Skip to main content

Coordinative Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coordinative Practices in the Building Process

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

One of the major research issues in CSCW is the understanding of how cooperative work is coordinated. This issue has often been cast as a question of exploring how articulation work is practiced and supported by way of artifacts. In the words of Strauss, articulation work is a kind of supra-type work in any division of labour, done by the various actors concerning the meshing and integration of interdependent cooperative work tasks (Strauss 1985, p.8). A series of focused, in-depth field studies have been undertaken with the specific purpose of investigating how the distributed activities of cooperative work arrangements are articulated and, in particular, how prescribed artifacts are devised, appropriated and used for these purposes (e.g. Carstensen and Sørensen 1996; Schmidt and Bannon 1992). In this chapter we will first follow in the footsteps of these studies and consider articulation work in the building process, i.e. in meetings, articulation work with coordinative artifacts such as Gantt charts, a file sharing system, and title blocks. Subsequently, within the context of design as well as construction we will consider a phenomenon that contributes to the integration of cooperative work, but perhaps cannot tenably be described as articulation work: We will consider how cooperative work task may be integrated by virtue of individuals acting on the material evidence of work previously accomplished by others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By way of clarification, the subject of this particular stipulation of tasks is the construction of non-load bearing partition walls such as those found separating the interior of the building into office space. Such walls may be constructed by suspending plasterboards on steel frames or studs. The initial erection of the steel framing is undertaken by carpenters, what on the Gantt chart is referred to as ‘walls – first side’. Following this the carpenters, electricians and plumbers undertake electrical cabling and plumbing pipe work respectively within the frame of the wall, these tasks are referred to as ‘cabling: electricity/sanitation/ventilation’ on the Gantt chart. In turn, the carpenters are designated to clad the steel frame in plasterboards and put up skirting boards, this is what is referred to as ‘closing of walls’ on the chart. Then follows the painters and their ‘finish/painting’ task also referred to on the chart. In this manner the construction of a partition wall involves several trades performing their crafts in an alternating sequence that is partly (and only partly) stipulated and represented on the Gantt Charts.

  2. 2.

    The verb to ‘police’ fittingly has its origin in late fifteenth century in the sense of ‘public order’. It is from medieval Latin (Oxford American Dictionary).

  3. 3.

    The actors themselves call them ‘progress meetings’.

  4. 4.

    See also Schmidt and Wagner (2004).

  5. 5.

    As a point of interest for the more technically inclined we could mention that in some projects (although not in all projects) model servers form the basis for cooperation in the design process in the sense that a model server acts as a shared container for the building model entities (on par with a project repository acting as a shared file container). Model serves are special databases dedicated to the handling of CAD models by which multiple users share their respective contributions. Users may be granted access rights to a model server and can then, as a basic functionality, upload models to a server and download models from a server. A special functionality of model servers is the check-out and check-in operations. Partial models can be checked out for external update and later checked in again. At check-out a special locking mechanism marks the checked out objects in the model server. Other users may still read these objects but only the user that performed the check-out, or the users administrator are allowed to make changes. Normally, the checked out model or partial model is modified by a modeling tool and then re-entered by check-in. During check-in, a merge operation is carried out. During this, re-entered objects will replace the excising objects, new objects will be added and missing objects will be removed automatically by the model server. A successful check-in will release all locks, created at check-out (Jørgensen et al. 2008, p.18).

  6. 6.

    Historically speaking, originally layers were pieces of paper with drawings of different building elements that could be placed on top of each other and looked through for inspection and alignment. Today the basis of this concept or idea persists in three-dimensional CAD designs, albeit in a somewhat different form. Today the term ‘layer’ in three-dimensional design refers to the divisions whereby a design may be broken into discrete and semi-autonomous entities each hosting specialised submodels.

References

  • Anderson, R.J., J.A. Hughes, W.W. Sharrock. 1989. Working for Profit: The Social Organisation of Calculation in an Entrepreneurial Firm. Avebury, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, E. 1965. The concept of organisation. Social Research 32 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, P., C. Sørensen. 1996. From the Social to the Systematic: Mechanisms supporting coordination in design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. The Journal of Collaborative Computing 5(4) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. 1956. Some sociological concepts and methods for psychiatrists. Psychiatric Paper 6 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R.R., J.A. Hughes, D.Z. Shapiro. 1989. The Functionality of Flight Strips in ATC Work. The report for the Civil Aviation Authority. Lancaster Sociotechnics Group, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, K.A., J. Skauge, P. Christiansson, K. Svidt, K.B. Sørensen, J. Mitchell. 2008. Use of IFC Model Servers: Modelling Collaboration Possibilities in Practice. Aalborg University, Aalborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. 1994. Modes and Mechanisms of Interaction in Cooperative Work. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., L. Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal. 1(1–2) 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., C. Simone. 1996. Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 5(2–3) 155–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., I. Wagner. 2004. Ordering systems: Coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing 13(5–6) 349–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1962. The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106(6) 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P.A., R.K. Merton. 1937. Social time: a methodological and functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology(42) 615–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. 1989. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. L. Gasser, M. Huhns, eds. Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Pitman, London, 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L., J.R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. 1985. Work and the division of labor. The Sociological Quarterly 26(1) 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tory, M., S. Staub-French, B.A. Po, F. Wu. 2008. Physical and Digital Artifact-Mediated Coordination in Building Design Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) An International Journal 17(4) 311–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christensen, L.R. (2013). Coordinative Practices. In: Coordinative Practices in the Building Process. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4117-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4117-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4116-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4117-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics