Skip to main content

Burn-in for Heterogeneous Populations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

In the previous chapters, we discussed the burn-in procedures for homogeneous populations. When the failure rate of a population is decreasing or bathtub-shaped (BT), burn-in can be usually justified. Note that, as mentioned and illustrated earlier, the heterogeneity of populations is often a reason for the decrease in the resulting failure rate, at least, in some time intervals. In this chapter, the optimal burn-in procedures are investigated without assuming that the population failure rate is BT. We consider the mixed population composed of two ordered subpopulations—the subpopulation of strong items (items with ‘normal’ lifetimes) and that of weak items (items with shorter lifetimes). In practice, weak items may be produced along with strong items due to, for example, defective resources and components, human errors, unstable production environment, etc. In the later part of this section, we will also consider the continuous mixtures model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Badía FG, Berrade MD, Clemente AC (2002) Aging properties of the additive and proportional hazard mixing models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 78:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Block HW, Mi J, Savits TH (1993) Burn-in and mixed populations. J Appl Probab 30:692–702

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Block HW, Mi J, Savits TH (1994) Some results in burn-in. Statistica Sinica 4:525–534

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Block HW, Savits TH (1997) Burn-in. Stat Sci 12:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Block HW, Savits TH, Wondmagegnehu ET (2003) Mixtures of distributions with increasing linear failure rates. J Appl Probab 40:485–504

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cha JH (2000) On a better burn-in procedure. J Appl Probab 37:1099–1103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cha JH (2001) Burn-in procedures for a generalized model. J Appl Probab 38:542–553

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cha JH (2005) On optimal burn-in procedures—a generalized model. IEEE Trans Reliab 54:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cha JH (2006) An extended model for optimal burn-in procedures. IEEE Trans Reliab 55:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2010) Burn-in by environmental shocks for two ordered subpopulations. Eur J Oper Res 206:111–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2010) Stochastically ordered subpopulations and optimal burn-in procedure. IEEE Trans Reliab 59:635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2011) Burn-in and the performance quality measures in heterogeneous populations. Eur J Oper Res 210:273–280

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2012) Burn-in and the performance quality measures in continuous heterogeenous populations. J Risk Reliab 226:417–425

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2013) Burn-in for heterogeneous populations: how to avoid large risks. Commun Stat—Theory Methods

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clarotti CA, Spizzichino F (1990) Bayes burn-in and decision procedures. Probab Eng Inf Sci 4:437–445

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Finkelstein M (1992) Some notes on two types of minimal repair. Adv Appl Probab 24:226–228

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Finkelstein M (2008) Failure rate modelling for reliability and risk. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Finkelstein M (2009) Understanding the shape of the mixture failure rate (with engineering and demographic applications). Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 25:643–663

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta RC, Warren R (2001) Determination of change points of nonmonotonic failure rates. Commun Stat—Theory Methods 30:1903–1920

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Gurland J, Sethuraman J (1995) How pooling failure data may reverse increasing failure rate. J Am Stat Assoc 90:1416–1423

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen F, Petersen NE (1982) Burn-in. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang R, Murthy DNP (1998) Mixture of weibull distributions—parametric characterization of failure rate function. Appl Stoch Models Data Anal 14:47–65

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kececioglu D, Sun F (2003) Burn-in testing: its quantification and optimization. DEStech Publications, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klugman SA, Panjer HH, Willmot GE (2004) Loss models: from data to decisions. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mi J (1991) Optimal burn-in. PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mi J (1994) Burn-in and maintenance policies. Adv Appl Probab 26:207–221

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Mi J (1996) Minimizing some cost functions related to both burn-in and field use. Oper Res 44:497–500

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Mi J (1997) Warranty policies and burn-in. Naval Res Logist 44:199–200

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Mi J (2002) Age-replacement policy and optimal work size. J Appl Probab 39:296–311

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Mi J (2003) Optimal burn-in time and eventually IFR. J Chin Inst Ind Eng 20:533–542

    Google Scholar 

  31. Navarro J, Hernandez PJ (2004) How to obtain bathtub-shaped failure rate models from normal mixtures. Probab Eng Inf Sci 18:511–531

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Finkelstein .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finkelstein, M., Cha, J.H. (2013). Burn-in for Heterogeneous Populations. In: Stochastic Modeling for Reliability. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5028-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5028-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5027-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5028-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics