Abstract
Spinal and cardiovascular surgeries impart mechanical [1] or ischemic [2] stress to the spinal cord. To prevent spinal cord injury due to surgical stress, the intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function is important. Until the 1960s, there were no available spinal cord function monitoring methods. In the late 1960s, a novel tool for monitoring spinal cord function became available; it recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) from the scalp. In this technique, the electrical potentials evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation are recorded on an electroencephalogram (EEG). The short-latency component of SEPs may indicate cervical spinal cord function in waveforms (latencies and amplitudes) [3].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35:E465–70.
Mell MW, Wynn MM, Reeder SB, Tefera G, Hoch JR, Acher CW. A new intercostal artery management strategy for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Surg Res. 2009;154:99–104.
Ikuta T, Furuta N, Kihara S, Okura M, Nagamine I, Nakayama H, et al. Differences in waveforms of cerebral evoked potentials among healthy subjects, schizophrenics, manic-depressives and epileptics. J Med Invest. 2007;54:303–15.
Vodusek DB. Interventional neurophysiology of the sacral nervous system. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001;31:239–46.
Grundy EL, Nash Jr CL, Brown RH. Arterial pressure manipulation alters spinal cord function during correction of scoliosis. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:249–53.
Carenini L, Bottacchi E, Camerlingo M, Mamoli A. Considerations after intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1989;10:315–20.
Dimitrijevic MR, Halter JA. Atlas of human spinal cord potentials. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995.
Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T. Epidural recording of spinal electrogram in man. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol. 1971;30:236–9.
Aida S, Shimoji K. Descending pathways in spinal cord stimulation and pain control. In: Bountra C, Munglani R, Schmidt WK, editors. Pain: current understanding, emerging, therapies, and novel approaches to drug discovery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 101–17.
Magladery LW, Porter WE, Park AM, Teasdall RD. Electroencephalogical studies of nerve reflex activity in normal man. IV. The two-neuron reflex and identification of certain action potentials from spinal roots and cord. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1951;88:499–519.
Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Shimizu H. Wave-form characteristic and special distribution of evoked spinal electrogram in man. J Neurosurg. 1977;46:304–13.
Shimoji K, Willis Jr WD. Evoked spinal potentials. Tokyo: Springer; 2006.
Becske T, Nelson PK. The vascular anatomy of the vertebro-spinal axis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2009;20:259–64.
de Haan P, Kalkman CJ, de Mol BA, Ubags LH, Veldman DJ, Jacobs MJ. Efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked myogenic potentials to detect spinal cord ischemia during operations for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:87–100.
Tobita T, Denda S, Takada T, Endoh H, Baba H, Yamakura T, et al. Effects of fentanyl on spinal cord potentials and electromyogram evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in man. In: Hashimoto I, Kakigi R, editors. Recent advances in human neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Excepta medica; 1998. p. 1034–7.
Ubags LH, Kalkman CJ, Been HD, Koelman JH, Ongerboer de Visser BW. A comparison of myogenic motor evoked responses to electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:568–72.
Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Ito Y, Masuko K, Maruyama M, Iwane T, et al. Interaction s of cord sdorsum potential. J App Physiol. 1976;40:79–84.
Kawanishi Y, Munakata H, Matsumori M, Tanaka H, Yamashita T, Nakagiri K, et al. Usefulness of transcranial motor evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:456–61.
Kawaguchi M, Sakamoto T, Inoue S, Kakimoto M, Furuya H, Morimoto T, et al. Low dose propofol as a supplement to ketamine-based anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials. Spine. 2000;25:974–9.
Macdonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:347–77.
Legatt AD. Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: results of a survey. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:454–60.
Ellen R. Grass Lecture: motor evoked potential monitoring. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2004;44:223–43.
Novak K, de Camargo AB, Neuwirth M, Kothbauer K, Amassian VE, Deletis V. The refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons in man and its implications for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1931–41.
Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.
Di Lazzaro V, Thickbroom GW, Pilato F, Profice P, Dileone M, Mazzone P, et al. Direct demonstration of the effects of repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation at I-wave periodicity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:1193–7.
MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:416–29.
Kano T, Shimoji K. The effects of ketamine and neuroleptanalgesia on the evoked electrospinogram and electromyogram in man. Anesthesiology. 1974;40:241–6.
Scheufler K-M, Zentner J. Total intravenous anesthesia for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways: an integral view combining clinical and experimental data. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:571–9.
Johanscn JW, Sebcl PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1336–44.
Criou A, Monchi M, Joly LM, Bellenfant F, Claessens YE, Thébert D, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by aortic blood flow determination: evaluation of the Sometec Dynamo-3000 system. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2066–72.
Kakinohana M, Nakamura S, Fuchigami T, Miyata Y, Sugahara K. Influence of the descending thoracic aortic cross clamping on bispectral index value and plasma propofol concentration in humans. Anesthesioligy. 2006;104:939–43.
Dahaba AA. Different conditions that could results in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect hypnotic state. Anesth Analg. 2006;101:765–73.
Fujioka H, Shimoji K, Tomita M, Denda S, Takada H, Homma T, et al. Spinal cord potential recordings from the extradural space during scoliosis surgery. Br I Anaesth. 1994;73:350–6.
Kondo K, Harada H, Kaneko S, Tyama K, Kano T. Intraoperative monitoring of the conductive evoked spinal cord potentials under deep hypothermia. J Electrodiag Spinal Cord. 1996;18:160–2.
Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T, et al. Electrical management of intractable pain. Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 1971;20:444–7.
Shimoji K, Fujiwara N, Sato Y. Development of the system and electrode for simultaneous measurements of regional blood flow, oxygen pressure and electrical activity [in Japanese]. Byotai Seiri. 1986;11:876–80.
Kano T, Shimoji K. Influence of anesthesia on intraoperative monitoring of SCEPs. In: Dimitrijevic MR, Halter JA, editors. Atlas of human spinal cord evoked potentials. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995. p. 97–106.
Hayatsu K, Tomita M, Fujihara H, et al. The placement of the epidural catheter at the predicted site by electrical stimulation test. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1035–9.
Shimoji K. Overviews of human (evoked) spinal cord potentials (SCPs): recording methods and terminology. In: Shimoji K, Willis Jr WD, editors. Evoked spinal cord potentials – An illustrated guide to physiology, pharmacology, and recording techniques. Tokyo: Springer; 2006. p. 40–9.
Yates BJ, Thompson FJ, Mickle JP. Origin and properties of spinal cord field potentials. Neurosurgery. 1982;11:439–50.
Schmidt RF. Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate central nervous system. Ergeb Physiol Biol Chem Exp Pharmakol. 1971;63:20–101.
Beall JE, Applebaum AE, Forman RD, Willis WD. Spinal cord potentials evoked by cutaneous afferents in the monkey. J Neuroophysiol. 1977;40:199–211.
Shimoji K, Kano T, Higashi H, et al. Evoked spinal electrograms recorded from epidural space in man. J Appl Physiol. 1972;33:468–71.
Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Ito Y, et al. Interactions of human cord dorsum potential. J Appl Physiol. 1976;40:79–84.
Tanaka E, Tobita T, Murai Y, et al. Thiamylal antagonizes the inhibitory effects of dorsal column stimulation on dorsal horn activities in humans. Neurosci Res. 2009;64:391–6.
Maruyama Y, Shimoji K, Shimizu H, et al. Human spinal cord potentials evoked by different sources of stimulation and conduction velocities along the cord. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48:1098–107.
Bernhard DG. The spinal cord potentials in leads from the cord dorsum in relation to peripheral source of afferent stimulation. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953;29 Suppl 106:1–29.
Eccles JC, Schmidt R, Willis WD. Pharmacological studies on presynaptic inhibition. J Physiol (Lond). 1963;168:500–30.
Shimoji K, Ito Y, Ohama K, Sawa T, Ikezono E. Presynaptic inhibition in man during anesthesia and sleep. Anesthesiology. 1975;43:388–91.
Maruyama Y, Shimoji K, Shimizu H, et al. Effects of morphine of human spinal cord and peripheral nervous activities. Pain. 1980;8:63–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Techniques and Physiology
Appendix: Techniques and Physiology
Introduction
The development of the catheter electrode has made it possible to stimulate the spinal cord epidurally and to record epidurally human spinal cord potentials for monitoring spinal cord function during an operation [35].
The Catheter Electrodes
Human spinal cord potentials (SCPs) can be recorded from the Âepidural space using the same catheter used in continuous epidural block. The epidural catheter electrode can be made simply by insertion of a stainless steel wire through the epidural catheter approximately 5 mm beyond its tip (Appendix Fig. 6.9a). This simple catheter has been used for the recording of spinal cord potentials in patients during surgical operations or in patients with spinal cord diseases and are also used for simulation of spinal cord. An epidural catheter with three orifices on the side and three platinum wire electrodes was developed in our laboratory for multiple applications (Appendix Fig. 6.9b, c), including monitoring of spinal cord potentials, measurement of epidural pressure and epidural tissue blood flow, epidural spinal cord stimulation, and epidural injection of drugs [36].
