Abstract
Population Viability Analysis (PVA) models have been used as a decision-support tool for managing wildlife populations, both game and nongame species. However, PVA models require extensive population-level data; without such data, an individual-based model (IBM) may be a more appropriate tool. The at-risk gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is one species of interest about which numerous individual studies have been published, but with little published documentation of population dynamics. Using NetLogo (http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/), the authors developed a spatially explicit IBM for the gopher tortoise population that inhabits Fort Stewart, GA, a US Army installation. The model was used to perform demographic sensitivity analyses and compare the results to sensitivity analyses conducted using a PVA model based on the same combinations of demographic parameters. The comparison showed a significant congruence in results from the two approaches. Several parameters—particularly juvenile and egg-to-age 1 mortality—appeared to disproportionately affect simulation results and are likely to be influenced by habitat manipulation. Based on their results, the authors conclude that IBMs can be useful to perform demographic sensitivity analysis and evaluate the capacity for habitat manipulation alone to provide the means for ensuring long-term persistence of gopher tortoise populations at Fort Stewart.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An operational copy of this model is available through http://extras.springer.com.
References
Alford RA (1980) Population structure of Gopherus polyphemus in northern Florida. J Herpetol 14(2):177–182
Aresco MJ, Guyer C (1999) Burrow abandonment by gopher tortoises in slash pine plantations of the Conecuh National Forest. J Wildl Manage 63(1):26–35
Ashton KG, Burke RL (2007) Long-term retention of a relocated population of gopher tortoises. J Wildl Manage 71(3):783–787
Ashton KG, Burke RL, Layne JN (2007) Geographic variation in body and clutch size of gopher tortoises. Copeia 2:355–363
Buckley D, Isebrands JG, Sharik TL (1999) Practical field methods of estimating canopy cover, PAR, and LAI in Michigan oak and pine stands. J Appl Forest 16(1):25–32
Congdon JD, Dunham AE, Loben Sels RC (1993) Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Conserv Biol 7(4):826–833
Congdon JD, Dunham AE, Loben Sels RC (1994) Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Am Zool 34(3):397–408
Diemer JE (1992) Home range and movements of the tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in northern Florida. J Herpetol 26(2):158–165
Eubanks JO, Michener WK, Guyer C (2003) Patterns of movement and burrow use in a population of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Herpetologica 59(3):311–321
Hermann SM, Guyer C, Waddle JH, Nelms MG (2002) Sampling on private property to evaluate population status and effects of land use practices on the gopher tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus. Biol Conserv 108(3):289–298
Iverson JB (1991) Patterns of survivorship in turtles (order Testudines). Can J Zool 69(2):385–391
Jones JC, Dorr B (2004) Habitat associations of gopher tortoise burrows in industrial timberlands. Wildl Soc Bull 32(2):456–464
Landers JL, Garner JA, McRae WA (1980) Reproduction of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in southwestern Georgia. Herpetologica 36(4):353–361
Lindenmayer DB, Burgman MA, Akçakaya HR, Lacy RC, Possingham HP (1995) A review of the generic computer programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for modelling the viability of wildlife metapopulations. Ecol Model 82(2):161–174
McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (2007) Estimates of minimum patch size depend on the method of estimation and the condition of the habitat. Ecology 88(6):1401–1407
McDearman W (1995) Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) soil classification for the federally listed range. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi Field Office, Jackson
Miller PS et al (2001) Preliminary population viability assessment for the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in Florida. In: Prepared by participants from gopher tortoise population viability workshop, Tallahassee, 11–12 Sept 2001 and Conservation breeding specialist group (Species Survival Commission/IUCN World Conservation Union), Apple Valley. http://www.cbsg.org/cbsg/workshopreports/23/gopher_tortoise_pva.pdf. Accessed September 2010
Mitchell M (2005) Home range, reproduction, and habitat characteristics of the female gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in southeast Georgia. M.S. thesis, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro. http://eaglescholar.georgiasouthern.edu:8080/jspui/bitstream/10518/1588/3/Mitchell_Maggie_J_200508_MS.pdf. Accessed April 2010
NatureServe (2004) Species at risk on Department of Defense installations. Revised report documentation of study for Department of Defense and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.natureserve.org/prodServices/speciesatRiskdod.jsp. Accessed April 2010
Pike DA, Seigel RA (2006) Variation in hatchling tortoise survivorship at three geographic localities. Herpetologica 62(2):125–131
Pike DA, Pizzatto L, Pike DA, Shine R (2008) Estimating survival rates of uncatchable animals: the myth of high juvenile mortality in reptiles. Ecology 89(3):607–611
Reed JM, Fefferman N, Averill-Murray RC (2009) Vital rate sensitivity analysis as a tool for assessing management actions for the desert tortoise. Biol Conserv 142(11):2710–2717
Rostal DC, Jones DN Jr (2002) Population biology of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) in southeast Georgia. Chelonian Conserv Biol 4(2):479–487
Rykiel EJ Jr (1996) Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol Model 90(3):229–244
Smith RB, Breininger DR, Larson VL (1997) Home range characteristics of radiotagged gopher tortoises on Kennedy Space Center, Florida. Chelonian Conserv Biol 2(3):358–362
Smith LL, Tuberville TD, Seigel RA (2006) Workshop on the ecology, status, and management of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, 16–17 January 2003: final results and recommendations. Chelonian Conserv Biol 5:326–330
Smith LL, Linehan JM, Stober JM, Elliott MJ, Jensen JB (2009a) An evaluation of distance sampling for large-scale gopher tortoise surveys in Georgia, USA. Appl Herpetol 6(4):355–368
Smith LL, Stober JM, Balbach HE, Meyer WD (2009b) Gopher tortoise survey handbook. Technical Report, ERDC-CERL, Champaign. Report No. ERDC/CERL TR-09-7. http://libweb.wes.army.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/CERL-TR-09-7.pdf. Accessed October 2010
Styrsky JN, Guyer C, Balbach H, Turkmen A (2010) The relationship between burrow abundance and area as a predictor of gopher tortoise population size. Herpetologica 66:403–410
Tuberville TD, Dorcas ME (2001) Winter survey of a gopher tortoise population in South Carolina. Chelonian Conserv Biol 4(1):182–186
Tuberville TD, Buhlmann KA, Balbach HE, Bennett SH, Nestor JP, Gibbons JW, Sharitz RR (2007) Habitat selection by the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). ERDC/CERL TR-07-1. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign. http://libweb.wes.army.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/CERL-TR-07-1.pdf. Accessed October 2010
Tuberville TD, Norton TM, Todd BD, Spratt JS (2008) Long-term apparent survival of translocated gopher tortoises: a comparison of newly released and previously established animals. Biol Conserv 141(11):2690–2697
Tuberville TD, Gibbons JW, Balbach HE (2009) Estimating viability of gopher tortoise populations. ERDC/CERL TR-09-2. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign. http://libweb.wes.army.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/CERL-TR-09-2.pdf. Accessed October 2010
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Department of the Interior) (1987) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). 50 CFR, Part 17, Final Rule, Federal Register 52(129):25376–25380
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Department of the Interior) (2009) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90-day finding on a petition to list the eastern population of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) as threatened. 50 CFR, Part 17, FWS-R4-ES-2009-0029; MO 9221050083-B2, Federal Register 74(173):46401–46406
Wilbur HM, Morin PJ (1988) Life history evolution in turtles. In: Gans C, Huey R (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 16b. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 396–447
Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo: computer software. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Accessed June 2009
Wilson DS (1991) Estimates of survival for juvenile gopher tortoises, Gopherus polyphemus. J Herpetol 25(3):376–379
Wilson DS, Mushinsky HR, Fischer RA (1997) Species profile: gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) on military installations in the southeastern United States. Technical Report SERDP-97-10. Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/tes/pdfs/serdp97-10.pdf. Accessed October 2010
Wright JS (1982) Distribution and population biology of the gopher tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus, in South Carolina. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Manuscript preparation was partially supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FC09-07SR22506. We thank the following for their assistance: Ron Owens at Fort Stewart provided GIS data layers for the installation, Jen Burton (ERDC) provided programming advice, and Bess Harris (SREL) assisted with running models.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuberville, T.D., Andrews, K.M., Westervelt, J.D., Balbach, H.E., Macey, J., Carlile, L. (2012). Using Demographic Sensitivity Testing to Guide Management of Gopher Tortoises at Fort Stewart, Georgia: A Comparison of Individual-Based Modeling and Population Viability Analysis Approaches. In: Westervelt, J., Cohen, G. (eds) Ecologist-Developed Spatially-Explicit Dynamic Landscape Models. Modeling Dynamic Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1257-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1257-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1256-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1257-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)