Abstract
Feminist scholars have produced a large literature problematizing the unitary categories “woman” and “feminism” (e.g., Burman, 1998; Capdevila, Ciclitira, Lazard, & Marzano, 2006; Fraser & Nicholson, 1990; hooks, 1981; Mohanty, 1988; Riley, 1988). Many of these critiques highlight the fluidity, situatedness, locality, contingency, and intersectionality that are required to theorize and understand women’s experiences, especially in a postcolonial, transnational, context. Given this rich literature, to what extent are scholars working under the broad umbrella of feminist psychology aware of and informed by developments outside their own local (national, regional) contexts? Such an awareness has the potential to combat the myth of universalism characteristic of much of psychology (at least in some parts of the world), overcome intellectual isolationism, increase international communication, forge transnational linkages, and at the very least enrich our understanding of the challenges and exhilarations of the feminist process as it is being enacted all over the world.
Building global feminisms and transnational linkages is a complex process when there is no one “local”, “national”, or “global” woman, nor any single universal “feminist” approach.
(Flew et al., 1999, p. 402)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bhaba, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
Bhatia, S. (2008). Rethinking culture and identity in psychology: Towards a transnational cultural psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 28(1), 301–321.
Brock, A. C. (Ed.). (2006). Internationalizing the history of psychology. New York: New York University Press.
Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology. London: Sage.
Capdevila, R., Ciclitira, K., Lazard, L., & Marzano, L. (2006). If I am woman, who are ‘they’? The construction of ‘other’ feminisms. Psychology of Women Section Review, 8(2), 23–30.
Crawford, M. (1998). The reciprocity of psychology and popular culture. In E. Burman (Ed.), Deconstructing feminist psychology (pp. 61–89). London: Sage.
Flew, F., Bagilhole, B., Carabine, J., Fenton, N., Kitzinger, C., Lister, R., et al. (1999). Introduction: Local feminisms, global futures. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(4), 393–403.
Fraser, N., & Nicholson, L. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/ postmodernism (pp. 19–38). London: Routledge.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111–1120.
hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman? Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press.
Kitzinger, C. (1991). Politicizing psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 1, 49–54. doi:10.1177/ 0959353591011005.
Marecek, J. (1995). Psychology and feminism: Can this relationship be saved? In D. C. Stanton & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Feminisms in the academy (pp. 101–132). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Misra, G. (2006). Psychology and societal development: Paradigmatic and social concerns. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.
Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 61–88.
Mojab, S. (2001). Theorizing the politics of ‘Islamic feminism’. Feminist Review, 69, 124–146.
Morawski, J. G. (1990). Toward the unimagined: Feminism and epistemology in psychology. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 150–183). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Ostertag, P. A., & McNamara, J. R. (1991). “Feminization” of psychology: The changing sex ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 349–359.
Raj, K. (2007). Relocating modern science: Circulation and the construction of knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650–1900. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Riley, D. (1988). Am I that name? Feminism and the category of ‘women’ in history. New York: MacMillan.
Squire, C. (1989). Significant differences: Feminism in psychology. London: Routledge.
Ussher, J. M. (Ed.). (2000). Women’s health: Contemporary international perspectives. New York: Wiley.
Wilkinson, S. (1991). Why psychology (badly) needs feminism. In J. Aaron & S. Walby (Eds.), Out of the margins: Women’s studies in the nineties (pp. 191–203). London and New York: The Falmer Press.
Wilkinson, S. (1996). Feminist social psychologies: International perspectives. Buckingham, Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Young, L. (2000). What is black British feminism? Women: A Cultural Review, 11(1/2), 45–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rutherford, A., Capdevila, R., Undurti, V., Palmary, I. (2011). Feminisms and Psychologies: Multiple Meanings, Diverse Practices, and Forging Possibilities in an Age of Globalization. In: Rutherford, A., Capdevila, R., Undurti, V., Palmary, I. (eds) Handbook of International Feminisms. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9869-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9869-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9868-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9869-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)