Skip to main content

GIS-Based ER-USLE Model to Predict Soil Loss in Cultivated Land

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Theory and Practice of Soil Loss Control in Eastern China

Abstract

In the Dabie Mountains of the lower Yangtze basin, China, soil loss reduction has been deemed as important as flood control after the 1998 flood, which caused great damage to the area and its residents. For soil loss control in the Dabie Mountains, China, the first step is the determination of appropriate strategies. An urgent need exists for soil loss models that can provide sufficient information for developing strategies to control soil loss using field observation data over several years. In this study, field observations of water and sediment discharges were carried out at the micro-plot scale and the USLE (universal soil loss equation)-plot scale in the Shangshe catchment of the Dabie Mountains in China. Through analyses of field observation data in the Shangshe catchment during the period 1999–2007, the USLE model was applied to predict both annual soil loss and that for single events based on GIS in a sub-catchment of cultivated land. Model calibration showed that by using an effective rain erosivity factor (R e) instead of R (rain erosivity) in the RUSLE, and by portraying the interaction among seasonal precipitation, seasonal crop coverage (C s), and practice of discrete-event practices by human beings (P s) in the USLE, an ER-USLE model was developed and model accuracy improved. With these measures, the ER-USLE model can be utilized to predict annual soil loss based on single events from field observation data over a few years. Comparison between predicted results and observed results of the field observation data of soil loss from 2000 to 2007 in the sub-catchment of cultivated land scale with USLE and ER-USLE models shows that the R 2 of ER-USLE (0.82) is much higher than that (0.46) of the USLE. With ER-USLE and GIS, strategies for soil loss control are possible based on seasonal soil loss information with field observation data over a few years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bu ZH, Zhao HF, Liu SQ (1993) Preliminary study on algorithm formula of vegetative factor for undisturbed areas in remote sensing monitoring soil loss. Remote Sensing Technol Appl 8:16–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson A, Collins R (1998) Predicting erosion and sediment yield at the catchment scale. Soil erosion at multiple scales. CAB International, Wallingford, 317–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine WD, Mahmoudzadeh A, Myers C (2002) Land use effects on sediment yields and soil loss rates in small basins of Triassic sandstone near Sydney, NSW, Australia. Catena 49:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ, Zhao WW, Chen LD, Zhang QJ, Lu YH, Gulinck H, Poesen J (2005) Assessment of soil erosion at large watershed scale using RUSLE and GIS: a case study in the loess plateau of China. Land Degrad Dev 16:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriels D, Ghekiere G, Schiettecatte W, Rottiers I (2003) Assessment of USLE cover-management C-factors for 40 rotation systems on arable farms in the Kemmelbeek watershed, Belgium. Soil Till Res 74:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin ML, Beasley DB, Fletcher JJ, Foster GR (1988) Estimating soil loss on topographically non-uniform field and farm units. J Soil Water Conserv 43:326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang ZS, Wang ZQ, Liu Z (1996) Quantitative study on spatial variation of soil erosion in a small watershed in the loess hilly region. J Soil Erosion Soil Conserv 2:1–9 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin ZQ, Shi PJ, Hou FC (1992) Systemic soil erosion model and controlling pattern. Ocean Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (1998) Converting USLE soil erodibilities for use with the QREI30 index. Soil Till Res 45:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (2004) Letter to the editor on “the mathematical integrity of some universal soil loss equation variants.” J Soil Sci Soc 68:336–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YB, Tang KL, Cha X (1990) Experiment on the soil and water loss of slope land with different ground cover. J Soil Water Conserv 4:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu ZF, Su M, Li GX (1988) Study on grass and bush and tillage measures to conserve soil and water in loess region. J Soil Water Conserv 2:37–48 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma ZZ (1989) Methods of estimating factors in universal soil loss equation with satellite image. Soil Water Conserv (Chin) 6:24–27 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Minami N, Yamada T, Nakano M, Tomisaka M, Tokunaga T, Yamashiro O (2002) The characteristics of red sediment discharge at different stages of cultivation of pineapple fields. J Jap Soc Eros Cont (Eng) 54:30–38 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch FJ (1986) Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the Universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neering MA (1998) Why soil erosion models over-predict small soil losses and under-predict large soil losses. Catena 32:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). In: Agriculture Handbook, vol 703. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanton JR, Osborn HB, Renard KG (1980) Application of the USLE to southwestern rangelands. Hydro Water Res Ariz SW 10:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Xiao J, Wang ZG (1998) A preliminary study on effects of straw mulches on surfaces flow and soil erosion on slope farmland. J Shanxi Agric Univ 18:149–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1972) Sediment-yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor. In: Present and prospective technology for prediction sediment yield and sources: proceedings of the sediment yield workshop. USDA Sedimentation Lab, Oxford, MS, ARS-S-40, pp 244–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1972) Sediment yield computed with Universal equation. J Hydrol Div ASCE 98:2087–2098

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1977) Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Trans ASAE vol 20(6):1100–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Renard KG, Dyke PT (1984) A new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. J Soil Water Conserv 38:381–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JP (1986) Estimating the topographic factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation for watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 41:179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1965) Predicting rainfall erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation planning. USDA Agriculture Handbook, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. A guide to conservation planning. In: Agricultural handbook, vol 537. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang KB, Guo PC (1994) Study of erosivity index of rainfall in Northern Shanxi hilly and gully area. Bull Soil Water Conserv 14:31–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JC, Hu HB (1996) Water and soil loss in China. Chinese Forestry Press, Peking (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JC, Ruan HH, Hu HB et al (1999) The present situation and control measures of soil and water loss in Changjiang River Valley. J Nanjing Forestry Univ 23(2):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yuan JP, Liu BY (2002) Advance in researches on vegetation cover and management factor in the soil erosion prediction model. Chin J Appl Ecol 13:1033–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JC, Zhaung JY, Nakamura H, Cheng P (2004) Suspended sediment discharges from various land uses in the Shangshe catchment in the Mountains, China. Ninth international symposium on river sedimentation, Yichang, China. Qinhua Univeristy Press, Beijing, pp 2426–2431

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was undertaken within the framework of a research project funded by the Forestry Department of Anhui Province, China. We appreciate the help of Luo Hongyan, Yangyan, Huang Xiaying, Hu Zhidong, Liu Caihong, Wu Zhongneng, Chu Chengdong, and Hu Bingqi for sediment/sample collection and processing. Collaboration of the Forestry Department of Yuexi prefecture in maintaining the monitoring stations at the Shangshe catchment is gratefully acknowledged. We wish to extend our thanks to Prof. Bernard of USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for his reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.C. Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, J., DeAngelis, D., Zhuang, J. (2011). GIS-Based ER-USLE Model to Predict Soil Loss in Cultivated Land. In: Theory and Practice of Soil Loss Control in Eastern China. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9679-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics