Abstract
Pulse-like (also known as resonant, cycloidal pulses, or impulse-like) ground motion has been observed in near-field (also near-fault or near-source) records with directivity focusing or fling effects. This class of ground motion is significantly influenced by the rupture mechanism, substantially different from ordinary ground motion records, and can be characterized by the following features [1–8, among others]: (1) long period and large amplitudes, (2) high peak ground velocity (PGV)/peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground displacement (PGD)/PGA ratios, (3) unusual response spectra shapes, and (4) concentration of energy in one or very few pulses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson J, Bertero V (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J Struct Eng 113(8):1709–1724
Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 24:815–828
Hall JH, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effect on flexible buildings. Earthquake Spectra 11:569–605
Heaton TH, Hall JH, Wald DJ, Halling MW (1995) Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings in a hypothetical MW 7·0 blind thrust earthquake. Science 267:206–211
Housner GW, Hudson DE (1958) The Port Hueneme earthquake of March 18, 1957. Bull Seismol Soc Am 48(2):163–168
Housner GW, Trifunac MD (1967) Analysis of accelerograms-Parkfield earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 57(6):1193–1220
Makris N (1997) Rigidity-plasticity-viscosity: Can electrorheological dampers protect base-isolated structures from near-source ground motions? Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 26:571–591
Zhang J, Makris N (2001) Rocking of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech 127(5):473–483
Hough SE, Bilham RG (2006) After the earthquakes: elastic rebound on an urban planet. Oxford University Press, NY
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2005) http://peer.berkeley.edu
Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity: seismic design of nuclear power plants. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 438–468
Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(3):581–626
Vanmarcke EH (1972) Properties of spectral moments with applications to random processes. J Eng Mech 42:215–220
Vanmarcke EH (1976) Structural response to earthquakes. In: Lomnitz C, Rosenbluth E (eds) Seismic risk and engineering decisions. Elsevier, NY
Housner GW (1970) Strong ground motion. In: Wiegel RL (ed) Earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, NJ
Housner GW, Jennings PC (1977) The capacity of extreme earthquake motions to damage structures. In: Hall WJ (ed) Structural and geotechnical mechanics: A volume honoring N. M. Newmark. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ, pp 102–116
Takewaki I (2004) Bound of earthquake input energy. J Struct Eng 130:1289–1297
Takewaki I (2006) Probabilistic critical excitation method for earthquake energy input rate. J Eng Mech 132(9):990–1000
Yamamoto K, Fujita K, Takewaki I (2011) Instantaneous earthquake input energy and sensitivity in base-isolated building. J Struct Des Tall Spec Buildings 20(6):631–648
Abbas AM (2006) Critical seismic load inputs for simple inelastic structures. J Sound Vib 296:949–967
Akiyama H (1985) Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo
Chai YH, Fajfar P (2000) A procedure for estimating input energy spectra for seismic design. J Earthquake Eng 4(4):39–561
Moustafa A (2009) Critical earthquake load inputs for multi-degree-of-freedom inelastic structures. J Sound Vib 325(3):532–544
Uang C-M, Bertero VV (1990) Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 19:77–90
Zahrah TF, Hall WJ (1984) Earthquake energy absorption in sdof structures. J Struct Eng 110:1757–1772
Cosenza C, Manfredi G, Ramasco R (1993) The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: a comparison between different methods. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 22:855–868
Ghobara A, Abou-Elfath H, Biddah A (1999) Response-based damage assessment of structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 28:79–104
Powell GH, Allahabadi R (1988) Seismic damage predictions by deterministic methods: concepts and procedures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 16:719–734
Park YJ, Ang AH-S, Wen YK (1985) Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. J Struct Eng 111(4):740–757
Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2002) Investigations into critical earthquake excitations within deterministic and probabilistic frameworks. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 31:813–832
Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2007) Reliability-based vector nonstationary random critical earthquake excitations for parametrically excited systems. Struct Saf 29:32–48
Takewaki I (2002) Seismic critical excitation method for robust design: a review. J Struct Eng 128:665–672
Takewaki I (2007) Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam
He WL, Agrawal AK (2008) Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems. J Struct Eng 134(7):1177–1188
Tan P, Agrawal AK, Pan Y (2005) Near-field effects on seismically excited highway bridge equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers. Bridge Struct 1(3):307–318
Moustafa A (2010) Discussion of analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems. J Struct Eng 136(2):229–230
Shinozuka M (1970) Maximum structural response to seismic excitations. J Eng Mech 96:729–738
Takewaki I (2001) Probabilistic critical excitation for MDOF elastic-plastic structures on compliant ground. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 30:1345–1360
Trifunac MD (2005) Power design method. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering in the 21st century to mark 40th anniversary of IZIIS-Skopje, key note lecture, 28 Aug–1 Sept 2005, Skopje and Ohrid, Macedonia
Trifunac MD (2008) Energy of strong motion at earthquake source. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 28:1–6
Arora JS (2004) Introduction to optimum design. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego
Caleman T, Branch MA, Grace A (1999) Optimization toolbox for the use with Matlab, user’s guide. The Math Works Inc., USA
Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2010) Deterministic and probabilistic representation of near-field pulse-like ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 30(5):412–422
Fujita K, Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2010) Optimal placement of viscoelastic dampers and supporting members under variable critical excitations. Earthquakes Struct 1(1):43–67
Takewaki I (2009) Building control with passive dampers: optimal performance-based design for earthquakes. Wiley, Singapore
Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2010) Critical characterization and modeling of pulse-like near-fault strong ground motion. Struct Eng Mech 34(6):755–778
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takewaki, I., Moustafa, A., Fujita, K. (2013). Critical Characterization and Modeling of Pulse-Like Near-Field Strong Ground Motion. In: Improving the Earthquake Resilience of Buildings. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4144-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4144-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4143-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4144-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)