Skip to main content

Self Psychology and the Human–Animal Bond: An Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the psychological nature of the human–animal bond, using a theory called self psychology. In self psychology, animals who serve an essential function in maintaining a person’s cohesion and psychological well-being are said to be serving a selfobject function. Companion animals can provide any of the three selfobject functions—mirroring, idealizing, and twinship. This chapter gives examples of these three types of selfobject functions and explores special qualities of animals that may enable them to fulfill these crucial functions for people. The chapter’s selfobject questionnaire is designed to help reveal what type(s) of selfobject relationship(s) each animal provides. The difference between a mature and an archaic selfobject relationship is also explored with the example of the animal hoarder.

This work was funded in part by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Health and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions under Tuskegee University’s Center of Excellence Grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alper, L. S. (1993). The child-pet bond. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), The widening scope of self psychology: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 257–270). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A., & Killeen, C. (2009). Inside animal hoarding: The case of Barbara Erickson and her 552 dogs. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banai, E., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2005). Self-object needs in Kohut’s self psychology: Links with attachment, self-cohesion, affect regulation and adjustment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22(2), 224–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. E. (2007). Companion animals as self-objects. Anthrozoos, 20(4), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. E. (2011). Theoretical concepts from self psychology applied to animal hoarding. Society & Animals, 19(2), 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagman, G. (1997). Mature self-object experience. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Progress in self psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 85–107). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. A. (2000). Psychosocial benefits of animal companionship. In A. H. Aubrey Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal assisted therapy: Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice (pp. 39–78). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, M., & Walter, H. (2009). Konnen (Heim) Tiere die Funktion eines Selbstobjekts ubernehmen? Self psychology: European journal for psychoanalytical therapy and research, 38, 365–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium (2002). Health implications of animal hoarding. Health & Social Work, 27(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patronek, G. I. (1999). Hoarding of animals: An under-recognized public health problem in a difficult-to-study population. Public Health Reports, 114, 81–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patronek, G. J., Loar, L., & Nathanson, J. N. (2006). Animal hoarding: Strategies for interdisciplinary interventions to help people, animals, and communities at risk. Boston: Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium. Available at: http://www.tufts.edu/vet/cfa/hoarding/pubs/AngellReport.pdf. Accessed Sept 16, 2009.

  • Patronek, G. I., & Nathanson, J. N. (2009). A theoretical perspective to inform assessment and treatment strategies for animal hoarders. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 274–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (2003). Advances in neuropsychoanalysis, attachment theory, and trauma research: Implications for self psychology. In A. N. Schore (Ed.), Affect regulation and the repair of the self (pp. 108–148). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. L. (1999). Self psychology and diagnostic assessment: Identifying self-object functions through psychological testing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonnesvang, J. (2002). Self-object and self-subject relationships. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Postmodern self psychology: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 149–166). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. S. (1988). Treating the self: Elements of clinical self psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue-Ellen Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Companion Animal Selfobject Questionnaire

Appendix: Companion Animal Selfobject Questionnaire

Select one specific animal to answer the questions. You may select animals that are alive or deceased. If you have more than one animal, complete the quiz separately for each one.

Part I: Is your animal a selfobject?

(1)

Would you feel devastated if you lost your animal?

True False

(2)

Would you feel a sense of falling apart or have trouble functioning if you lost your animal?

True False

If your answers to both questions in Part I were true, then your animal is probably a selfobject to you. If so, continue to Part II. If you answered only one as true, continue on as they may still be a selfobject.

Part II: What type of selfobject is your animal?

Answer the following questions to find out what type of selfobject your animal may be. Circle T for True and F for False.

Mirroring Selfobject

True

False

(1)

Does your animal give you a feeling of being loved, special, treasured or important?

T

F

(2)

Would you say your animal calms, soothes, comforts or reassures you?

T

F

(3)

Does your animal make you feel loved and accepted in spite of any flaws or imperfections?

T

F

(4)

Does your animal make you feel vibrant, invigorated or energized?

T

F

(5)

Do you feel your animal sometimes shares in your emotional states, reflecting back to you your own happiness, sadness or other emotions?

T

F

Mirroring Selfobject Sub-Total ____

Idealized Selfobject

(6)

Do you feel stronger (psychologically or physically) when near your animal?

T

F

(7)

Do you feel proud when out in public with your animal (or showing photos of your animal) or when other people admire them?

T

F

(8)

Would you say your animal has abilities or qualities that you wish you had or you admire?

T

F

(9)

Do you admire your animal’s strength, power, confidence or assertiveness?

T

F

(10)

Do you perceive your animal as having a stable, calm, non-anxious, powerful, wise, or protective presence?

T

F

Idealized Selfobject Sub-Total ____

Twinship Selfobject

(11)

Would you say that you consider your animal to be a soul-mate or that you have a special kinship with him/her?

T

F

(12)

Do you sometimes feel a sense of being one with your animal?

T

F

(13)

Does it seem to you that you are similar to your animal in some meaningful and deep way(s)?

T

F

(14)

Do you feel an unspoken capacity to know and understand each other’s inner states?

T

F

(15)

Do you believe that you and your animal are often thinking the same thoughts or that you can read each other’s minds?

T

F

Twinship Selfobject Sub-Total ____

Add 1 point for each True item above. Add item points for each type of selfobject to obtain the 3 sub-totals. The highest sub-total number is an indication of which type of selfobject your animal is for you. It is also possible that your animal is more than one type of selfobject.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, SE. (2011). Self Psychology and the Human–Animal Bond: An Overview. In: Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., Shen-Miller, D. (eds) The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics