Abstract
Whilst not prominent in psychological approaches to peace – both in Australia and internationally – ‘peacebuilding’ is an important and distinct paradigm in the multidisciplinary field of peace studies and conflict resolution. Contributions towards understanding and approaching direct violence have been more prominent with psychology than the more positive focus of peacebuilding. In this chapter, peacebuilding is presented as an important part of peace psychology into the future. This chapter provides a brief familiarisation of the peacebuilding paradigm (and how peace psychology may be situated to contribute therein). The theoretical emphasis is on the influential peacebuilding approach of scholar-practitioner John Paul Lederach, as representative of a contemporary peacebuilding paradigm that aims to develop more culturally derived, less linear and more inclusive (multi-level and multi-sectoral) approaches to peace. How reconciliation is understood and situated within the peacebuilding paradigm is also given attention because it contrasts with the more discrete treatment it receives in psychology and the Australian context. The chapter considers whether peacebuilding as a paradigm can enhance efforts by Australian scholars and practitioners to contribute to the building of a sustainable peace. An extension of this is whether we can link contemporary peacebuilding endeavours to more strategic and reflective practice – to develop, challenge or even transform our own thinking, approaches and methods for peace psychology in Australia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a fuller discussion of this debate and others relating to peace-building see: www.peace-buildinginitiative.org
- 2.
A theory of change deals with such questions as: What are the sources of the problem being addressed? What needs to change? How can change be brought about? How does a particular initiative contribute to the desired change? Who is best placed to do this?
References
Anderson, M., & Olson, L. (2003). Confronting war: Critical lessons for peace practitioners. Reflecting on peace practice project. Cambridge, MA: The Collaborative for Development Action.
Boutros, B.-G. (1992). An agenda for peace. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63(6), 540–552.
CDA Collaborative Learning Projects Reflecting on Peace Practice (RPP) Project Website. (n.d.). Last retrieved on January 10, 2011, from www.cdainc.com
CDA Collaborative Learning Projects (2009). Reflecting on Peace Practice: Participant Training Manual. CDA Collaborative Learning Projects: Cambridge, MA. Last retrieved on December 11, 2011 from: http://www.cdainc.com/cdawww/pdf/manual/rpp_training_participant_manual_rev_20090104_Pdf.pdf
Dugan, M. (1996). A nested theory of conflict. Women in Leadership, 1(1), 9–20.
Galtung, J. (1976). Three approaches to peace: Peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peacebuilding. In J. Galtung (Ed.), Peace, War and defence: Essays in peace research, Vol. II (pp. 297–298). Copenhagen, Denmark: Christian Ejlers.
Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
Lederach, J. P. (2005). The moral imagination: The Art and soul of building peace. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peacebuilding Initiative website (n.d.). Last retrieved on January 10, 2010, at www.peacebuildinginitiative.com
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2005). Contemporary conflict resolution (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Reconciliation Australia Website (n.d.). Last retrieved on January 10, 2010, from http://www.reconciliation.org.au
United Nations. (1992, June 17). Report of the secretary general. An agenda for peace (A/47/277-S/24111). Retrieved from the web on June 20, 2011, from http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpeace.html
United Nations. (1998). Report of the secretary general. Report 66. Retrieved from web (The Peacebuilding Initiative Website) on January 10, 2011, from www.peacebuildinginitiative.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miletic, T. (2012). A Peace-building Paradigm for Peace Psychology. In: Bretherton, D., Balvin, N. (eds) Peace Psychology in Australia. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1403-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1403-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1402-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1403-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)