Skip to main content

Offshoring and Outsourcing of Customer-Oriented Business Processes: An International Transaction Value Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Offshoring Challenge

Abstract

Business processes that involve information processing and human interaction raise unique issues of geography and governance. To explain outsourcing and offshoring decisions by firms, we develop a model of international transaction value that integrates resource-based theory, location economics, and transaction costs theory. This firm-level model provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding and testing the conditions for effective outsourcing and offshoring of customer-oriented business processes (COBP). In addition to establishing static conditions that should favor greater or lesser degrees of outsourcing and offshoring, the model also provides pathways to suggest how preferences will change under alternative circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this context, outsourcing refers to the contracting of a previously internal business process to unaffiliated parties outside the firm, while offshoring, often of the same knowledge-based activities, refers to locating activities in a foreign country, whether through an affiliated (captive) supplier or through an unaffiliated supplier or outsourcer (Murtha 2004).

  2. 2.

    The term “touch points” may be somewhat misleading, as touch points can involve a human touch (a telephone call from or to a sales representative), a technology-based touch (a mass-produced email or a customer visit to a website), or a media-based touch (exposure to an advertisement or direct mail piece).

  3. 3.

    We use the terms capabilities and competencies as defined in Tallman (2003). A capability is an intangible firm-specific resource composed of a complex set of interacting assets and processes. These may be more or less central to the competitive advantage of a firm. A core competency is an unique organizational capability that can be shared across units of a corporation to generate competitive advantage in a variety of settings, and that tends to characterize the firm. The range of COBP in an industry may involve a variety of capabilities, some core, others less so for any particular firm. However, COBP are likely to be core competencies only for firms actually involved in providing these services as their primary business.

  4. 4.

    Note that popular parlance still frequently fails to differentiate outsourcing and offshoring. Popular concerns are primarily with offshore value production, but popular terminology describes the governance decision. As scholars make the distinction found in Fig. 6.1, perhaps this will change in the wider parlance.

References

  • Anderson JC, Narus JA (1995) Capturing the value of supplementary services. Harvard Business Review 73 (Jan/Feb):75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2006) If in doubt, farm it out. The Economist 379(8480):6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron R, Singh JV (2005) Getting offshoring right. Harvard Bus Rev 83(12):135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay LA, Gray SJ (2001) Upgrading the diamond of developing countries through inward FDI: the case of four MNEs in the information service industry of Barbados. Manage Int Rev 41(4):333–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy J, Quelin BV (2006) Complexity of outsourcing contracts and ex post transaction costs: an empirical investigation. J Manage Stud 43:1775–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasty C (2006) The bitter taste of offshoring. Customer Relationship Management Magazine, 11–12 Jan. Accessed online at www.destinationCRM.com

  • Bernstel JB (2006) Wowing the customer. Bank Mark 38(4):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ Sci 12(2):198–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ, Casson M (1976) The future of the multinational enterprise. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunyaratavej K, Hahn ED, Doh JP (2007) International offshoring of services: a parity study. J Int Manage 13(1):7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calliano R, Carpano C (2000) National systems of technological innovation, FDI, and economic growth: the case of Ireland. Multinational Bus Rev 8(2):16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4(16):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cool LC (1988) How to give good phone: telephone techniques to increase your power, profits, and performance. Plume, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Couto V, Divakaran A (2006) How to be an outsourcing virtuoso. Strategy Bus 44:42–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Datamonitor (2006) Company spotlight: Sprint Nextel. Market Watch Telecoms, 5(3):15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Landaker P (2000) Beyond “Hello”: a practical guide for excellent telephone communication and quality customer service. Now Hear This, Inc., Aurora, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Day GS (2003) Creating a superior customer-relating capability. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 44(3):77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh JP (2005) Offshore outsourcing: implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. J Manage Stud 42(3):695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh JP, Bunyaratavej K, Hahn ED (2008) Separable but not equal: The location determinants of discrete offshoring activities. J Int Bus Stud 40:926–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1988) The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. J Int Bus Stud 19(1):1–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeledo I, Sivakumar K (1998) Foreign market entry mode choice of service firms: a contingency perspective. J Acad Mark Sci 26(4):274–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli MK (1990) Entry mode choice in service industries. Int Mark Rev 7(5):50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Foss K (2005) Resources and transaction costs: how property rights economics furthers the resource-based view. Strateg Manage J 26:541–553

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Knudsen T (2003) The resource-based tangle: towards a sustainable explanation of competitive advantage. Manage Decis Econ 24:291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenheim E (2003) Dell drops some tech calls to India. 24 Nov http://news.cnet.com/Dell-drops-some-tech-calls-to-India/2100-1022_3-5110933.html

  • Geyskens I, Steenkamp J-B, Kumar N (2006) Make, buy, or ally: a transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Acad Manage J 49(3):519–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P (2001) Distance still matters: the hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Bus Rev 79(8):137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson S (2006) BPO: the next frontier. eWeek 23(12):54

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf M, Mudambi SM (2005) The outsourcing of IT-enabled business processes: a conceptual model of the location decision. J Int Manage 11(2):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm S (2006) IBM wakes up to India’s skills. Business Week Online, 5 June 2006. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_23/b3987098.htm

  • Heide JB (1994) Inter-organizational governance in marketing channel. J Mark 58:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff C (2005) Accent on training. Workforce Manage 84(3):54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. Strateg Manage J 26:395–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK (1993) Market orientation: antecedents and consequence. J Mark 57(3):53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen PDØ, Pedersen T (2008) Offshoring of advanced and complex tasks. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BC, Manyika JM, Yee LA (2005) The next revolution in interactions. McKinsey Quarterly Online, 4, www.mckinseyquarterly.com

  • Kedia BL, Mukherjee D (2009) Understanding offshoring: a framework based on disintegration, location and externalization advantages. J World Bus 44(3):250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli AK, Jaworski BJ (1990) Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J Mark 54(2):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe M, Murray JY (2004) Global sourcing strategy and sustainable competitive advantage. Ind Mark Manage 33:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe M, Murray JY, Javalgi R (1998) Global sourcing of services and market performance: an empirical investigation. J Int Mark 6(4):10–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin AY, Couto V (2007) Next generation offshoring: the globalization of innovation. Duke Center for International Business Education and Research, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock CH (1996) Services marketing, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhok A (1996) The organization of economic activity: transaction costs, firm capabilities, and the nature of governance. Organ Sci 7(5):577–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok A (1997) Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm. Strateg Manage J 18(1):39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok A, Tallman S (1998) Resources, transactions and rents: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organ Sci 9(3):326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarem SC, Mudambi SM, Podoshen JS (2009) Satisfaction in technology-enabled service encounters. J Serv Mark 23(3):134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masood A (2007) The limits of offshore outsourcing. Mortgage Banking 67(6):70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer C, Schwager A (2007) Understanding customer experience. Harvard Bus Rev 85(2):116–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithas S, Whitaker J (2007) Is the world flat or spiky? Information intensity, skills, and global service disaggregation. Inf Syst Res 18(3):237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi R (2007) Offshoring: economic geography and the multinational firm. J Int Bus Stud 38(1):206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JY, Kotabe M (1999) Sourcing strategies of US service companies: a modified transaction-cost analysis. Strateg Manage J 20(9):791–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtha TP (2004) The metanational firm in context: competition in knowledge-driven industries. In: Cheng J, Hitt M (eds) Advances in international management: theories of the multinational enterprise, vol 16. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, pp 101–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf M (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource based view. Strateg Manage J 14(3):179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster WR (2007) Who’s on the line? India call center agents pose as Americans for U.S.-outsourced firms. Ind Relat 46(2):271–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyndt J, Pedersen T (2006) Managing global offshoring strategies: a case approach. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB, Hilmer FG (1994) Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Managet Rev Summer, pp 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Read BB (2001) European locations forecast: mixed. Call Cent Mag 14(7):104–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed S, Brady D, Einhorn B (2005) Rolls-Royce at your service. Business Week Online 3959:92–25 (14 Nov)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson R, Marshall JN (1999) Teleservices, call centres and urban and regional development. Serv Ind J 19(1):96–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch A, Heide JB (1997) Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future applications. J Mark 61(4):30–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth JN, Parvatiyar A (1995) Relationship marketing in consumer markets: antecedents and consequences. J Acad Mark Sci 23(4):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SiliconIndia (2007) U.S. loses jobs, blames India. SiliconIndia online 10(2):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman S (2003) Dynamic capabilities. In: Faulkner D, Campbell A (eds) The oxford handbook of strategy, vol 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 372–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman S (2004) John Dunning’s eclectic model and the beginnings of global strategy. In: Cheng J, Hitt M (eds) Advances in international management: managing multinationals in a knowledge economy, vol 15. Elsevier Ltd, pp 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Tata Telecom (2003a) The backlash. Buzz@Outsourcing Newsletter. www.tatatelecom.com/outsourcing. Accessed online 25 June

  • Tata Telecom (2003b) In the pipeline. Buzz@Outsourcing Newsletter. www.tatatelecom.com/outsourcing. Accessed 10 December

  • Taylor P, Bain P (2005) India calling to the far away towns. Work Employ Soc 19(2):261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan R (1992) Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make. Harvard Bus Rev 70(6):98–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. Quart J Econ 80(2):190–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker G, Weber D (1984) A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Adm Sci Q 29:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker J, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2007) Does offshoring impact customer satisfaction? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010457

  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) World Development Indicators 2005. World Bank, Washington (DC)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung R (2005) Making offshoring happen. Accountancy 135(1340):55–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad Manage J 38:341–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac EJ, Olsen CP (1993) From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. J Manage Stud 30(1):131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, Berry LL (1985) Problems and strategies in services marketing. J Mark 49(4):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Tallman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tallman, S., Mudambi, S.M. (2013). Offshoring and Outsourcing of Customer-Oriented Business Processes: An International Transaction Value Model. In: Pedersen, T., Bals, L., Ørberg Jensen, P., Larsen, M. (eds) The Offshoring Challenge. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4908-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4908-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4907-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4908-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics