Skip to main content

The Ecodesign of Complex Electromechanical Systems: Prioritizing and Balancing Performance Fields, Contributors and Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2412 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

Abstract

In the Product Development (PD) of complex mechanical and electromechanical systems, such as machine-tools, mapping the relationships between technical behavior, environmental and cost impacts brings new challenges. Having technological advances, cost drivers and environmental performance under surveillance, manufacturers and designers are expected to provide eco-efficient systems keeping a competitive price. This introduces a new set of design functions with increased complexity due to the new interdependent variables, requiring complementary technical, environmental and cost assessments. The redesign study of a sheet metal forming machine-tool, a press brake, is here used by the authors to present the first assessment of a proper methodology to support the main decision processes and to illustrate the technical and technological trade-offs faced by a PD team in order to achieve the global design objectives. The design process aimed to reduce the environmental footprint of the machine-tool and simultaneously to improve the bending process accuracy. A Voice of Customer (VOC) study was carried out in order to assess the receptiveness of press-brake users to the targeted product specifications and price changes sensitivity. The research effort was mainly focused in defining and testing the applicability of different assessment and measurement tools for the Ecodesign of a press-brake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azevedo M, Oliveira MI, Pereira JP Reis A (2011) Comparison of two LCA methodologies in the machine-tools environmental performance improvement process. In: Proceedings of 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Braunschweig, 2–4 May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala A, Raugei M, Benveniste G, Gazulla C, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2010) Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung W-H, Okudan G, Wysk RA (2011) Modular design to optimize product life cycle metrics in a closed-looped supply chain. In: Proceedings of the 2011 industrial engineering research conference, Reno 21–25 May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Devoldere T, Dewulf W, Deprez W, Duflou JR (2008) Energy related environmental impact reduction opportunities in machine design: case study of a laser cutting machine,In: Proceedings of the CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Sydney, pp 412–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietmair A, Verl A (2010) Energy consumption assessment and optimization in the design and use phase of machine tools, In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Anhui, 19–21 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent Centre, Ecoinvent 2.0 database. Accessed Oct 2010, www.ecoinvent.ch

  • Erbe T, Król J, Theska R (2008). Mineral casting as material for machine base-frames of precision machines. In: Proceedings of 23rd annual meeting of the american society for precision engineering and the twelfth ICPE, Portland, 19–24 Oct 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudice F, La Rosa G, Risitano A (2006) Product design for the environment: a life cycle approach. Taylor and Francis, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gutowski T, Dahmus J Thiriez A (2006) Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes, In: Proceedings of 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Leuven, May 31–Jun 2, pp 623–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschorner E, Finnveden G (2003) Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellens K, Dewulf W, Overcash M, Hauschild M, Duflou JR (2012) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing) Part 1: methodology description. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:69–78. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0340-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhrke B, Schrems S, Eisele C, Abele E (2010) Methodology to assess the energy consumption of cutting machine tools, In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Anhui, May 19-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris GA (2001) Integrating life cycle cost analysis and LCA. Int J LCA 6(2):118–121. doi:org/10.1007/BF02977849

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira MI, Santos JP, Almeida FG, Reis A, Pereira JP, Rocha AB (2011) Impact of laser-based technologies in the energy-consumption of metal cutters: comparison between commercially available system, In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on sheet metal, Leuven, 18–20 Apr 2011. Published on key engineering materials, vol 473, pp 809–815, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.473.809

  • Peças P, Ribeiro I, Folgado R, Henriques E (2009) A life cycle engineering model for technology selection: a case study on plastic injection moulds for low production volumes. J Clean Prod 17(9):846–856. ISSN 0959-6526. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pré-consultants, Report: ‘The eco-indicator 99—a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment’. http://www.pre.nl. Accessed Oct 2011

  • Pré-consultants, Simapro 7.0 software. http://www.pre.nl. Accessed Oct 2011

  • Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010a) Transitioning to sustainable production—Part I: application on machining technologies. J Cleaner Prod 18:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010b) Transitioning to sustainable production—Part II: evaluation of sustainable machining technologies. J Cleaner Prod 18:1211–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos JP, Oliveira MI, Almeida FG, Reis A, Pereira JP Rocha AB (2011) Improving the environmental performance of machine-tools: influence of technology and throughput on the electrical energy consumption of a press-brake. J Cleaner Prod 19(4):356–364. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.009

  • Shamsuzzoha AHM (2011) Modular product architecture for productivity enhancement. Bus Process Manag J 7:21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd JA, Curran MA (1999) Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from the SETAC North America streamlined LCA workgroup: society of environmental toxicology and chemistry (SETAC) and SETAC foundation for environmental education

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007), Study for preparing the first working plan for the ecodesign directive; report: ENTR/06/026; Dec 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Umeda Y, Fukushige S, Tonoike K, Kondoh S (2008) Product modularity for life cycle design. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:13–16. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vezzoli C, Manzini E (2008) Design for environmental sustainability, Springer, ISBN-13:978-1849967419

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Esteves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esteves, S., Oliveira, M., Almeida, F., Reis, A., Pereira, J. (2014). The Ecodesign of Complex Electromechanical Systems: Prioritizing and Balancing Performance Fields, Contributors and Solutions. In: Henriques, E., Pecas, P., Silva, A. (eds) Technology and Manufacturing Process Selection. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5544-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5544-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5544-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics