Skip to main content

Additional Adaptations Against Predation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

As butterflies, monarchs (Danaus plexippus) (Fig. 7.1) do not fight predators or act passively if an attack by a predator is imminent; instead, the monarch uses warning coloration and chemical defenses against predation. As adults, monarchs are brightly colored in orange, black, and white; they, therefore, stand out in the environment to a predator, much like the pattern of a poisonous coral snake (Micrurus fulvius) (Zug et al. 2001). What does the coloration of a monarch signal to a potential predator? That is unpalatable, so stay away. Monarch becomes unpalatable because of toxins that larvae feed upon in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). These toxins are cardio glycosides, which elicits vomiting in birds that may feed upon them. Only two bird species, the black-headed oriole (Icterus abeillei) and the black-headed grosbeak (Pheucticus melanocephalus) are known to feed on monarch with no ill effect. In fact, the viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus) mimics the coloration of the monarch to offset predation on it, which is a form of mimicry known as Batesian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrette C (1977) Fighting behavior in muntjac and the evolution of antlers. Evolution 31:166–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram CRB (1978) Living in groups. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 64–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, O’Rianin MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or misinformation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 282–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards ED, Gentili P, Horak M, Kristensen NP, Nielsen ES (1999) The cossoid/sesioid assemblage. In: Kristensen NP (ed) Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies. Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp 183–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibel-Eibesfeldt I (1970) Ethology: the biology of behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 530 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill FR (1990) Onithology. W.H. Freeman and Co, New York, 660 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough McGuire, Wallace J, McGuire B, Wallace RA (2001) Perspectives on animal behavior, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 542 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Greenwood PJ (1978) Anti-predator defence strategies: some evolutionary problems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 129–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak JF, Macedonia JM, Fox SF, Sauceda RC (2006) Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay-covered model lizards. Ethology 112:572–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon J (1984) The zebra’s stripes: an aid to group cohesion? In: MacDonald D (ed) The encyclopedia of mammals. Facts on File Publications, New York, pp 486–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal tactics of reproduction and life-history. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (1984) Predators and predation. In: Halls LK (ed) White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Washington, DC, pp 189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Moment GB (1962) Reflexive selection: a possible answer to an old question. Science 136:262–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1980) Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. The Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 383 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2006) A predator from East Africa that chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLoS One 1(1):e132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JK (1989) Re-examining the selfish herd: are central fish safer? Anim Behav 38:1048–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L (1978) Habitat selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 351–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteur G (1982) A classificatory review of mimicry systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:169–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pough FH (1976) Multiple cryptic effects of cross-banded and ringed patterns of snakes. Copeia 1976:834–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pough FH, Janis CM, Heister JB (2002) Vertebrate life, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LL (1980) Inheritance of coat color and changes in pelage coloration in black bears in northeastern Minnesota. J Mammal 61:324–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent TD (1969) Behavioural adaptations of cryptic moths. III. Resting attitudes of two bark-like species, Melanolophia canadaria and Cotocala ultronia. Anim Behav 17:670–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller GB (1967) The deer and the tigers study life in India. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer LL (1995) Pennsylvania amphibians and reptiles. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman P (1977) Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197:1246–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan TA, Ryan JM, Czaplewski NJ (2000) Mammalogy. Saunders, New York, 565 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther FR (1969) Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in Thomson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsonsi Guenther 1884). Behaviour 34:184–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahner RH (1980b) Barking in a primitive ungulate, Muntiacus reevesi: function and adaptiveness. Am Nat 114:157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahner RH (2001) Fascinating mammals: conservation and ecology in the mid-eastern States. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zug GR, Vitt LJ, Calwell JP (2001) Herpetology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yahner, R.H. (2012). Additional Adaptations Against Predation. In: Wildlife Behavior and Conservation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1518-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics