Abstract
The final and most challenging objective of applying performance assessment methods and indices should always be to suggest measures to improve the control or process/plant performance. Even in the case where the loop is found to work at acceptable performance level, it is useful to know how the performance can be improved to attain top level. In this chapter, possible performance improvement measures are briefly discussed. Some paradigms and strategies for monitoring the performance of complex process-control systems are introduced. A comprehensive control-performance assessment procedure is proposed combining different methods described throughout the previous chapters of the book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Åström KJ, Hägglund T (2006) Advanced PID control. ISA, Research Triangle Park
Åström KJ, Wittenmark P (1995) Adaptive control. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Åström KJ, Wittenmark P (1997) Computer controlled systems: theory and design. Prentice Hall, New York
Camacho EF, Bordons C (1999) Model predictive control. Springer, Berlin
Farenzena M, Trierweiler JO (2006) Variability matrix: a new tool to improve the plant performance. In: Proc IFAC ADCHEM, Gramado, Brazil, pp 893–898
Glattfelder AH, Schaufelberger W (2003) Control systems with input and output constraints. Springer, Berlin
Goodwin GC, Graebe SF, Salgado ME (2001) Control system design. Prentice Hall, New York
Hugo AJ (1999) Process controller performance monitoring and assessment. www.controlartsinc.com/Support/Articles/PerformanceAssessment.PDF
Isermann R, Lachman KH, Matko D (1992) Adaptive control systems. Prentice Hall, New York
Kozub DJ (1996) Controller performance monitoring and diagnosis: experiences and challenges. In: Proc chemical process control confer, Lake Tahoe, USA, pp 83–96
Lunze J (2008) Regelungstechnik 2: Mehrgrößensysteme, Digitale Regelung. Springer, Berlin
Maciejowski JM (2001) Predictive control with constraints. Prentice Hall, New York
Morari M, Zafiriou E (1989) Robust process control. Prentice Hall, New York
Ogawa S (1998) A data analysis and graphical representation system for control loop performance assessment. In: Proc TAPPI process control confer, Vancouver, Canada
Rugh WJ (1991) Analytical framework for gain scheduling. IEEE Control Syst Mag 11:79–84
Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA (2004) Process dynamics and control. Wiley, New York
Shinskey FG (1996) Process-control systems: application, design, and tuning. McGraw Hill, New York
Smith OJM (1957) Closed control of loops with dead time. Chem Eng Prog 53:217–219
Skogestad S, Postlethwaite I (1996) Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design. Wiley, New York
Stanfelj N, Marlin TE, MacGregor JF (1993) Monitoring and diagnosis of process control performance: the single-loop case. Ind Eng Chem Res 67:856–861
Vatanski N, Jämsä-Jounela S-L, Rantala A, Harju T (2005) Control loop performance measures in the evaluation of process economics. In: Proc IFCA world congress, Prague
Visioli A (2006) Practical PID control. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jelali, M. (2013). Performance Monitoring and Improvement Strategies. In: Control Performance Management in Industrial Automation. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4546-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4546-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4545-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4546-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)