Abstract
The advantages of using case material as well as group research data have been discussed by Golden et al. and Heilman (Greiffenstein’s review and discussion of Heilman’s book). Golden et al. propose a multiple baseline approach to evaluating cases and demonstrating validity of treatment. The validity is reflected in improvements in treated areas, whereas no improvements are expected in untreated areas across multiple assessments. Heilman gives details of cases that are instructive and indicative of the major elements of the disorders studied. Earlier in this book I proposed a model that allows for multiple levels of evaluation of treatment efficacy. The multiple baseline approach fits well with this model. It also helps us to see the many subtle differences that exist among patients within a general diagnostic group as well as highlighting the major elements of the disorder as suggested by Heilman.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Podd, M.H. (2012). A NeurXercise Casebook. In: Cognitive Remediation for Brain Injury and Neurological Illness. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1975-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1975-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1974-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1975-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)