Skip to main content

Current and Cutting Edge Methods of Portfolio Decision Analysis in Pharmaceutical R&D

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Portfolio Decision Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 162))

Abstract

The R&D, regulatory, and marketing process in the pharmaceutical industry have distinct differences in timing, risk, opportunity, compliance, and cost structure compared to most other industries, making portions of portfolio decision analysis (PDA) significantly different. We will cover these differences and how PDA methods need to adapt to be most useful. We will address concepts of project valuation, portfolio prioritization, portfolio uncertainty, portfolio balance, and portfolio optimization. One goal of this chapter is to introduce the readers to concepts and methods which may not be used or even considered in their organizations, as well as to put the methods currently being used into context. We will present a methodology growing in popularity within PDA of discovery and early development portfolios– multiple objective decision analysis (MODA). A major theme throughout this chapter is a focus on portfolio objectives, rather than project goals, values, and risks. So many companies still focus their analytical efforts on project level valuation and prioritization, missing chances to help the organization meet portfolio level goals, fill company levels gaps, and help leaders conduct portfolio level risk management. We explore the idea that subportfolios exist, and different PDA methods may be more successfully implemented in one subportfolio than others. Finally, maximizing value, managing risk, and aligning decision making with company values requires an integrated portfolio management process, which we address at the end of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Drugs in Development: From Pipeline to Market 2010 PharmaLive, July 2010.

  2. 2.

    K.S. Holland and B. Bátiz-Lazo, 2004 Case Study.

References

  • Belton V, Stewart T (2001) Multiple criteria decision analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Buede D, Maxwell D (1995) Rank disagreement: a comparison of multi-criteria methodologies. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 4(1–2):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelk B, Kloeber J, Jackson J, Parnell G, Deckro R (1998) Making the CERCLA criteria analysis of remedial alternatives more objective. Remediation 8(2):87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard R (1988) Decision analysis: practice and promise. Manage Sci 34(6):679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R (1992) Value focused thinking: a path to creative decision-making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa, H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives, Cambridge books. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keisler J (2004) Value of information in portfolio decision analysis. Decis Anal 1(3):177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keisler J (2011) Portfolio decision quality. In: Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A (eds) Portfolio decision analysis: improved methods for resource allocation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson D, Matheson JE (1998) The smart organization. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee P, Celona J (1990) Decision Analysis with Supertree, Second edition. South San Francisco, California: The Scientific Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell GS, Bennett GE, Engelbrecht JA, Szafranski R (2002) Improving resource allocation within the national reconnaissance office. Interfaces 32(3):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A (2011) An invitation to portfolio decision analysis. In: Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A (eds) Portfolio decision analysis: improved methods for resource allocation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe P, Keelin T (1998) How SmithKline Beecham Makes Better Resource-Allocation Decisions, Harvard Business Review, March-April

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilker B (2009) Guide to drug development: a comprehensive review and assessment. Lippicott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin T, Kutolksi D (1999) Action-oriented portfolio Management. Res Technol Manage 42(2):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress (2005) Congressional Base Realignment and Closure Act

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2008) Bioterrorism risk assessment: a call for change, committee on methodological improvements to the Department of Homeland Security’s Biological Agent Risk Analysis. National Research Council National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Kloeber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kloeber, J. (2011). Current and Cutting Edge Methods of Portfolio Decision Analysis in Pharmaceutical R&D. In: Salo, A., Keisler, J., Morton, A. (eds) Portfolio Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 162. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9943-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics