Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Industrial Control ((AIC))

  • 1967 Accesses

Abstract

The growing acceptance of the CPM technology in some industries is due to the awareness that control software is recognised to be a capital asset that should be maintained, monitored and revised routinely. Control systems permanently showing top performance significantly reduce or even avoid product-quality degradation, loss of energy resources, waste of production, lost production time and shortened lifetimes for plant components. The CPM field has now matured to the point where a large number of industrial applications and some commercial algorithms and/or vendor services are available for control performance auditing or monitoring. The primary purpose of this chapter is to present an overview of CPM industrial applications and (available) software products. A comprehensive overview of published CPM applications to industrial processes and commercially available CPM products are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bode CA, Ko BS, Edgar TF (2004) Run-to-run control and performance monitoring of overlay in semiconductor manufacturing. Control Eng Pract 12:893–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desborough L, Miller R (2002) Increasing customer value of industrial control performance monitoring—Honeywell’s experience. AIChE Symp Ser 98(326):153–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarsma G, Nikolaou M (2000) Multivariate controller performance monitoring: lessons from an application to snack food process. www.chee.uh.edu/faculty/nikolaou/FryerMonitoring.pdf

  • Hägglund T (1999) Automatic detection of sluggish control loops. Control Eng Pract 7:1505–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris TJ (1989) Assessment of closed loop performance. Can J Chem Eng 67:856–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris T, Boudreau F, MacGregor JF (1996a) Performance assessment using of multivariable feedback controllers. Automatica 32:1505–1518

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harris T, Seppala CT, Jofriet PJ, Surgenor BW (1996b) Plant-wide feedback control performance assessment using an expert-system framework. Control Eng Pract 4:1297–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoo KA, Piovoso MJ, Schnelle PD, Rowan DA (2003) Process and controller performance monitoring: overview with industrial applications. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 17:635–662

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horch A (2000) Condition monitoring of control loops. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton EC, Foley MW, Kwok KE (2003) Performance assessment of level controllers. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 17:663–684

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Shah SL (1999) Performance assessment of control loops. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo AJ (2001) Process controller loop performance assessment. Hydrocarbon Process April:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingimundarson A (2003) Dead-time compensation and performance monitoring in process control. PhD thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Jämsa-Jounela S-L, Poikonen R, Halmevaara K (2002) Evaluation of level control performance. In: Proc IFAC world congress, Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelali M (2006c) An overview of control performance assessment technology and industrial applications. Control Eng Pract 14:441–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jofriet P, Seppala C, Harvey M, Surgenor B, Harris T (1995) An expert system for control loop performance analysis. In: Proc annual meeting, technical section, Canadian pulp and paper association, pp B41–B49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K-H, Tamayo EC, Huang B (2010) Industrial implementation of controller performance analysis technology. Control Eng Pract 18:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Whiteley JR, Rhinehart RR (2003) A relative performance monitor for process controllers. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 17:685–708

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM, Timmons CF, Desborough LD (1998) CITGO’s experience with controller performance monitoring. In: Proc NPRA computer confer, San Antonio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa S (1998) A data analysis and graphical representation system for control loop performance assessment. In: Proc TAPPI process control confer, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen J, Read D, Blekkenhorst H, Roche AA (1996) A mill prototype for automatic monitoring of control loop performance. In: Proc control systems, Halifax, Canada, pp 171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan RS, Shah SL (2002) Issues in performance diagnostics of model-based controllers. J Process Control 12:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulonis MA, Cox JW (2003) A practical approach for large-scale controller performance assessment, diagnosis, and improvement. J Process Control 13:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanfelj N, Marlin TE, MacGregor JF (1993) Monitoring and diagnosis of process control performance: the single-loop case. Ind Eng Chem Res 67:856–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill NF, Cox J, Paulonis M (2003a) Diagnosis of plant-wide oscillation through data-driven analysis and process understanding. Control Eng Pract 11:1481–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaught R, Tippet J (2001) Control performance monitoring: shaman or saviour. Pulp & Paper Canada 102:26–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jelali, M. (2013). Industrial CPM Technology and Applications. In: Control Performance Management in Industrial Automation. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4546-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4546-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4545-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4546-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics