Abstract
Compliance archeology is not an old way of doing things, but you might not know it from the frequency with which tradition is invoked in the design and implementation of archeological projects. This chapter describes the system of cultural resource management (CRM) in the USA, how and why understandings and implementations of the Section 106 process within the National Historic Preservation Act often coalesce around standard pro-forma minimalist approaches that are explained, if explanation is required, by the of-heard phrase “we always”, and why such approaches are in fact not what is specified under the law but does a disservice to clients, archeologists, the cultural resources themselves, and the many publics and populations with interests in those cultural resources. Alternative, creative, and much more satisfying approaches to project design, research, and implementation are then developed with extended case examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This like many parts of the fictionalized scenario, is based on actual cases. This inscription appears on an obelisk honoring the descendant families of Ft. Polk in Louisiana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sebastian, L. (2011). Secrets of the Past, Archaeology, and the Public. In: Rockman, M., Flatman, J. (eds) Archaeology in Society. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9881-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9881-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9880-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9881-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)