Skip to main content

Bootstrapping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Living Standards Analytics

Part of the book series: Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences ((SSBS))

Abstract

It is rarely sufficient simply to present estimates of means, coefficients, or poverty rates that have been calculated based on survey data. We also need measures of the variability of these measures, so that we may judge how much confidence to have in them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The poverty rate is a proportion; because this distribution is nonnormal it would be more appropriate to use a χ 2 test in this case. For large samples, such as the one here, the use of a t-test will give a similar result, and for the purposes of this chapter we also wanted to illustrate the use of the t-test in this context.

References

  • Cameron, Colin, and Pravin Trivedi. 2009. Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Russell. 2009. Reliable inference for the Gini index. Journal of Econometrics 150: 30–40.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Russell, and Emmanuel Flachaire. 2007. Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for inequality and poverty measures. Journal of Econometrics 141: 141–166.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Russell, and Emmanuel Flachaire. 2008. The wild bootstrap, tamed at last. Journal of Econometrics 146: 162–169.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7(1): 1–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. 2003. Second thoughts on the bootstrap. Statistical Science 18(2): 135–140.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., and R.J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, Jonathan, and Shahidur Khandker. 2009. Handbook on poverty and inequality. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamanou, Gisele, and Jonathan Morduch. 2002. Measuring vulnerability to poverty, Discussion Paper No. 2002/58. World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, Lars, and Kuan Xu. 1999. Poverty intensity: How well do Canadian provinces compare? Canadian Public Policy-Analyse de Politiques 25(2): 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, Lars, and Kuan Xu. 2000. International comparisons of poverty intensity: Index decomposition and bootstrap inference. Journal of Human Resources 25(1): 51–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stata Corporation. 2009. Stata 11.0 manual. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Haughton .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haughton, D., Haughton, J. (2011). Bootstrapping. In: Living Standards Analytics. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0385-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics