Abstract
The focus of the clinical neuropsychologist in everyday practice is on neurocognitive change. Because the diagnosis of dementia as well as mild cognitive impairment requires evidence of cognitive decline over time, the assessment of meaningful neurocognitive change is especially relevant in the evaluation of older adults. We briefly discuss the clinical use of norm-referenced tests used in traditional single-point assessments and then focus on the use of serial assessments to objectively monitor and assess cognitive changes over time, discussing the unique advantages and challenges of serial assessments. An overview and distillation of reliable change methods are presented and applied to a case example, demonstrating how these methods can be used as effective tools to inform the clinical evaluation of the individual patient. In the end, we hope to leave the reader with an appreciation that change is a unique variable with its own inherent statistical properties and clinical meaning.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barth JT, Pliskin N, Axelrod B, et al. Introduction to the NAN 2001 definition of a clinical neuropsychologist. NAN Policy and Planning Committee. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18:551–5.
Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment—beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004;256:240–6.
Salthouse TA. Does the meaning of neurocognitive change change with age? Neuropsychology. 2010;24:273–8.
Howieson D, Holm LA, Kaye JA, Oken BS, Howieson J. Neurologic function in the optimally healthy oldest old: neuropsychological evaluation. Neurology. 1993;43:1882–6.
Cullum CM, Butters N, Troster AI, Salmon DP. Normal aging and forgetting rates on the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1990;5:23–30.
Busch RM, Chelune GJ, Suchy Y. Using norms in the neuropsychological assessment of the elderly. In: Attix DK, Welsh-Bohmer KA, editors. Geriatric neuropsychology: assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford; 2006. p. 133–57.
Howieson D, Carlson NE, Moore MM, et al. Trajectory of mild cognitive impairment onset. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14:192–8.
Duff K, Beglinger LJ, Moser DJ, Paulsen JS, Schultz SK, Arndt S. Predicting cognitive change in older adults: the relative contribution of practice effects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25:81–8.
Duff K. Predicting premorbid memory functioning in older adults. Appl Neuropsychol. 2010;17:278–82.
Pearson. Advanced clinical solutions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV clinical and interpretative manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2009.
Chelune GJ. Evidence-based research and practice in clinical neuropsychology. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:454–67.
Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Attix DK, Krull KR, Henry GK, Hart RP. Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on serial neuropsychological assessments: the utility and challenges of repeat test administrations in clinical and forensic contexts. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:1267–78.
Hinton-Bayre AD. Deriving reliable change statistics from test-retest normative data: comparison of models and mathematical expressions. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25:244–56.
Stein J, Luppa M, Brahler E, Konig HH, Riedel-Heller SG. The assessment of changes in cognitive functioning: reliable change indices for neuropsychological instruments in the elderly—a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;29:275–86.
Chelune GJ. Assessing reliable neuropsychological change. In: Franklin R, editor. Prediction in forensic and neuropsychology: new approaches to psychometrically sound assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2003.
Salthouse TA. Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change. Neuropsychology. 2010;24:563–72.
Duff K, Schoenberg MR, Patton D, et al. Regression-based formulas for predicting change in RBANS subtests with older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:281–90.
Lineweaver TT, Chelune GJ. Use of the WAIS-III and WMS-III in the context of serial assessments: interpreting reliable and meaningful change. In: Tulsky DS, Saklofske DH, Chelune GJ, et al., editors. Clinical interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III. New York: Academic; 2003. p. 303–37.
Temkin NR, Heaton RK, Grant I, Dikmen SS. Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: a comparison of four models. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999;5:357–69.
Slick DJ. Psychometrics in neuropsychological assessment. In: Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O, editors. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 1–43.
Benedict RHB, Zgaljardic DJ. Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20:339–52.
Beglinger LJ, Gaydos B, Tangphao-Daniels O, et al. Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:517–29.
Collie A, Darby DG, Falleti MG, Silbert BS, Maruff P. Determining the extent of cognitive change after coronary surgery: a review of statistical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:2005–11.
Crawford JR. Quantitative aspects of neuropsychological assessment. In: Goldstein LH, McNeil JE, editors. Clinical neuropsychology: a practical guide to assessment and management for clinicians. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.
Matarazzo JD, Herman DO. Base rate data for the WAIS-R: test-retest stability and VIQ-PIQ differences. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984;6:351–66.
Hinton-Bayre AD. Methodology is more important than statistics when determining reliable change. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11:788–9.
Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Luders H, Sedlak J, Awad IA. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology. 1993;7:41–52.
The Psychological Corporation. Updated WAIS-III WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
McSweeny AJ, Naugle RI, Chelune GJ, Luders H. “T-scores for change”: an illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology. Clin Neuropsychol. 1993;7:300–12.
Maassen GH. Principles of defining reliable change indices. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000;22:622–32.
Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:12–9.
Iverson GL. Interpreting change on the WAIS-III/WMS-III in clinical samples. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;16:183–91.
Knight RG, McMahon J, Skeaff CM, Green TJ. Reliable Change Index scores for persons over the age of 65 tested on alternate forms of the Rey AVLT. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22:513–8.
Tombaugh TN. Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:485–503.
Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Using regression equations built from summery data in the neuropsychological assessment of the individual case. Neuropsychology. 2007;21:611–20.
Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Denham AK, Chelune GJ. Using regression equations built from summary data in the psychological assessment of the individual case: Extension to multiple regression. Psychol Assessment. 2012; in press.
Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Lucas JA, et al. Testing normal older people three or four times at 1- to 2-year intervals: defining normal variance. Neuropsychology. 1999;13:121–7.
Attix DK, Story TJ, Chelune GJ, et al. The prediction of change: normative neuropsychological trajectories. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:21–38.
Chelune GJ, Ivnik R, Smith G. Application of reliable change methods for identifying abnormal rates of cognitive decline in dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2006;2(S1):374.
Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Statistical methods for single-case studies in neuropsychology: comparing the slope of a patient’s regression line with those of a control sample. Cortex. 2004;40:533–48.
Darby DG, Pietrzak RH, Fredrickson J, Woodward M, Moore L, Fredrickson A, Sach J, Maruff P. Intra-individual cognitive decline using a brief computerized cognitive screening test. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8(2):95–104.
Albert M, Blacker D, Moss MB, Tanzi R, McArdle JJ. Longitudinal change in cognitive performance among individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology. 2007;21:158–69.
Stern Y, Liu X, Albert M, et al. Application of a growth curve approach to modeling the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996;51:M179–84.
Small BJ, Backman L. Longitudinal trajectories of cognitive change in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: a growth mixture modeling analysis. Cortex. 2007;43:826–34.
Hayden KM, Reed BR, Manly JJ, et al. Cognitive decline in the elderly: an analysis of population heterogeneity. Age Aging. 2011;40(6):684–9.
Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:397–405.
Amieva H, Le Goff M, Millet X, et al. Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: successive emergence of the clinical symptoms. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:492–8.
Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Kokmen E, Tangelos EG. Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:65–9.
Brooks BL, Iverson GL, White T. Substantial risk of “Accidental MCI” in healthy older adults: base rates of low memory scores in neuropsychological assessment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:490–500.
de Rotrou J, Wenisch E, Chausson C, Dray F, Faucounau V, Rigaud AS. Accidental MCI in healthy subjects: a prospective longitudinal study. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12:879–85.
Pedraza O, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, et al. Reliable change on the Dementia Rating Scale. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:716–20.
Duff K, Beglinger LJ, Van Der Heiden S, et al. Short-term practice effects in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20:986–99.
Darby D, Maruff P, Collie A, McStephen M. Mild cognitive impairment can be detected by multiple assessments in a single day. Neurology. 2002;59:1042–6.
Duff K, Beglinger LJ, Schultz SK, et al. Practice effects in the prediction of long-term cognitive outcome in three patient samples: a novel prognostic index. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22:15–24.
Duff K, Lyketsos CG, Beglinger LJ, et al. Practice effects predict cognitive outcome in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;19(11):932–9.
Duff K, Beglinger LJ, Moser DJ, Schultz SK, Paulsen JS. Practice effects and outcome of cognitive training: preliminary evidence from a memory training course. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;18:91.
Zec RF, Markwell SJ, Burkett NR, Larsen DL. A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11:716–26.
Montse A, Pere V, Carme J, Francesc V, Eduardo T. Visuospatial deficits in Parkinson’s disease assessed by judgment of line orientation test: error analyses and practice effects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23:592–8.
Leach L, Kaplan E, Rewilak D, Richards B. Kaplan KBNA baycrest neurocognitive assessment: manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chelune, G.J., Duff, K. (2013). The Assessment of Change: Serial Assessments in Dementia Evaluations. In: Ravdin, L., Katzen, H. (eds) Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Aging and Dementia. Clinical Handbooks in Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3106-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3106-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3105-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3106-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)