Accurate insertion of the catheter electrode at the required site in the epidural space is critical for these applications. We have been using three methods to determine the proper placement of the catheter electrodes in the posterior epidural space: (1) epidural electrical stimulation test, (2) recording of the spinal cord potentials evoked by stimulation of the segmental, heterosegmental nerves, or dorsal cord [11, 37, 38], and (3) image examination such as X-ray, MRI, or CT scan.
When the catheter electrodes are situated in the posterior epidural space on the midline, stimulation through the catheter electrodes produces the bilateral twitches of the segmental muscles. When it produces unilateral muscle twitches in the same spinal segment, the electrodes might be situated laterally in the epidural space. By this stimulation test, you can verify the spinal segment of the position and laterality of the catheter electrode in the epidural space. When the catheter electrode is situated in the anterior epidural space, polarity of the segmental SCPs is reversed as expected. Laterality of the catheter electrodes in the epidural space can also be judged by the waveform characteristics of the SCPs. When the catheter electrodes are situated ipsilateral to the stimulated peripheral nerves and close to the roots, the initial positive spikes and P2 wave are recorded larger than those recorded contralateral to the nerves.
The procedure used to introduce the catheter electrodes into the epidural space is the same as methods used to place catheters for continuous epidural anesthesia [35]. The patients are placed in the lateral position and flexed to open the interspaces of the vertebral column. After making a skin wheal aseptically and injecting 0.5–1.0% lidocaine (5 mL), a 16–18 gauge Tuohy needle is inserted into the epidural space using the paramedian approach, with the bevel parallel to the sagittal plane and targeting the predicted segment. When the tip of the Tuohy needle is located in the epidural space, the direction of the bevel is adjusted, and the catheter electrode is inserted approximately 5 cm into the epidural space. The tip of the catheter electrode and the skin surface electrode are connected, respectively, to the negative and positive outlets of an electrical nerve stimulator [38]. Using these electrodes, recordings can be done at several spinal levels (Appendix Fig. 6.10).
Origins of Each Component of the Segmental SCPs
The initially positive spike, P1, of the segmental SCPs is believed to be a reflection of the extracellular events associated with the propagation of action potentials through the roots into the spinal cord [11, 39, 40]. The generation of an action potential at a node of Ranvier creates a positive capacitive current, which is conducted electrotonically down the axon. This current is responsible for the initial positivity of the triphasic spike (Appendix Fig. 6.11a). The capacitative current is also responsible for depolarizing the cell membrane at the next node to threshold, thereby initiating the production of an action potential here. The rising phase of the action potential is generated by an influx of Na+ into the axon from the extracellular space. The loss of Na+ causes the extracellular space to become negatively charged; this event is recorded as the negative component of the triphasic spike (Appendix Fig. 6.11b). The falling phase of an action potential is due to a K+ efflux from the axon into the extracellular space. The additional positivity in the extracellular space is recorded from the cord dorsum as the second positive component of the triphasic spike (Appendix Fig. 6.11b).
The negative waves, N1, of the segmental SCPs (Appendix Fig. 6.11c) are thought to be reflections of changes in the extracellular environment produced by activity of dorsal horn interneurons (see also Appendix Fig. 6.12). When the interneurons are synaptically activated, positive ionic current leaves the extracellular space at the synapses (sinks) and reappears along the ventrally projecting axons of the cells (sources). Thus, the dorsal horn takes on a negative charge and the ventral horn takes on a positive charge [39].
The slow positive wave, P2, of the segmental SCPs (Appendix Fig. 6.12d) has been demonstrated as the extracellular manifestation of the process of primary afferent depolarization (PAD) just as observed in the spinal animals (Appendix Fig. 6.12) [11, 37, 39–49]. Positive ionic current leaves the extracellular space at excited axo-axonal synapses (sinks) and reappears along the primary afferents (sources). Thus, the dorsal most portion of the spinal cord becomes positively charged (Appendix Fig. 6.11d) [11, 39–42, 49, 50].
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aida, S., Kohno, T., Shimoji, K. (2012). Spinal Cord Stimulation Techniques. In: Koht, A., Sloan, T., Toleikis, J. (eds) Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0308-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0308-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0307-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0308-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)