Skip to main content

Abstract

In Ch. 14 plant canopies are treated as big leaves. We did not worry about their structure or the details of how the leaves make up the canopy, we just assumed that we could find a canopy conductance for vapor and boundary layer conductances for heat and vapor. Combining these with the absorbed radiation and soil heat flux densities allowed us to compute canopy temperatures and transpiration rates. We even estimated carbon assimilation rates by knowing transpiration rate or light interception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, M. C., J.M. Norman, G.R. Diak, W.P. Kustas, and J.R. Mecikalski (1997) A two-source time-integrated model for estimating surface fluxes using thermal infrared remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 60:195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G. S. (1986) Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 36:317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G.S. (1990) Derivation of an angle density function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 49:173–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G. S. and F. K. van Evert (1994) Light interception by plant canopies: efficiency and architecture. In J. L. Monteith, R. K. Scott, and M. H. Unsworth, Resource Capture by Crops. Nottingham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, T,N., W.J. Capehart, and R.R. Gillies (1995) A new look at the simplified method for remote sensing of daily evapotranspiration. Remote Sensing of Environment 54:161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.M. 1996. Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 80:135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassnacht, K.S., S.T. Gower, J.M. Norman, and R.E. McMurtrie (1994) A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 71:183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs. M., G. Stanhill, and S. Moreshet (1976) Effect of increasing foliage and soil reflectivity on the solar radiation balance of wide-row sorghum. Agronomy Journal 68:865–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan, J. (1977) Crop micrometeorology: a simulation study. Simulation Monographs, Pudoc, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan, J. (1988) The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 43:155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, J., G.S. Campbell, J.M. Norman, D.W. Graham, and W.K. Kovalick (1992) Prediction and measurement of soil bidirectional reflectance. IEEE Transactions of Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 30:249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusk, A. (1991) The hot spot effect in plant canopy reflectance. In Photon-Vegetation Interactions: Applications in Optical Remote Sensing and Plant Ecology. Eds. R.B. Myneni and J. Ross. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuusk, A. (1995) A fast, invertible canopy reflectance model. Remote Sensing of Environment. 51:342–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, J.L. and M.H. Unsworth. (1990) Principles of Environmental Physics. Edward Arnold Publishers, London. 291 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myneni, R.B. and J. Ross. (eds.) (1991) Photon-Vegetation Interactions: Applications in Optical Remote Sensing and Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 565 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J.M. (1992) Scaling processes between leaf and canopy levels. In Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. Eds. J.R. Ehleringer and C.B. Field. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, CA pp. 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J.M. and G.S. Campbell (1989) Canopy structure. In Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation. Eds. R.W. Pearcy, J. Ehleringer, H.A. Mooney, and P.W. Rundel. Chapman and Hall, N.Y. pp. 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J.M. and J.M. Welles (1983) Radiative transfer in an array of canopies. Agronomy Journal 75:481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walthall, C.L., J.M. Norman, J.M. Welles, G.S. Campbell, and B.L. Blad (1985) Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. Applied Optics. 24:383–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welles, J.M. (1990) Some indirect methods for determining canopy structure. Remote Sensing Reviews. 5:31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, G.S., Norman, J.M. (1998). The Light Environment of Plant Canopies. In: An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1626-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1626-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94937-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1626-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics