Skip to main content

A Framework for Thinking about Oppression and Its Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS,volume 11))

  • 2041 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a framework for thinking about oppression and how to overcome it. It considers the value premise underlying the use of the term “oppression.” It then discusses the nature of oppression, the forms it takes, and what keeps it in place. In its final two sections, it focuses on awakening the sense of injustice and the strategies and tactics for overcoming injustice.

Deutsch, M. (2006). A framework for thinking about oppression and its change. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 7–41.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Also, it should be noted that the social science literature on “quality-of-life” and “subjective well-being” indicates that there is a low contribution beyond the poverty level in advanced economies, of greater income to subjective well-being (Kahneman, Diener, & Schwarz, 1999; Lane, 2000). The oppressors’ drive for superior wealth, accompanied by conspicuous consumption, often impairs social relations, a key component of subjective well-being.

References

  • Alinsky, S. D. (1971). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. L., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Judd, C. M. (2000). In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1990). Forms of social organization: Psychological consequences. In H. T. Himmelweit & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Societal psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Coleman, P. T. (2000). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Collins, M. E. (1951). Interracial housing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Steil, J. M. (1988). Awakening the sense of injustice. Social Justice Research, 2, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, P. (1971). Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and acquiescence. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. American Psychologist, 16, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1964). Foreign policy position as a function of social position. Journal of Peace Research, 1, 206–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D. G. (1998). Confronting injustice and oppression. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (1999). Civilized oppression. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., Bonata, B., and others. (2005). Encyclopedia of selected peaceful societies. On website http://www.peacefulsocieties.org

  • Himmelstrand, V. (1969). Tribalism, nationalism, rank-equilibration, and social structures. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. L. (Ed.). (1990). Nonviolence in theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S., & Willis, R. (Eds.). (1989). Societies at peace: Anthropological perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-beings: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G., & Fry, D. P. (Eds.). (2004). Keeping the peace: Conflict resolution and peaceful societies around the world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (2000). Loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, P. (1990). Community and confluence. Cleveland, OH: Gestalt Institute of Cleveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1994). A long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1995). A long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Little, Brown. Paperback edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (Ed.). (1937). Cooperation and competition among primitive peoples. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckerman, K. M. (Ed.). (2004). Social inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, L. (1994). Intolerance: A general survey. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1987). Limits of fairness: An experimental examination of antecedents of the scope of justice. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International, Dissertation Information Service. Order #8724072. [Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(08B), 2500.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1990). Deterring moral exclusion: A summary. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1995). Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. In B. B. Binker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 347–369). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1996a). Is justice finite? The case of environmental inclusion. In L. Montada & M. Lerner (Eds.), Social justice in human relations: Current societal concerns about justice (Vol. 3, pp. 213–230). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1996b). Affirmative action, fairness, and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (2001). Social injustice. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 102–109). New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, R., & Wysong, E. (1999). The new class society. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. (1967). Social evaluation theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, T. S., Vogele, W. B., Krueglar, C., & McCarthy, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Protest, power and change: An encyclopedia of nonviolent action from Act-up to women’s suffrage. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. C. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J. K., & Levine, K. (2004). U. S. black-white inequality. In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (1971). The politics of nonviolent action: An encyclopedia of thought and action. Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de. (1947). L’ancien regime (M. W. Patterson, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckman, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morton Deutsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deutsch, M. (2011). A Framework for Thinking about Oppression and Its Change. In: Coleman, P. (eds) Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics