Skip to main content

Serious Learning in Serious Games

Learning In, Through, and Beyond Serious Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Serious Games are promising tools for fostering learning and for transforming players’ behavior and perspectives on particular topics. But can serious games satisfy these high expectations on an educational, learning theoretical, and empirical level? This chapter investigates different learning levels in serious games and follows the question, how serious learning in serious games proceeds. Based on Gregory Bateson’s concept of learning, three essential learning processes in games are compared and examples of serious games are analyzed critically. The main focus hereby lies on transformative, deep and meaningful learning processes that have a serious impact on players’ perspectives. Furthermore the educational concept of transformative learning is applied to the field of serious games, and their potential and limits for game design and education are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.seriousgames.org/

  2. 2.

    He distinguishes between zero-, proto- and deutero-learning (Bateson, 1972, pp. 248–287).

  3. 3.

    http://www.globalconflicts.eu

  4. 4.

    http://www.globalconflicts.eu

  5. 5.

    Like professional educators and teachers designers of serious game designer should openly discuss their understanding of learning, the goals of their game design, and the instructional methods in use. So far only a few serious games offer a deeper insight in what their educational approach is.

  6. 6.

    Although the transformational potential of Global Conflicts: Sweatshop appears limited, as the game focuses more on teaching debating skills and delivering information than on connecting to the players perspectives, more empirical data on players’ serious learning processes is needed. It should be mentioned that the game is intended to be supported by educators, who can download teaching materials for their pupils (cf. http://www.globalconflicts.eu).

References

  • Abt, C.A.: Serious Games. Viking, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.: Theory in Practice. Increasing Professional Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., Gresalfi, M.S., Ingram-Goble, A.: Transformational Play: Using Games to Position Person, Content, and Context. Educ. Res. 39(7), 525–536 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S.M., Ceci, S.J.: When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychol. Bull. 128(4), 612–637 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G.: Steps to An Ecology of Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J.G.: Dancing on the threshold of meaning: Recognizing and understanding the growing edge. J. Transformative Educ. 2(4), 336–351 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co Inc, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, G.: Lernen und Erfahrung – Epagogik. Zum Begriff der didaktischen Induktion. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E.: Learning from serious games? Arguments, evidence, and research suggestions. Educ. Technol. 7, 56–59 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J.H., Tosca, S.: Thoughts on learning in games and designing educational computer games. http://game-research.com/index.php/articles/thoughts-on-learning-in-games-and-designing-educational-computer-games (2006). Accessed 01 June 2011

  • Fröbel, F.: Die Menschenerziehung, die Erziehungs-, Unterrichts- und Lehrkunst, angestrebt in der allgemeinen deutschen Erziehungsanstalt zu Keilhau. Verlag Erziehungsanstalt zu Keilhau, Keilhau (1826)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R.M.: Instructional Technologies: Foundations. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P.: What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave/Macmillan, New York (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P.: Learning and games. In: Salen, K. (ed.) The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, pp. 21–40. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P., Hayes, E.R.: Women and Gaming: The Sims and 21st Century Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, P.M., Cole, S.W., Bradlyn A.S., Pollock B.H.: A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 122(2), e305–e317 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimmt, C.: Serious games and social change. Why they (should) work. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games. Mechanism and Effects, pp. 248–270. Routledge, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovan, J., Dirkx, J.M.: “Being called awake”: The role of transformative learning in the lives of environmental activists. Adult Educ. Q. 53(2), 99–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. William Tegg, London (1689)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E., Wittrock, M.C.: Problem-solving transfer. In: Berliner, D.C., Calfee, R.C. (eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 47–62. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J.: Reality is Broken. Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. The Penguin Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J.: Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Educ. Q. 46(3), 158–172 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J.: How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In: Jarvis, P. (ed.) Adult and Continuing Education: Teaching, Learning and Research, pp. 199–214. Taylor & Francis, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J.: An overview of transformative learning. In: Illeris, K. (ed.) Contemporary Theories of Learning, pp. 90–105. Routledge, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A., Savill-Smith, C.: The use of computer and video games for learning. http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1529.pdf (2004). Accessed 01 June 2011

  • Mitgutsch, K.: Lernen durch Enttäuschung. Eine pädagogische Skizze. Braumüller Verlag, Vienna (eng.: Learning through resistant experiences) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitgutsch, K.: Playful learning experiences. Meaningful learning patterns in players’ biographies. Int. J. Games Comput. Mediated Simulat. 3(3), 54–68 (2011a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitgutsch, K.: Learning through play – a delicate matter. Experience-based recursive learning in computer games. In: Fromme, J., Unger, A. (eds.) Computer Games and New Media Cultures: A Handbook of Digital Games Studies. (2011b, in print)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M.: Il Metodo della Pedagogia Scientifica Applicato all’Educatione Infantile nelle Casa dei Bambini. Città di Castello, Perugia (1909)

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, D., Gowin, D.B.: Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H.F., Wainess, R., Baker, E.L.: Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature.  Curriculum J.16(4), 455–474 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, E., Morrell, A., O’Connor, M.A. (eds.): Expanding the Boundaries of Transformative Learning. Palgrave, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parchman, S.W., Ellis, J.A., Christinaz, D., Vogel, M.: An evaluation of three computerbased instructional strategies in basic electricity and electronics training. Mil. Psychol. 12(1), 73–87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I.P.: Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes. International Publishers, New York (1928)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, W., Lee, M., Heeter, C.: The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. J. Commun. 60(4), 723–742 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: Der Aufbau der Wirklichkeit beim Kinde. Klett, Stuttgart (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.): Serious Games. Mechanism and Effects. Routledge, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J.: Émile. Dent, London (1762)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K.: Gaming literacies: A game design study in action. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 16(3), 301–322 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D.L., Blair, K.P., Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Davis, J.: Animations of thought: Interactivity in the teachable agent paradigm. In: Lowe, R., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation: Research and Implications for Design, pp. 114–140. University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D.: How Computer Games Help Children Learn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D., Squire, K.D., Halverson, R., Gee, J.P.: Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan 87(2), 104–111 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F.: About Behaviourism. Alfred Knopf, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K.D.: From content to context: Video games as designed experiences. Educ. Res. 35(8), 19–29 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C.: Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. eLearning 4(3), 297–318 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B.: The Grasshopper. Game, Life and Utopia. Broadview Press, Ontario (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, R., Haritatos, J., Cole, S.: HopeLab’s approach to re-mission. Int. J. Learn. Media 1(1), 29–35 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L.: The Fundamentals of Learning. Teachers College Press, New York (1932)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tkacz, S.: Learning map interpretation: Skill acquisition and underlying abilities. J. Environ. Psychol. 18(3), 237–249 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M.J.P., Perron, B. (eds.): The Video Game Theory Reader. Routledge, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.: Reducing unproductive learning activities in serious games for second language acquisition. Dissertation. University of Southern California (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Games

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantin Mitgutsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitgutsch, K. (2011). Serious Learning in Serious Games. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L. (eds) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2160-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2161-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics