Skip to main content
  • 967 Accesses

Abstract

The connection between economics and ecology1 runs much deeper than the identical first two syllables of their respective names. Theories of evolution for each have directly and indirectly influenced each other for a long time in a symbiotic pattern. Both fields have shared a division between those theories of evolution emphasizing a gradualist continuity and those emphasizing a punctuationist discontinuity. We shall see how views on this division have moved between economics and ecology in an extended dialogue.

This natural inequality of the two powers of population, and of population in the earth, and that great law of our nature which must constantly keep their effects equal, form the great difficulty that to me appears insurmountable in the way to the perfectibility of society. All other arguments are of slight and subordinate consideration in comparison of this. I see no way by which man can escape from the weight of this law which pervades all nature.

Thomas Robert Malthus (1798, Essay on the Principle of Population, p. 16).

Man is to a considerable degree the artificer of his own fortune. We can apply our reflections and our ingenuity to the remedy of whatever we regret

William Godwin (1820, On Population, p. 615)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alchian, Armen A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan, Akhtar A. 1986. “Marshallian and Schumpeterian Theories of Economic Evolution: Gradualism vs Punctualism.” Atlantic Economic Journal 14, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazykin, A.D., A.S. Khibnik, and E.A. Aponina. 1983. “A Model of Evolutionary Appearance of Dissipative Structure in Ecosystems.” Journal of Mathematical Biology 18, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Jess and Richard H. Day. 1980. “Erratic Accumulation.” Economics Letters 6, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. 1978. Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. 1981. Evolutionary Economics. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. 1989. “Economics as an Ecology of Commodities.” Mimeo, University of Coloragdo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Colin W. 1976. Mathematical Bioeconomics. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Frederic E. 1916. Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington: Carnegie Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E. 1968. “Economics as a Life Science.” Journal of Political Economy 76, 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard H. 1983. “The Emergence of Chaos from Classical Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, M.M. 1976. “Darwin’s Law of Natural Selection and Thom’s Theory of Catastrophes.” Mathematical Biosciences 28, 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, Manfred and Peter Schuster. 1979. The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, A.E. 1952. “The Supra-Organismic Aspects of Society.” Coloqques CNRS 34, 333–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Friedrich. 1940. The Dialectics of Nature. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Alan. 1987. “The Slime Mold Dictosteliam as a Model of Self-Organization in the Social Systems,” in F. Eugene Yates, ed., Self-Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order. New York: Plenum Press, 181–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Gerhard. 1983. “On the Dynamics of Evolutionary Discontinuities.” Mathematical Biosciences 67, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, Kurt. 1931. “Über Formal Unentscheidbare satze der Principia Mathematica und Verwandter Systeme I.” Monatshefte fur Mathematik und Physik 38, 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Richard M. 1967. “A Growth Cycle,” in C.H. Feinstein, ed., Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Richard M. 1986. “The Economy as an Evolutionary Pulsator.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Scott. 1989. “Darwin and Political Economy: The Connection Reconsidered.” Journal of the History of Biology 22, 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.R. 1972. “Extinction of a Fishery by Commercial Exploitation: A Note.” Journal of Political Economy 80, 1031–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1987. “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?,” in F. Eugene Yates, ed., Self-Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order. New York: Plenum Press, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guckenheimer, John H., G. Oster, and A. Ipaktchi. 1977. “The Dynamics of Density Dependent Populations.” Journal of Mathematical Biology 4, 101–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1932. The Causes of Evolution. London: Longmans and Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1940. Preface to Engels, Friedrich. The Dialectics of Nature. New York: International Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, Erich. 1982. “From Self-Reference to Self-Transcendence: The Evolution of Self-Organization Dynamics,” in William C. Schieve and Allen, Peter M., eds., Self-Organization and Dissipative Structures. Austin: University of Texas Press, 344–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Lamar B. 1989. “Schumpeter versus Darwin: re Malthus.” Southern Economic Journal 56, 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, Michal. 1935. “A Macrodynamic Theory of Business Cycles.” Econometrica 3, 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, Motoo. 1968. “Evolutionary Rate at the Molocular Level.” Nature 217, 624–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don. 1989. “Economic Chaos or Spontaneous Order? Implications for Political Economy of the New View of Science.” Cato Journal 8, 613–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, Richard A. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, Alfred J. 1920. “Analytical Notes on Certain Rhythmic Relations in Organic Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States 6, 410–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, Alfred J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1952. Theories of Surplus Value, Vol. II. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1942. Selected Correspondence. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert M. 1974. “Biological Populations with Non-Overlapping Generations: Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos.” Science 186, 645–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert M. 1976. “Simple Mathematical Models with Very Complicated Dynamics.” Nature 261, 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert M. and George F. Oster. 1976. “Bifurcating and Dynamic Complexity in Simple Ecological Models.” American Naturalist 110, 573–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, Ronald L. 1954. Marx and Engels on Malthus. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosekilde, Erik, Steen Rasmussen, and Torben S. Sorensen. 1983. “Self-Organization and Stochastic Re-causalization in System Dynamics Models,” in J.D.W. Morecroft, D.F. Andersen, and John D. Sterman, eds., Proceedings of the 1983 International System Dynamics Conference. Chestnut Hill: Pine Manor College, 128–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter. 1974. “Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth.” Economic Journal 84, 886–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, Grégoire and Ilya Prigogine. 1977. Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, Eugene P. 1953. Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Michael S. 1987. Marx’s Crises Theory: Scarcity, Labor, and Finance. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki, Michael J. 1990. “Institutional Dynamics, Deterministic Chaos, and Self-Organizing Systems.” Journal of Economic Issues 24, 57–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, D.R. and Erik Mosekilde. 1988. “Bifurcations and Chaos in a Generic Management Model.” European Journal of Operations Research 35, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1942. “The Stability of Equilibrium: Linear and Nonlinear Systems.” Econometrica 10, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. 1967. “A Universal Cycle?,” in R. Henn, ed., Methods of Operations Research III. Muhlgasse: Verlag Anton Hain, 170–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1852. “A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility.” Westminster Review 57, 499–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, Alan M. 1952. “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 237, 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein B. 1898. “Why is Economics Not An Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12, 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V. 1931. Lecons sur la Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte pour la Vie. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, John. 1937. “Über ein Okonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunkssatzes.” Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquims 8, 73–83 (English translation, 1945, “A Model of General Equilibrium.” Review of Economic Studies 13, 1–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster, Donald. 1977. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. 1980b. “A Basic Model of Urban Dynamics Expressed as a Set of Volterra-Lotka Equations,” in Dimitrios S. Dendrinos, ed., Catastrophe Theory in Urban and Transport Analysis, Report No. DOT/RSPA/DPB-25/80/20. Washington: US Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Henry Mulally. 1985. Urban Evolution: Studies in the Mathematical Ecology of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Henry Mulally. 1981. “Evolutionaly Patterns of Urban Populations.” Geographical Analysis 13, 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Henry Mulally. 1983a. “Empirical Evidence of Volterra-Lotka Dynamics in United States Metropolitan Areas: 1940–1977,” in Griffith, Daniel A. and Lea, Anthony C., eds., Evolving Geographical Structures: Mathematical Models and Theories for Space-Time Processes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 170–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Michael Sonis. 1987. “The Onset of Turbulence in Discrete Relative Multiple Spatial Dynamics.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 22, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Michael Sonis. 1988. “Nonlinear Discrete Relative Population Dynamics of the U.S. Regions.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 25, 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Michael Sonis. 1989. Turbulence and Socio-Spatial Dynamics: Toward a Theory of Social Systems Evolution. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. and Michael Sonis. 1990. “Signatures of Chaos: Rules in Sequences of Spatial Stock Size Distributions for Discrete Relative Dynamics?” Occasional Paper Series on Socio-Spatial Dynamics 1, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen, Johann Heinrich. 1826. Der Isolierte Staat in Biechiezung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationaleckonomie. Hamburg: Perthes (English translation by Wartenberg, C.M., 1966, The Isolated State. New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles and Alfred Russel Wallace. 1858. “On the Tendency of Species to Form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Means of Natural Selection.” Journal of the Linnaean Society (Zoology) 3, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard H. 1989. “Dynamical Systems, Adaptation and Economic Evolution.” MRG Working Paper No. M8908, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, Carolus. 1751. “Specimen Academicum de Oeconomia Naturae.” Amoenitates Academicae 2, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall. 1931. “Evolution in Mendelian Populations.” Genetics 16, 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard H. and Jean-Luc Walter. 1989. “Economic Growth in the Very Long Run: On the Multiple Interaction of Population, Technology, and Social Infrastructure,” in William A. Barnett, John Geweke, and Karl Shell, eds., Economic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles and Nonlinearity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 253–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Walter, Charles L. Choguli, John Kissin, Richard H. Seyforth, and Richard Tatlock. 1972. Economic-Ecologic Analysis for Regional Development. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. Barkley, Jr. 1978b. “A Reconsideration of Marx’s Critique of Malthus’s Principle of Population.” Virginia Social Science Journal 13, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, Thomas Robert. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J. Johnson (1817, 5th Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale, Steve. 1976. “On the Differential Equations of Species in Competition.” Journal of Mathematical Biology 3, 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst. 1866. Generelle Morphogi der Organismen. Berlin: G. Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. Barkley, Jr. 1992 [1991]. “The Dialogue Between the Economic and the Ecologic Theories of Evolution.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1911. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot (English translation by Redvers Opie, 1934, The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, Gerald, Giovanni Dosi, and Luigi Orsenigo. 1988. “Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-Organization Model.” Economic Journal 98, 1032–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. 1842. Enzyclopdie der Philosophischen Wissenscheften im Grundrisse, Part 1, Logik, Vol. VI. Berlin: Duncken und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1899. Principles of Biology, 2nd Edition. New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Barkley Rosser .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosser, J.B. (2011). Perspectives on Economic and Ecologic Evolution. In: Complex Evolutionary Dynamics in Urban-Regional and Ecologic-Economic Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8828-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics