Skip to main content

Species Definition and Differentiation as Seen in the Postcranial Skeleton of Cebus

  • Chapter

Abstract

A critical aspect of any study of evolutionary process is an understanding of the nature and distinctiveness of species. While species are generally recognized as real entities, the identification of members of a species remains problematic, particularly for members of a paleospecies. Most researchers seek analogues in the defining differences among modern species, but little of this work has focused on the postcranial skeleton. Recent studies have shown that most species differences are manifested in the soft tissue, but several studies have documented some hard tissue differences between closely related species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chapman, C.A., 1987, Flexibility in diets of three species of Costa Rican primates, Folia Primatol. 49:90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C.A., and Fedigan, L.M., 1990, Dietary differences between neighboring Cebus capucinus groups: Local traditions, food availability or responses to food profitability? Folia Primatol. 54: 177–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., 1983, Species concepts and speciation analysis. Current Ornithology 1: 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daegling, D.J., 1992, Mandibular morphology and diet in the genus Cebus. Int. J. Primatol. 13: 545–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T., 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, C.W., 1980, Pairwise multiple comparisons in the homogeneous variance, unequal sample size case. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75: 789–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., 1993, What, if anything, is a species? In: W.H. Kimbel and L.B. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J., 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, L.H., 1990, Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J.G., and Mittermeier, R.A., 1980, Locomotor behavior, body size, and comparative ecology of seven Surinam monkeys. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 52: 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J.G., and Mittermeier, R.A., 1981, Differential habitat use by Cebus apella and Saimiri sciureus in Central Surinam. Primates 22: 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S.M., 1980, A systematic revision of the Platyrrhini based on selected features of the postcranium, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S.M., 1988, Postcranial adaptations of the earliest platyrrhine. J. Hum. Evol. 17:155–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S.M., and Davis, L.C., 1992, Systematics and body size: Implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 88: 415–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S.M., and Hobbs, D.G., in prep, Intra-generic variability in form and function: the case of Cebus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich, J.W., 1996, Primate species: the irreversible units in the evolution of our mammalian divergence. Amer. J. Primatol 38:271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B.M.F., Duffy, J.B., Odwak, H, Purff, R.C.M., Vasey, P., 1993, Postcrania and the specific mate recognition system. Hum. Evol. 8:281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebo, D.L., 1992, Locomotor and postural behavior in Alouatta palliata and Cebus capucinus. Am. J. Primatol. 26: 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L. and Marks, J., 1991, The nature and origins of primate species. Yearbook Phys. Anthropol. 34:39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, A.J., 1984, A proof of the conjecture that the Tukey-Kramer Method is conservative. The Annals of Statistics 12: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P., 1949, Mammal of northern Colombia. Preliminary report no. 4: monkeys (Primates), with taxonomic revisions of some forms. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 98: 323–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson, C.H., and Boinski, S., 1992, Morphological and behavioral adaptations for foraging in generalist primates: The case of the cebines. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 88: 483–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W.L. and Fleagle, J.G., 1980, Postnatal growth allometry of the extremities in Cebus albifrons and Cebus apella: a longitudinal and comparative study. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 53:471–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W.H., and Martin, L.B. (eds.), 1993a, Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution., New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W.H., and Martin, L.B. (1993b) Species and speciation: conceptual issues and their relevance for primate evolutionary biology. In: W.H. Kimbel and L.B. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution. New York: Plenum Press pp. 539–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W.G., 1982, Distribution of primates and forest refuges. In: G.J. Prance (ed.), Biological Diversification in the Tropics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 455–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C.Y., 1956, Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12:307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D.M., and Paterson,, H.E.H., 1982, Morphological resemblance and its relationships to genetic distance measures. Evol. Theory 5: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D.M., and Spencer, H.G., 1995, Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J.C., 1993, Primates and paradigms: problems with the identification of genetic species. In: W.H. Kimbel and L.b. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, New York: Plenum Press pp. 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, T.J., 1995, Morphological relationships between the Ka’apor capuchin (Cebus kaapori Queiroz, 1992) and other male Cebus crania: a preliminary report. Neotropical Primates 3(4): 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1942, Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.G., Jr., 1981, Simultaneous Statistical Inference. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. and Coimbra-Filho, A.F., 1981, Systematics: species and subspecies. In: A.F. Coimbra-Filho and R.A. Mittermeier (eds.), Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1, Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências, pp. 29–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. and van Roosmalen, M.G.M., 1981, Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys. Folia primatol. 36: 1–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B., and Coimbra-Filho, A.F., 1988, Systematics: species and subspecies: an update. In: R.A. Mittermeier, A.B. Rylands, A.F. Coimbra-Filho, and G.A.B. da Fonseca (eds.), Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 2, Washington D.C.: World Wildlife Fund, pp. 13–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, D., and Endler, J.A. (eds.), 1989, Speciation and its Consequences, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H.E.H., 1978, More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. South African Journal of Science 74: 369–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, H.L., 1992, A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben, 1777 (Cebidae: Primates) from Eastern Brazilian Amazonia. Goeldiana Zoologia 15: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.G., 1981, Spatial structure of foraging groups of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus nigrivittatus). Anim. Behav. 29: 1036–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K.D. and Bown, T., 1993, Species concepts and species recognition in Eocene primates. In: W.H. Kimbel and L.b. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 299–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger, A.L., 1992, Evolution of feeding niches in New World monkeys. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 88: 525–562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1989, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1994, JMP 3.0: Statistics Made Visual, Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G., 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F.S., 1993, Species concepts: the tested, the untestable, and the redundant. In: W.H. Kimbel and L.B. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teaford, M.F., Walker, A., and Mugaisi, G.S., 1993, Species discrimination in Proconsul from Rusinga and Mfan-gano Islands, Kenya. In: W.H. Kimbel and L.B. Martin (eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J., 1983, Five New World Primates. A study in comparative ecology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres de Assumpcao, C, 1986, Resultados preliminares de reavaliacao das rac.as do macaco-prego Cebus apella (Primates: Cebidae). In: M. T. de Mello (ed.), A Primatologia no Brasil, Vol. 2, Brasilia, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia, pg. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C, 1988, Resultados preliminares de reavaliaâão das racas do macaco-prego Cebus apella (Primates: Cebidae). Revta. nordest. Biol. 6(1): 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. and Chamberlain, A., 1989, Speciation, morphological change and the status of African Homo erectus. J.Hum.Evol. 18: 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C.P., and van Noordwijk, M.A., 1989, The special role of male Cebus monkeys in predation avoidance and its effect on group composition. Behav. Ecol Sociobiol. 24: 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E.O., 1978, The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Systematic Zoology 27: 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ford, S.M., Hobbs, D.G. (1996). Species Definition and Differentiation as Seen in the Postcranial Skeleton of Cebus . In: Norconk, M.A., Rosenberger, A.L., Garber, P.A. (eds) Adaptive Radiations of Neotropical Primates. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8770-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8770-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4686-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8770-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics