Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1416 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an historical overview of non-radiative interactions of charged particles with matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An excellent review of the development of experiment and theory leading to the Standard Model can be found in the compilation of lectures, given at a 1985 symposium held at Fermilab, provided by Brown et al. (1989).

  2. 2.

    And also referred to as ‘beauty’.

  3. 3.

    They are also all subject to the gravitational force, but, as demonstrated by Table 1.1, this force is inconsequential and will be neglected.

  4. 4.

    To the ‘outside world’, a composite of quarks does not exhibit colour. This is achieved, in the case of the meson which is made up of two quarks, by a colour/anti-colour pair and, in the case of the baryon made up of three quarks, by quarks with red, green and blue colour.

  5. 5.

    The ‘W’ refers to the ‘weak force’ and the ‘Z’ refers to ‘zero’ charge. The W ± and Z 0 bosons have masses of about 80 GeV and 91 GeV, respectively, and hence, the weak force has an extremely short range. In contrast, the photon has zero mass leading to the electromagnetic force having infinite range.

  6. 6.

    The neutral pion decays predominantly through the electromagnetic process π 0 2γ and, less frequently, through π 0→ γ + e + + e .

  7. 7.

    Isotopic spin (or ‘isospin’) was proposed as a new quantum number by Heisenberg in 1932 due to the near equality of the rest masses of the proton and neutron, allowing consideration of them as being two quantum states of the same particle, the nucleon. It is an additive quantum number and is conserved in strong interactions. It is not conserved in weak interactions as shown in the β-decay of the neutron of Fig. 1.3.

  8. 8.

    On its own, this would not be a conclusive argument for the existence of the colour quantum number. However, measurements of high-energy electron–positron annihilations demonstrate that the ratio of the cross section at which these annihilations produce hadrons to that at which they produce muon pairs is consistent with the existence of the colour quantum number with three states. Similar confirmation is obtained from measurements of the decay of the neutral pion to two photons.

  9. 9.

    The particle’s minimum energy will in fact equalise to the thermal energy at equilibrium which will be greater than zero.

  10. 10.

    As these moved in the direction opposite to the cathode rays, we now recognise that these have a positive electric charge. While Goldstein was unable to observe a deflection of these canal rays by a magnetic field, Wien was subsequently able to do so by using a very strong magnetic field and thus demonstrated their positive charge. Further, using combined electrostatic and magnetic fields, he concluded that some of these canal rays had a mass comparable to that of hydrogen; hence, this was one of the first pieces of experimental evidence of the existence of the proton in motion. Being what we now know as positive ions, canal rays had a far more complex composition than the cathode rays which we now know as electrons (Thomson 1913).

  11. 11.

    This was a refutation of the hypothesis that the cathode ray (or electron) was a wave in the aether, not the de Broglie wave–particle duality hypothesis.

  12. 12.

    A review of the theory and phenomenology of α-decay is provided by Chapter 4 of McParland (2010); that of β-decay can be found in that same chapter and in the comprehensive review by Grotz and Klapdor (1990) and the classic text by Lipkin (1962).

  13. 13.

    Whereas in our previous discussion of Thomson’s discovery of the electron we had used e as the symbol of the electric charge of the entity discussed – and which was entirely appropriate as that is the electric charge carried by the electron – we will now use q as the generic symbol for electric charge. In our nomenclature of the interactions of charged particles with matter, the projectile will have an electric charge ze where z is an integer equal to 1 or greater and the target will be assigned an electric charge Ze where, again, Z is an integer equal to 1 or greater.

  14. 14.

    That this is the case demonstrated by the existence of transitions between nuclear states with zero angular momentum (0 → 0) resulting in IC, whereas electromagnetic (0 → 0) transitions without the involvement of an electron are impossible since there are no multipoles with zero angular momentum in the radiation field. See Section 4.4.3 of McParland (2010) for a proof of this derived using perturbation theory.

  15. 15.

    This was not the only time that Meitner had been supplanted or excluded in a major physics discovery, as will be discussed later in the synopsis of the discovery of nuclear fission.

  16. 16.

    For convenience, we will group Auger, Coster–Krönig and super Coster–Krönig non-radiative transitions as Auger transitions in later discussions.

  17. 17.

    Refer to Chapter 3 of McParland (2010) for the derivation of the mass parabolae and the β±-decays that reach the stable nucleus at the minimum of the parabola.

  18. 18.

    Being an Austrian Jew, Meitner had been forced to leave Germany for Sweden following the Anschluss in 1938. She continued to collaborate with Hahn and Strassmann and during Christmas of 1938, with her nephew Otto Frisch, modelled fission on the basis of Bohr’s liquid-drop model of the nucleus and accurately calculated that the resulting fission fragments would carry a net kinetic energy of about 200 MeV due to both mass defect and Coulomb repulsion. Hahn received the 1945 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the discovery, but Meitner did not. Controversy over that decision remains.

  19. 19.

    Frisch was staying at the Bohr Institute when he performed these measurements there. Also staying there was an American biologist, William A Arnold, who was approached by Frisch to describe the division of cell. Arnold replied that this was ‘binary fission’ and Frisch adopted the term ‘fission’ to describe the process he had just measured.

  20. 20.

    The Crookes tube is a partially evacuated tube in which electrons are created through the ionisation of residual air by a high-tension supply. These are accelerated by this potential between that cathode and anode.

  21. 21.

    This is a step-up transformer in which the primary coil is connected to an interruptible DC voltage. The change in the primary voltage causes a voltage in the secondary coil through induction.

  22. 22.

    There has been a suggestion that Nikola Tesla may have detected x-rays prior to Röntgen (Hrabak et al. 2008).

  23. 23.

    The primary beam being the α-particles incident to the beryllium and the secondary beam being the neutral radiation incident to the medium.

  24. 24.

    Experiment does, however, play a role in determining parameters used in modifications to the theoretical derivation.

  25. 25.

    The notion of electrons ‘orbiting’ the nucleus only became considered with the development by Bohr of his model of the atom.

  26. 26.

    The Born series is derived in Chap. 2 as a means of solving the Lippmann–Schwinger equation.

  27. 27.

    The problems associated with the second-order Born series for the Coulomb interaction are discussed in Chap. 4. Correction terms to account for conditions unmanageable by the first-order term of the Born expansion are derived in Chap. 11.

  28. 28.

    Upon reflection, this is a rather profound judgment on Bethe’s part considering his having been awarded the 1967 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of the stellar energy production mechanism, his significance in the development of nuclear weaponry and his later political challenges to their use and his deep and wide work in nuclear physics.

  29. 29.

    The current Internet sites for these codes are:

  30. 30.

    In such a case, the electron beam current within the accelerator must be reduced for patient safety from that used for x-ray therapy by a factor of about 103, as the latter current is higher due to the low efficiency of bremsstrahlung production at electron energies used for radiotherapy.

  31. 31.

    Details of the roles of RBE and OER can be found in Chapters 6 and 7 of Hall and Giaccia (2006).

  32. 32.

    One solution is the mounting of the cyclotron on the rotating gantry. In practice, this would require the cyclotron to have an especially intense magnetic field in order to reduce its size and, hence, the use of superconducting magnetic coils.

  33. 33.

    In this case, the pion (or its wavefunction) entering the nucleus is ‘real’ and the effects of its rest mass are cogent. Pions mediating the strong nuclear force within the nucleus are ‘virtual’ and do not contribute to the same result.

  34. 34.

    ‘Fast’ neutrons are defined as those with an energy of the order of 1 MeV. These are moderated as they pass through a hydrogenous medium (such as tissue) through (n,p) elastic scatters until they ‘thermalise’.

  35. 35.

    The Lawrences, mother had been diagnosed with a pelvic tumour with the prognosis of a 3-month survival. Following the neutron therapy, she survived for sixteen years.

  36. 36.

    The mean free path length is derived in Chap. 6.

Bibliography and Further Reading

  • Bohr N, Thorsen J. Niels Bohr – Collected works, vol 8: The penetration of charged particles through matter (1912–1948). Amsterdam: North-Holland Physics Publishing; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis NP. Lawrence and Oppenheimer. New York: Da Capo Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbert JC, Eckelman WC, Neumann RD, editors. Nuclear medicine – diagnosis and therapy. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug E, Nakel W. The elementary process of bremsstrahlung. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitler W. The quantum theory of radiation. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron JL. The scattering of α and β particles and Rutherford’s atom. Arch Hist Exact Sci. 1967;17:247–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore R. Niels Bohr. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes R. The making of the atomic bomb. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segrè E. Enrico Fermi – Physicist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund P. Particle penetration and radiation effects. Berlin: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sime RL. Lise Meitner – a life in physics. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ, Thomson GP. Conduction of electricity through gases, vol II: Ionisation by collision and the gaseous discharge. 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press; 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D. Rutherford – simple genius. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Allen C, Bloyce A, Bell T. The effect of ion implantation on the sliding wear behaviour of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene against an oxidized titanium alloy Ti-6A1–4V. Tribol Lett. 1995;1:35–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreo P. Monte Carlo techniques in medical radiation physics. Phys Med Biol. 1991;36:861–920.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Attix FH. Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. New York: Wiley; 1986.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becquerel H. Sur les propriétés différentes des radiations invisibles émises par ltes sels de l'uranium et du rayonnement de la paroi anticathodique d'un tube de Crookes. Comp Rend. 1896;122:702–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becquerel H. Sur la déviabilité et la nature de certains rayons émis par le radium et le polonium. Comp Rend. 1903;136:199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethe HA. Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie. Ann Phys. 1930;5:324–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F. Zur Bremsung rasch bewegter Teilchen beim Durchgang durch Materie. Ann Phys. 1933;16:285–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. On the theory of the decrease of velocity of moving electrified particles on passing through matter. Philos Mag. 1913;25:10–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. On the decrease of velocity of swiftly moving electrified particles in passing through matter. Philos Mag. 1915;30:581–612.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. Scattering and stopping of fission fragments. Phys Rev. 1940;58:654–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. The penetration of atomic particles through matter. Mat Fys Medd Dan Vid Selsk. 1948;18(8):1–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N, Bøggild JK, Brostrøm KH, Lauritsen T. Velocity-range relation for fission fragments. Phys Rev. 1940;58:839–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Born M. Zur quantenmechanik der Stovorgänge. Z Physik. 1926;37:863–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell CA, Brechbiel MW. Auger electrons: lethal, low energy, and coming to a tumor cell nucleus near you. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1946–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg WH, Kleeman R. On the alpha particles of radium, and their loss of range in passing through various atoms and molecules. Philos Mag. 1905;10:318–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brailsford JF. Roentgen’s discovery of x rays. Br J Radiol. 1946;19:453–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LM, Dresden M, Hoddesson L, editors. Pions to quarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick J. Possible existence of a neutron. Nature. 1932;129:312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cirrilli M. Hadron therapy: collaborating for the future. CERN Cour. 2011;51:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristy M, Eckerman KF. Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various energies from internal photon sources, vols I–VII. Report ORNL/TM-8381. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curie P. Action du champ magnétique sure les rayons de Becquerel. Rayons déviés et rayons non déviés. Comp Rend. 1900a;130:73–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curie P. Sur la pénétration des rayons de Becquerel non déviables par le champ magzlétique. Comp Rend. 1900b;130:76–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CG. A theory of the absorption and scattering of the α rays. Philos Mag. 1912;23:901–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfest P, Oppenheimer JR. Note on the statistics of nuclei. Phys Rev. 1931;37:333–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faddegon B, Ross CK, Rogers DWO. Measurements of collision stopping powers of graphite, aluminium and copper for 10 and 20 MeV electrons. Phys Med Biol. 1992;37:1561–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming JS, Perkins AC. Targeted radiotherapy. IPEM Report 83. York: Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaisser TK. Cosmic rays and particle physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger H, Marsden E. On a diffuse reflection of the α-particles. Proc R Soc. 1909;A82:495–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerward L. Paul Villard and his discovery of gamma rays. Phys Perspect. 1999;1:367–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman GB, Skarsgard LD, Thompson GB, Harrison R, Lam GJ, Ludgate C. Pion therapy at TRIUMF. Treatment results for astrocytoma grades 3 and 4: a pilot study. Radiother Oncol. 1990;17:21–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grotz K, Klapdor HV. The weak interaction in nuclear, particle and astrophysics. Bristol: IOP Publishing; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka H, Nagakawa Y. Clinical results of long surviving brain tumor patients who underwent boron neutron capture therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;28:1061–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howell RW. Radiation spectra for Auger-emitting radionuclides. Med Phys. 1992;19:1371–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabak M, Padovan RS, Kralik M, Ozretic D, Potocki K. Nikola Tesla and the discovery of x-rays. Radiographics. 2008;28:1189–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy – an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Technical Report Series No 398. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Oxford: Pergamon; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU. Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of x or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures. ICRU Report No 24. Bethesda: International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements; 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report 37 – Stopping Powers for Electrons and Positrons. Bethesda: ICRU; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report 49 – Stopping Powers and Ranges for Protons and Alpha Particles. Bethesda: ICRU; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäkel O, Krämer M, Karger CP, Debus J. Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy: clinical implementation and application. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46:1101–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The physics of radiology. 4th ed. Springfield: CC Thomas; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karger CP, Jäkel O, Palmans H, Kanai T. Dosimetry for ion beam radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:R193–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knipp J, Teller E. On the energy loss of ions. Phys Rev. 1941;59:659–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krimigis SM, Armstrong TP, Axford WI, Bostrom CO, Fan CY, Gloeckler G, Lanzerotti LJ. The low energy charged particle (LECP) experiment on the Voyager spacecraft. Space Sci Rev. 1977;21:329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb WE. Passage of uranium fission fragments through matter. Phys Rev. 1940;58:696–702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lattes CMG, Muirhead H, Occhialini GPS, Powell CF. Processes involving charged mesons. Nature. 1947;159:694–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Brown GE. Hans Albrecht Bethe. 2 July 1906 – 6 March 2005: Elected ForMemRS 1957. Biogr Mems Fell R Soc. 2007;53:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkin HJ. Beta decay for pedestrians. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg M, Strand S-E, King MA, editors. Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine – applications in diagnostic imaging. Bristol: Institute of Physics; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger R, Budinger T, Watson E. MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • McParland BJ. Nuclear medicine radiation dosimetry: advanced theoretical principles. London: Springer; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44:335–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mould RF, Hobday PA. Radiation dosimetry for the Amersham caesium 137 manual afterloading system for gynaecological brachytherapy. Amersham: Amersham International plc; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I. The Principia. Translated by Andrew Motte (1995). Amherst: Prometheus Books; 1687.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology). http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/star/index.cfm (2012). Accessed February 2012.

  • Noddack I. Über das element 93. Z fur Ange Chemie. 1934;47:653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins PH, Fowler DH. The possibility of the therapeutic applications of beams of negative pi-mesons. Nature. 1961;189:524–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell CF, Fowler PH, Perkins DH. Study of elementary particles by the photographic method. Oxford: Pergamon; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • PTCOG (Particle Therapy Co-operative Group). http://ptcog.web.psi.ch/Archive/Patientenzahlen-updateMay2011.pdf (2011). Accessed November 2011.

  • Robins B. New principles of gunnery. London; 1742.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSICC (Radiation Safety Information Computational Center). C00228 SPAR, Calculation of stopping powers and ranges for muons, charged pions, protons and heavy ions. http://rsicc.ornl.gov (1985). Accessed March 2012.

  • Rutherford E. On the electrification of gases exposed to Röntgen rays, and the absorption of Röntgen radiation by gases and vapours. Philos Mag. 1897;43:241–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E. Uranium radiation and the electrical conduction produced by it. Philos Mag. 1899;47:109–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E. The magnetic and electric deviation of the easily absorbed rays from radium. Philos Mag. 1903;5:177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E. The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philos Mag. 1911;21:669–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E. Collisions of α particles with light atoms. IV. An anomalous effect in nitrogen. Philos Mag. 1919;37:581.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E, Royds T. The nature of the α-particle from radioactive substances. Philos Mag. 1909;17:281–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatori M, Indovina L, Mansi L. Targeted α-particle therapy: a clinical overview. Clin Radiopharm. 2008;1:251–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater JD. Clinical applications of proton radiation treatment at Loma Linda University: review of a fifteen-year experience. Tech Cancer Res Treat. 2006;5:81–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EM, Harris CC, Rohrer RH. Calculation of local energy deposition due to electron capture and internal conversion. J Nucl Med. 1965;7:23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRIM (The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter). http://www.srim.org/ (2012). Accessed February 2012

  • Stabin MG. Fundamentals of nuclear medicine dosimetry. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabin MG, Watson EE, Cristy M, Ryman JC, Eckerman KF, Davis JL, Marshall D, Gehlen MK. Mathematical models and specific absorbed fractions of photon energy in the nonpregnant female and at the end of each trimester of pregnancy. Report ORNL/TM-12907. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strutt RJ. The absorption of the Becquerel rays by solid and gaseous bodies. Nature. 1900;61:539–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ. Cathode rays. Philos Mag. 1897;44:293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ. Conduction of electricity through gases. 2nd ed. Cambridge: University Press; 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ. Rays of positive electricity. Proc R Soc. 1913;A89:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ, Rutherford E. On the passage of electricity through gases exposed to Röntgen rays. Philos Mag. 1896;42:392–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Essen CF, Bagshaw MA, Bush SE, Smith AR, Kigerman MM. Long-term results of pion therapy at Los Alamos. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13:1389–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigner E. On the mass defect of helium. Phys Rev. 1933;43:252–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RR. Radiological use of fast protons. Radiology. 1946;47:487–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XG, Eckerman KF. Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukawa H. On the interaction of elementary particles. I. Proc Phys Math Soc Jpn. 1935;17:48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi H, Sgouros G, editors. Therapeutic applications of Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine. Bristol: Institute of Physics; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler JF. Handbook of stopping cross-sections for energetic ions in all elements, The stopping and ranges of ions in matter, vol. 5. New York: Pergamon Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler JF. The stopping of energetic light ions in matter. J Appl Phys. 1999;85:1249–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler JF, Srinivasin GR (eds). Terrestrial cosmic rays and soft errors. IBM J Res Dev. 1996;40:1–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McParland, B.J. (2014). Introduction. In: Medical Radiation Dosimetry. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5403-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5403-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5402-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5403-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics