Skip to main content

LGC: An Active Congestion Control Mechanism

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 583))

Abstract

This paper presents the design and evaluation of Limiting Greedy Connections (LGC), an active congestion control mechanism for minimizing the degradation in network performance caused by bandwidth greedy applications. The primary objectives of the LGC mechanism are to limit the impact of greedy connections on a congested node, to keep a loose upper bound on the packet queue occupancy at the intermediate nodes of the network, and to minimize packet loss. The LGC mechanism is evaluated for a variety of network topologies, transmitting sources, and node queue parameters, using a Java-based active network test bed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Braden, D. Clark, J. Crowcroft, B. Davie, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Floyd, V. Jacobson, G. Minshall, C. Partridge, L. Peterson, K. Ramakrishnan, S. Shenker,  J. Wroclawski, L. Zhang, Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet, Request for Comments: 2309, April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Yang and A. V. S. Reddy, A Taxonomy for Congestion Control Algorithms in Packet Switched Networks. IEEE Network Magazine July/August 1995, Volume 9, Number 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Lin and R. Morris, Dynamics of Early Detection. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM97 Conference, Cannes, France, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. L. Tennenhouse, J.M. Smith, W. David Sincoskie, David J. Wetherall and Gary J. Minden, A Survey of Active Network Research. IEEE Communications Magazine, January 1997, pp. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Transmission Control Protocol, Request for Comments: 793. September 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Floyd and K. Fall, Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol.7, Issue 4, pp. 458–472, Aug. 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Floyd and V. Jacobson, Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp 397–413, Aug. 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prabhavalkar, N., Parashar, M., Agrawal, P. (2000). LGC: An Active Congestion Control Mechanism. In: Hariri, S., Lee, C.A., Raghavendra, C.S. (eds) Active Middleware Services. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 583. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8648-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8648-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4657-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8648-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics