Abstract
This chapter describes a number of research fields that are closely related to learning design and discusses how they have been used as a means of promoting more effective teaching practices. This chapter looks explicitly at the ways in which learning and teaching innovations have been promoted and supported. It considers the strategies that have been used to scaffold teaching practice to ensure effective use of good pedagogy and to promote innovative use of new technologies. The approaches to supporting teacher practice discussed in this chapter are instructional design, the learning sciences, learning objects and open educational resources, pedagogical patterns, and professional networks and support centres.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is discussed in Chapter 6.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
Forces are essentially the constraints or influences associated with the problem that is being solved.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
References
Alexander, C. (1977). Pattern languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Balatsoukas, P., Morris, A., & O’Brian, A. (2008). Learning objects update: Review and critical approach to content aggregation. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 119–130. Available online at http://www.ifests.info/journals/11_2/11.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
Bergin, J. (n.d.). Some pedagogical patterns. Available online at http://csis.pace.edu/%7Ebergin/patterns/fewpedpats.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals: Handbook 1 – Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school – Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Carle, A., Clancy, M., & Canny, J. (2007, March 7–10). Working with pedagogical patterns in PACT: Initial applications and observations. Paper presented at the SIGSCE, Kentucky.
Chatteur, F., Carvalho, L., & Dong, A. (2010). Embedding pedagogical principles and theories into design patterns. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 183–200). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Conole, G. (2007). Relationship between policy and practice – The gap between rhetoric and reality. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of e-learning research, e-learning research handbook (pp. 286–310). London: Sage.
Conole, G. (2008). Capturing practice, the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinhi, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of learning designs and learning objects. Hershey: IGI Global.
Conole, G., & McAndrew, P. (2010). A new approach to supporting the design and use of OER: Harnessing the power of Web 2.0. In M. Edner & M. Schiefner (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology enhanced education: Ubiquitous learning and the digital nature. Hershey: IGI Global.
Conole, G., Smith, J., & White, S. (2007). A critique of the impact of policy and funding. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Design, I. (n.d.). The instructional design website. Available online at http://www.instructionaldesign.org/. Accessed 17 June 2010.
Frizell, S. S., & