Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of European Homicide Research pp 111–135Cite as

A Review of the Cross-National Empirical Literature on Social Structure and Homicide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The purpose of this proposed chapter is twofold. First, we expand on the work of LaFree (1999), by compiling a summary of the cross-national research on social structure and homicide. Second, we provide a critical assessment of the status of this body of literature, presenting its strengths and weaknesses, noting points of convergence and divergence, and concluding with suggested directions for future research. Nearly 70 quantitative studies are included in our analysis, representing the most comprehensive list of peer-reviewed cross-national homicide studies to date. Although we are unable to draw strong general conclusions at this time, due in large part to inconsistencies in the operationalization and measurement of key theoretical constructs, it does appear that the literature may be beginning to converge in some key respects. On the other hand, our review also suggests that existing macrolevel explanations may not generalize across space and time. We use these conclusions to inform our suggestions for future research in attempting to determine the variation of national homicide rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The age range that constituted “youth population” varied in the studies reviewed, though as noted by Land et al. (1990) several variations on the definition of this percentage are highly correlated, thus, “the particular age range used in a given study is not likely to be of great importance” (f.n. 9).

References

  • Agha, S. (2009). Structural correlates of female homicide: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 576–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altheimer, I. (2008). Social support, ethnic heterogeneity, and homicide: A cross-national approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2007). A cross-national test of Bonger’s theory of criminality and economic conditions. Criminology, 45, 925–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D., & Gartner, R. (1984). Violence and crime in cross-national perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, W. R., & Loring, P. L. (1986). Population diversity and cross-national homicide: The effects of inequality and heterogeneity. Criminology, 24, 733–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (2006). Why is violent crime so common in the Americas? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 442–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. R. (1991a). Development and crime: A cross-national time series analysis of competing models. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. R. (1991b). Routine activities: A cross-national assessment of a criminological perspective. Social Forces, 70, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. R., & Lynch, J. P. (1990). Does a difference make a difference? Comparing cross-national crime indicators. Criminology, 28, 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, B., & Cochran, J. K. (2008a). A cross-national test of institutional anomie theory: Do the strength of other social institutions mediate or moderate the effects of the economy on the rate of crime. Western Criminology Review, 9, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, B., & Cochran, J. K. (2008b). Want amid plenty: Developing and testing a cross-national measure of anomie. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1979). Inequality, crime and public policy. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Braithwaite, V. (1980). The effect of income inequality and social democracy on homicide. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2005). Ascribed economic inequality and homicide among modern societies: Toward the development of a cross-national theory. Homicide Studies, 9(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2006). Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 10, 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. K., & Bjerregaard, B. (2011). Structural anomie and crime: A cross-national test. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. H., & Gramajo, A. M. (2009). Homicide rates in a cross-section of countries: Evidence and interpretations. Population and Development Review, 35, 749–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, G. H., & Simpson, M. E. (1985). A demographic approach to the cross-national study of homicide. Comparative Social Research, 8, 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A., & Zawitz, M. W. (1998). Homicide trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55, 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R., & Parker, R. N. (1990). Cross-national evidence on homicide and the age structure of the population. Social Forces, 69, 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, W. B., McCleary, R., & Newman, G. R. (1985). Religion, modernization, and world crime. Comparative Social Research, 8, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. B., & Quigley, J. M. (1982). Population heterogeneity and the sociogenesis of homicide. Social Forces, 61, 206–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, N., Cao, L., Wells, W., & Maguire, E. R. (2003). Forces of production and direction: A test of an expanded model of suicide and homicide. Homicide Studies, 7, 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G. J., Newman, G., & Pridemore, W. A. (2000). Theory, method, and data in comparative criminology (Criminal justice 2000, volume 4: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice, pp. 139–211). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. S. W. (1995). A cross-national analysis on the effect of moral individualism on murder rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. S. W. (2001). A research note on reporting discrepancies in international homicide data. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 25, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & Richardson, A. M. (2008). Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Studies, 12, 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F. (2006). Religious cosmologies and homicide rates among nations. Journal of Religion and Society, 8, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kick, E. L., & LaFree, G. (1985). Development and the social context of murder and theft. Comparative Social Research, 8, 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killias, M., & Aebi, M. F. (2000). Crime trends in Europe from 1990 to 1996: How Europe illustrates the limits of the American experience. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahn, H., Hartnagel, T. F., & Gartrell, J. W. (1986). Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-national data and criminological theories. Criminology, 24, 269–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D. (1976). Inequality, unemployment and crime: A cross-national analysis. Sociological Quarterly, 17, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D. (1978). A Durkheimian analysis of international crime rates. Social Forces, 57, 654–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., & Wellford, C. F. (1977). A static and dynamic analysis of crime and the primary dimensions of nations. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 5, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. (1999). A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 125–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G., & Drass, K. A. (2002). Counting crime booms among nations: Evidence for homicide victimization rates, 1956 to 1998. Criminology, 40, 769–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G., & Kick, E. L. (1986). Cross-national effects of developmental, distributional, and demographic variables on crime: A review and analysis. International Annals of Criminology, 24, 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G., & Tseloni, A. (2006). Democracy and crime: A multilevel analysis of homicide trends in forty-four countries, 1950–2000. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, S. F. (1984). Trends in violence and aggression: A cross-national analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 25, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, G. C. (1992). General evolution and Durkheim’s hypothesis of crime frequency: A cross-cultural test. Sociological Quarterly, 33, 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D., Loayza, N., & Menendez, A. M. (2002). Violent crime: Does social capital matter? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 509–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. R. (2001). Population growth, economic inequality, and homicide. Deviant Behavior, 22, 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. R., & Bankston, W. B. (1999). Political structure, economic inequality, and homicide: A cross-national analysis. Deviant Behavior, 19, 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. (1995). Economic development, social control, and murder rates: A cross-national approach. Cross-Cultural Research, 1995, 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, F., Bond, M. H., & Bond, M. K. (2005). Linking societal and psychological factors to homicide rates across nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 515–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. (2007). Does democracy increase crime? The evidence from international data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, L. (1976). The sociology of law and order. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (1980). Income inequality and murder rates: Some cross-national findings. Comparative Social Research, 3, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (1982). Societal development, social equality, and homicide: A cross-national test of a Durkheimian model. Social Forces, 61, 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (1985). Sex differences in arrest rates for homicide: An application of the general theory of structural strain. Comparative Social Research, 8, 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (1986). Modernization, structural characteristics, and societal rates of crime: An application of Blau’s macrosociological theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 27, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (1989). Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality. American Sociological review, 54, 597–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Shrock, P. (2002). Reassessing the cross-national relationship between income inequality and homicide rates: Implications of data quality control in the measurement of income distribution. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Sutton, G. M. (2010). Poverty, infant mortality, and homicide rates in cross-national perspective: Assessments of criterion and construct validity. Criminology, 48(2), 509–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces, 75, 1393–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. L. (1994). Cross-national variation in homicides: The case of Latin America. International Criminal Justice Review, 4, 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. L. (1996). Cross-national crime data: Some unaddressed problems. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. L. (1997). Homicides in developing nations: Results of research using a large and representative sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41, 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. L. (1998). Cross-national variation in homicides: Is race a factor? Criminology, 36, 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. L. (1999). A comparative analysis of nations with low and high levels of violent crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Good policy can lower violent crime: Evidence from a cross-national panel of homicide rates, 1980–1997. Journal of Peace Research, 40, 619–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, S. T., Corzine, J., Burnett, C., & Poyer, T. (1992). Modernization, age structure and regional context: A cross-national study of crime. Sociological Spectrum, 12, 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F. C., & Gartner, R. (1995). Age structure, socio-political institutions, and national homicide rates. European Sociological Review, 11, 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F. C., & Williamson, J. B. (2001). Age patterns of suicide and homicide mortality rates in high-income nations. Social Forces, 80, 251–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, P. P., & Felson, R. (2010). Income inequality, poverty, and crime across nations reexamined. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2002). Social support and homicide: A cross-national test of an emerging criminological theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41, 611–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pridemore, W. A. (2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pridemore, W. A. (2011). Poverty matters: A reassessment of the inequality-homicide relationship in cross-national studies. British Journal of Criminology forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridemore, W. A., & Trent, C. L. S. (2010). Do the invariant findings of Land, McCall, and Cohen generalize to cross-national studies of social structure and homicide? Homicide Studies, 14(3), 296–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R. (1965). Suicide, homicide, and economic development. Social Forces, 43, 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. L., & Singer, J. D. (1973). Measuring the concentration of power in the international system. Sociological Methods and Research, 1, 403–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R., & Messner, S. F. (1991). The social sources of homicide in different types of societies. Sociological Forum, 6, 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38, 1021–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaible, L. M., & Hughes, L. A. (2011). Crime, shame, reintegration, and cross-national homicide: A partial test of reintegrative shaming theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 104–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shichor, D. (1990). Crime patterns and socioeconomic development: A cross-national analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 15, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2009a). Correlates of national-level homicide variation in post-communist East-Central Europe. Social Forces, 87, 1423–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2009b). Contributions of cross-national research to criminology at the beginning of the 21st century. In M. D. Krohn, A. J. Lizotte, & G. Penly (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unnithan, N. P., & Whitt, H. P. (1992). Inequality, economic development and lethal violence: A cross-­national analysis of suicide and homicide. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 33, 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wilsem, J. (2004). Criminal victimization in cross-national perspective: An analysis of theft, violence and vandalism across 27 countries. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellford, C. F. (1974). Crime and the dimensions of nations. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 2, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, P. (1971). Crime and development: An international comparison of crime rates. Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, 3, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Carol L. S. Trent

  2. Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA

    William Alex Pridemore

Authors
  1. Carol L. S. Trent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Alex Pridemore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol L. S. Trent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Dept. of Criminal Law and Criminology, Leiden University, Steenschuur 25, Leiden, 2311 ES, Netherlands

    Marieke C. A. Liem

  2. , Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University, Sycamore Hall 302, Bloomington, 47405, USA

    William Alex Pridemore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trent, C.L.S., Pridemore, W.A. (2012). A Review of the Cross-National Empirical Literature on Social Structure and Homicide. In: Liem, M., Pridemore, W. (eds) Handbook of European Homicide Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0466-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation