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thought and language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1979). The genesis of higher mental function. In T. V. Wertsch (Trans.) (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. New York, NY: M E Sharpe, Inc.
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative l
Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9, 5.
Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wilson, B., Ludwig-Hardman, S., Thornam, C. L., & Dunlap, J. C. (2004). Bounded Community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5, 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Draper, D.C., Amason, R.F. (2014). Digital Knowledge Mapping as an Instructional Strategy to Enhance Knowledge Convergence: A Case Study. In: Ifenthaler, D., Hanewald, R. (eds) Digital Knowledge Maps in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3177-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3178-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)