Skip to main content

Cost Analysis of Prototyping Major Weapons Systems

  • Conference paper
  • 154 Accesses

Abstract

IDA performed a major study of acquisition for the Department of Defense, Effective Initiatives in Acquiring Major Systems. The study concerned the highly-publicized cost and schedule overruns that have plagued defense programs. Since the 1960s, the Defense Department and defense contractors have pioneered reviews and management initiatives to improve program outcomes. IDA reviewed program outcomes to determine whether there is a trend toward better outcomes overall, whether any specific management initiatives have improved outcomes, and what improvements could be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tyson, Karen W., J. Richard Nelson, Neang I. Om, Paul R. Palmer, Jr., “Acquiring Major Systems: Cost and Schedule Trends and Acquisition Initiative Effectiveness.” Institute for Defense Analyses, Paper P-2201, March 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wartzman, Rick, “Designer of Stealth Fighter Says U.S. Runs Risk of Losing Technological Edge,” Wall Street Journal, February 4, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, G. K., A. A. Barbour, T. L. McNaugher, M. Rich, and W. L. Stanley. “The Use of Prototypes in Weapon System Development.” The RAND Corporation, R-2345-AF, March 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gogerty, David C, J. Richard Nelson, Bruce M. Miller, and Paul R. Palmer, Jr., “Acquisition of Contemporary Tactical Munitions,” 2 Volumes, Institute for Defense Analyses, Paper P-2173, October 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harmon. Bruce R., and Lisa M. Ward. “Methods for Assessing Acquisition Schedules of Air-Launched Missiles,” Institute for Defense Analyses, Paper P-2274, November 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harmon, Bruce R., Lisa M. Ward, and Paul R. Palmer. “Assessing Acquisition Schedules for Tactical Aircraft,” Institute for Defense Analyses, Paper P-2105, February 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harmon, Bruce R., J. Richard Nelson, Mitchell S. Robinson, Katherine L. Wilson, and Steven R. Shyman. “Military Tactical Aircraft Development Costs.” 5 Volumes, Institute for Defense Analyses, Report R-339, September 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yates, Edward H., W. Eugene Waller, and Lern G. Vaughn. “A Parametric Approach to Estimating Cost of Development Engineering,” Applied Research Inc., ARI/87 TM-387, September 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tyson, K.W., Nelson, J.R., Gogerty, D.C., Harmon, B.R., Salerno, A. (1992). Cost Analysis of Prototyping Major Weapons Systems. In: Gulledge, T.R., Hutzler, W.P., Lovelace, J.S. (eds) Cost Estimating and Analysis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2936-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2936-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7727-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2936-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics