Skip to main content

Abstract

The Diabetes Telemedicine Clinic at the Cleveland VHA facility provides real-time specialty consultation and continuing education for patients with diabetes mellitus and their healthcare providers in community clinics known as community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs). Specifically, a patient at a CBOC is able to use a locally based videoconferencing system to have a virtual visit with an endocrinologist located at the Cleveland VHA’s main campus (VAMC). Figure 11.1 compares the usual face to face referral process with the new referral process, which uses a telehealth system to enable a virtual consult with a specialist. In the usual process, a decision is made by the primary care provider in the community clinic that referral for a diabetes consultation is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pogach L, Aron D. Quality of diabetes care (current levels, distribution, and trends) and challenges in measuring quality of care. In: Moran S, Gregg E, Williams D, Cowie C, Narayan K, editors. Diabetes and public health: from data to policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey J, Black M, Wilkin D. Specialist outreach clinics in general practice. Br Med J. 1994;308(6936):1083–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowling A, Stramer K, Dickinson E, Windsor J, Bond M. Evaluation of specialists’ outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialist, and general practitioners. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997;51(52):61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Powell J. Systematic review of outreach clinics in primary care in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(3):177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Black M, Leese B, Gosden T, Mead N. Specialist outreach clinics in general practice: what do they offer? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:558–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Black M, Gosden T, Leese B, Mead N. The costs and benefits of specialist outreach clinics in general practice in two specialties. Manchester, England: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byrne C, Mercincavage L, Pan E, Vincent A. The value from investments in health information technology at the U.S. department. Health Aff. 2010;29(4):629–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nazi K, Hogan T, Wagner T, McInnes D, Smith B, et al. Embracing a health services research perspective on personal health records: lessons learned from the VA My HealtheVet system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;25 Suppl 1:S62–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, Foster L, Edmonson E, et al. Care coordination/home telehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed e-Health. 2008;14(10):1118–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hill RD, Luptak MK, Rupper RW. Review of veterans health administration telemedicine interventions. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(12 Suppl HIT):e302–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kern E, Beischel S, Stanlnaker R, Aron D, et al. Building a diabetes registry from the Veterans Health Administration’s computerized patient record system. Diabetes Sci Tech. 2008;2:7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Batalden P, Nelson E, Edwards W, Godfrey M, Mohr J. Microsystems in health care: part 9. Developing small clinical units to attain peak performance. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2003;29(11):575–85.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson E, Batalden P, Huber T, et al. Microsystems in health care: Part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. J Qual Improv J Comm. 2002;28(9):472–93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Verhoeven F, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Eysenbach G, Gemert-Pijnen L. Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(3):666–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinstock RS, Teresi JA, Goland R, et al. Glycemic control and health disparities in older ethnically diverse underserved adults with diabetes: five-year results from the informatics for diabetes education and telemedicine (IDEATel) study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):274–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chumbler N, Vogel W, Garel M, Qin H, Kobb R, Ryan P. Health services utilization of a care coordination/ home-telehealth program for veterans with diabetes. J Ambul Care Manage. 2005;28(3):230–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopp F, Hogan M, Woodbridge P, Lowery J. The use of telehealth for diabetes management: a qualitative study of telehealth provider perceptions. Implement Sci. 2007;2:14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Watts SA, Lawrence RH, Kern E. Diabetes nurse case management training program: enhancing care consistent with the chronic care and patient-centered medical home models. Clin Diabetes. 2011;29(1):25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arora S, Geppert CMA, Kalishman S, et al. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: project ECHO. Acad Med. 2007;82(2):154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, et al. Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment—extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology. 2010;52(3):1124–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Susan R. Kirsh, MD, who has played a key role in the process of conceptualizing how specialist expertise can be integrated into primary care (Fig. 11.4).

Disclosures:This work was supported by VA HSR&D QUERI Program and VA HSR&D Grant IIR 03-254.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Sood M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or any other organization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sood, A. et al. (2013). TeleVisit Keeps IT Local. In: Berkowitz, L., McCarthy, C. (eds) Innovation with Information Technologies in Healthcare. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4327-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4327-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4326-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4327-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics