Skip to main content

An Institutional Approach to Peace and Prosperity: Toward a Korean Fisheries Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 669 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ((PEAP))

Abstract

The divided Koreas are considered an abnormal security hazard for Northeast Asia. They are still at war since the 1950–1953 conflict as the 1953 armistice was never followed by a peace treaty. At the same time, the Korean peninsula has a sensitive and geostrategic role in the region, surrounded by major powers pursuing their respective interests. In such a condition, the status quo has proven resilient for more than 45 years until the 1990s. Change occurred internally with the democratic transition and unification movement in the South and ongoing economic and political difficulties in the North and externally with the end of the Cold War and the euphoria over “the end of history.” These series of events encouraged social and political discussions over the possibility of Korean unification. In September 1991, both the Koreas simultaneously entered the United Nations. In December 1991, they signed “the Agreement on Reconciliation, Non-Aggression, and Exchanges, and Cooperation.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    President Roh Does Not Want the North to Collapse (2005).

  2. 2.

    Lee Myung-bak (2007); Mary Kissel (2009).

  3. 3.

    Brian J. Barna (1998); Philip Young P. Hong (2008); Hak-Joon Kim (1993); Young-Sun Lee (2001).

  4. 4.

    Hak-Joon Kim, ibid., 48.

  5. 5.

    According to Jonathan Pollack and Chung Min Lee, the gradual approach is heavily reliant on “assumptions of expectations that seem highly optimistic,” because no evidence suggests that Kim Jong-il is capable or inclined to carry out such sweeping reform, and even if he did, there is no guarantee of success. Jonathan D. Pollack and Chung Min Lee (1999).

  6. 6.

    John S. Park (2005).

  7. 7.

    Jae-woo Choo (2005).

  8. 8.

    Michael Schiffer (2009).

  9. 9.

    Karen S. Cook (2007).

  10. 10.

    Leigh Raymond (2006).

  11. 11.

    Toshio Yamagishi, Satoshi Kanazawa, Rie Mashima, and Shigeru Terai (2005).

  12. 12.

    Cook, Hardin and Levi, ibid.

  13. 13.

    Aaron Hoffman (2007).

  14. 14.

    Hoffman, ibid., 308.

  15. 15.

    Park, ibid.

  16. 16.

    Charles L. Pritchard (2007).

  17. 17.

    Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi visited North Korea in 2002 and 2004 to discuss the normalization of diplomatic relations between Tokyo and Pyongyang. The incentive for Koizumi to visit Pyongyang was to negotiate the return home of Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea between 1977 and 1983.

  18. 18.

    Pritchard, ibid., 105.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 107.

  20. 20.

    David Stout (2006).

  21. 21.

    DPRK Foreign Ministry Refutes (2006).

  22. 22.

    Ministry of Unification of South Korea, “Kaesong Gongdan,” http://www.unikorea.go.kr/

  23. 23.

    Kim Youn-Suk (2006).

  24. 24.

    Thomas F. Cargill (2009).

  25. 25.

    Kim Youn-Suk, ibid., 65.

  26. 26.

    Kim Youn-Suk compared North Korea’s status with that of Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union. With help from international institutions and the European Union, Eastern European states were able to successfully transition to market economies. Contrary to Eastern European states, North Korea has not abolished its Marxist ideology or its planned economy. The KIC is therefore not comparable to this transition as North Korea still suffers from international sanctions and does not have access to loans from international financial institutors such as the World Bank or the IMF.

  27. 27.

    Troy Stangarone (2009).

  28. 28.

    Andrew Salmon (2007).

  29. 29.

    Maritime Peace Zone to Expand Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation (2007).

  30. 30.

    Ibid.

  31. 31.

    Jong-hee Kang et al. (2006).

  32. 32.

    At the nongovernmental level, the initiative role of the Hanns Seidel Foundation (HSS) is worthy of note. As part of the assistance program to North Korea’s capacity-building, HSS Korea proposed to create “the Integrated Fisheries Foundation Center” (IFFC) in North Korea. The activity plans include sharing “the German experience with maritime and fisheries cooperation before unification and the course of fishery policy after unification” and continuing assistance to the IFFC “through exchange programmes and training programmes in Germany.” Sun-hee Um, Sung-gul Hong, and Soo-jung Choi (2008).

  33. 33.

    Dae-suk Kang and Chong-ho Nam (2003).

  34. 34.

    Jong-hee Kang et al., ibid., 182

  35. 35.

    The United Nations (2009).

  36. 36.

    Chinese Boats (2009).

  37. 37.

    Illegal Chinese Fishing (2008).

  38. 38.

    John M. Glionna (2008).

  39. 39.

    Sung-kul Hong, Hun-dong Lee, and Hak-bong Jang (2006); Terence Roehrig (2009); Jon M. van Dyke (2003).

  40. 40.

    South Korea Resolute on Sea Border (1999).

  41. 41.

    Korean Navies Exchange Fire (2009).

  42. 42.

    John Pike (2009).

  43. 43.

    van Dyke, ibid., 531.

  44. 44.

    Roehrig, ibid., 17.

  45. 45.

    van Dyke, ibid., 536.

  46. 46.

    Two Koreas Issue Peace Declaration (2007).

  47. 47.

    Salmon, ibid.

References

  • Barna, Brian J. 1998. An Economic Roadmap to Korean Unification: Pitfalls and Prospects. Asian Survey 38 no. 3: 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, Thomas F. 2009. A Perspective on Institutional Change in North Korea. North Korean Review 5 no. 1: 90–104, 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Boats ‘Increasingly Violating’ South Korean Waters – Police. BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific November 6, 2007. http://www.redorbit.com/news/business/297114/chinese_boats_increasingly_violating_south_kor ean_waters__police/# (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Choo, Jae-woo. 2005. Is Institutionalization of the Six-Party Talks Possible? East Asia 22 no. 4: 43–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Karen S., Russell Hardin, and Margaret Levi. 2007. Cooperation Without Trust? New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPRK Foreign Ministry Refutes Resolution of UN Security Council. Korean News. July 16, 2006. edition. http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2006/200607/news07/18.htm#1 (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Dyke, Jon M. van. 2003. The Republic of Korea’s Maritime Boundaries. International Journal of Marine & Coastal Law 18 no. 4: 530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glionna, John M. 2008. Violence in Korean Waters Raises Animosity Toward China. Los Angeles Times. October 1, 2008. http://articles.latimes.com/2008/oct/01/world/fg-fishermen1 (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Kim, Hak-Joon. 1993. Korean Reunification: A Seoul Perspective. In Korea Under Roh Tae-woo: Democratisation, Northern Policy and Inter-Korean Relations, eds. J. Cotton. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Aaron. 2007. The Structural Causes of Trusting Relationships: Why Rivals Do Not Overcome Suspicion Step by Step. Political Science Quarterly 122 no. 2: 287–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Sung-kul, Hun-dong Lee, and Hak-bong Jang. 2006. A Study on the Effective Execution of the Inter- Korean Cooperation Fund in the Fisheries Sector. Special Research 34: 69–73. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Philip Young P. 2008. Reunification of Korea: A Social Development Approach to Resolving the Korean Conflict. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare 24 no. 1: 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illegal Chinese Fishing. 2008. The Korea Times. September 28, 2008 edition. http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2009/07/202_31784.html (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Kaesong Gongdan. Ministry of Unification of South Korea. http://www.unikorea.go.kr/.

  • Kang, Dae-suk, and Chong-ho Nam. 2003. “Seohaeyeonan Jeopkyeongjiyeok Nambookhan Hyeopryeok kwanri bangan Yeongu” [A Study on the Yellow Sea Border under the Joint Management of South and North Korea]. Basic Research 02: 15–26. Seoul: Korean Maritime Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Jong-hee et al. 2006. A Study on Cooperation Plans in the Field of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in Preparation for Unification Between South and North Korea. Basic Research 21: 165-171. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Youn-Suk. 2006. An Increasing Inter-Korean Economic Integration: The Case of the Gaeseong Industrial Park. North Korean Review 2 no. 2: 62–75, 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissel, Mary. 2009. South Korea’s Bulldozer Heads for the White House: The New President Is Taking a Tough Line on North Korea. Will the U.S. Support Him. The Wall Street Journal. June 13 edition. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124484758194711341.htm (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Korean Navies Exchange Fire. CNN News. November 10, 2009. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/11/10/koreas.naval.clash/ (accessed December 1, 2009).

  • Maritime Peace Zone to Expand Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation (2007). The Korean Culture and Information Service. http://www.korea.net/news/news/newsview.asp?Serial_no=20071009023&part=102&searchday (accessed July 1, 2009)

  • Park, John S. 2005. Inside Multilateralism: The Six-Party Talks. Washington Quarterly 28 no. 4 (Autumn): 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, John. 2005. Northern Limit Line (NLL) West Sea Naval Engagements. GlobalSecurity.org. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/nll.htm (accessed December 1, 2009).

  • Pollack, Jonathan, and Chung Min Lee. 1999. Preparing for Korean Unification: Scenarios and Implications. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • President Roh Does Not Want the North to Collapse. Kyunghyang Newspaper. April 14, 2005. http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=200504141837431&code=910203 (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Pritchard, Charles L. 2007. Failed Diplomacy: The Tragic Story of How North Korea Got the Bomb. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, Leigh. 2006. Cooperation Without Trust: Overcoming Collective Action Barriers to Endangered Species Protection. Policy Studies Journal 34 no. 1: 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, Terence. 2009. North Korea and the Northern Limit Line. North Korean Review 5 no. 1: 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Andrew. 2007. Summit produces 9 points for peace; Leaders agree on ‘core point.’ The Washington Times .October 5 edition. http://www.bookrags.com/highbeam/summit-produces-9-points-for-peace-20071005-hb/ (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Schiffer, Michael. 2009. No Hugging, No Learning: Taking Stock of 2008. Shifting Strategic and Political Relations with the Koreas Joint US-Korea Academic Studies 19: 12. Washington DC: KEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin Hanbando Gusang [A New Vision for the Korean Peninsula]. Keynote Speech of President Lee Myung-bak at the Global Forum held on September 10, 2007. http://www.615gg.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=sub_5_1&wr_id=69&page=4 ( accessed July 1, 2009).

  • South Korea Resolute on Sea Border. BBC News. September 3, 1999. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia- pacific/436160.stm (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Stangarone, Troy. Uncertain Cloud Hangs over Kaesong. Korea Insight. June 2, 2009. http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/kei/issues/2009-06-02/2.html (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Stout, David. 2006. Bush Urges North Korea to Drop Missile Program. The New York Times. July 5 edition. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/06/world/americas/06iht-eb.0705missile.2127416.html (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The United Nations. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_agreements.htm (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Two Koreas Issue Peace Declaration. The Chosun Ilbo. October 4, 2007. http://english.chosun.com/cgi- bin/printNews?id=200710040031 (accessed July 1, 2009).

  • Um, Sun-hee, Sung-gul Hong, and Soo-jung Choi. 2008. Gookjehyupryoekul tonghal Bookhan Soosankaebalsaup Jaewonjodal bangan [Fund Supply Options through International Cooperation for North Korea’s Fisheries Development]. Policy Research 05: 167–168. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, Toshio, Satoshi Kanazawa, Rie Mashima, and Shigeru Terai. 2005. Separating Trust from Cooperation in a Dynamic Relationship: Prisoner’s Dilemma with Variable Dependence. Rationality and Society 17 no. 3: 275–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Young-Sun. 2001. The Cost and Financing of Korean Unification. In Perspectives on Korean Unification and Economic Integration, eds. Y. B. Choi, Y. Merrill, Y. Y. Yang, and S. Chang. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martyn de Bruyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bruyn, M., Bae, S. (2011). An Institutional Approach to Peace and Prosperity: Toward a Korean Fisheries Community. In: Seliger, B., Pascha, W. (eds) Towards a Northeast Asian Security Community. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9657-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics