Skip to main content

Multi-objective Ant Colony Optimization Method to Solve Container Terminal Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

Abstract

The river and maritime transport represents an attractive alternative to land and air transport. The containerization allows the industries to save costs thanks to the standardization of dimensions. The container terminal has to manage container traffic at the crossroads of land road and railway. In this chapter, we propose to optimize, simultaneously, the storage problem and the quayside transport problem. In a space storage, we have several blocks and each one has its storage cost. The first aim is to minimize the cost storage of containers. These latter are loaded into vessels, the vehicles have to transport the containers from blocks to quays (of vessels). Thus, the second aim consists to minimize the distance between the space storage and the quays. The optimization methods of operations research in container terminal operation have become more and more important in recent years. Objective methods are necessary to support decisions. To solve this multi-objective problem, we develop two resolution methods based on metaheuristic approach called ant colony algorithm. The first one is multi-objective ant colony optimization (noted MOACO) and the second one is the MOACO with a local search (called MOACO-LS), good promising results are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belmecheri F, Cagniart T, Amodeo L, Yalaoui F (2009) Modelling and optimization of empty container reuse: a real case study. In: IEEE proceedings of the international conference of computers and industrial engineering, Troyes, pp 1106–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • De Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Handling strategies for import containers at marine terminals. Transp Res B 27(2):151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Doener K, Hartl RF, Teimann M (2003) Are competants more competent for problem solving? The case of full truckload transportation. Eur J Oper Res 11(2):79–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 26(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugardin F, Yalaoui F, Amodeo L (2009) New multi-objective method to solve reentrant hybrid flow shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 203(1):22–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evers JJM, Koppers SAJ (1996) Automated guided vehicle traffic control at a container terminal. Transp Res A 30(1):21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella L, Taillard E, Agazzi G (1999) MACS-VRPTW: a multiple ant colony system for vehicle routing problems with time windows. Orne D, Dorigo M, Glover F (eds) McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravel M, Price WL, Gagn C (2002) Scheduling continuous casting of aluminum using a multiple objective ant colony optimization metaheuristic. Eur J Oper Res 143(1):218–229

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holguin-Veras J, Jara-Diaz S (1999) Optimal pricing for priority service and space allocation in container ports. Transp Res-B 33(3):81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2003) Berth allocation with service priority. Transp Res B 37(5):437–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim HB (1998) The optimal determination of the space requirement and the number of transfer cranes for import containers. Comput Ind Eng 35(3–4):427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim HB (1999a) Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int J Prod Econ 59(1–3):415–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim KY (1999b) An optimal routing algorithm for a transfer crane in port container terminals. Transp Sci 33(1):17–33

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim KY (1999c) Routing straddle carriers for the loading operation of containers using a beam search algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 36(1):106–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Kim HB (2002) The optimal sizing of the storage space and handling facilities for import containers. Transp Res B 36(9):821–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Park KT (2003) A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers. Eur J Oper Res 148(1):92–101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kozan E, Preston P (1999) Genetic algorithms to schedule container transfers at multimodal terminals. Int Trans Oper Res 6(3):311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CL, Cai X, Lee CY (1998) Scheduling with multiple-job-on-one-processor pattern. IIE Trans 30:433–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Park YM, Kim KH (2003) A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. OR Spectr 25(1):1–23

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riise A (2002). Comparing genetic algorithm and tabu search for multi-objective optimization. In: IFORS conference, Edinburgh-UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenken D, Vob S, Stahlbock, R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research- A Classification and Literature Review. Spectrum 26(1):3–49

    Google Scholar 

  • T’kindt V, Monmarch N, Tercinet F, Lagt D (2002) An ant colony optimization algorithm to solve a 2-machine bicriteria flow shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 142(2):250–257

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden M, Ebben M, Gademann N, Van Harten A (2002) Scheduling vehicles in automated transportation systems: algorithms and case study. OR Spectrum 24:31–58

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3(4):257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu J, Wan YW, Murty KG, Linn RJ (2003) Storage space allocation in container terminal. Transp Res B 37(10):883–903

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Yalaoui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belmecheri-Yalaoui, F., Yalaoui, F., Amodeo, L. (2014). Multi-objective Ant Colony Optimization Method to Solve Container Terminal Problem. In: Benyoucef, L., Hennet, JC., Tiwari, M. (eds) Applications of Multi-Criteria and Game Theory Approaches. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5295-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5295-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5294-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5295-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics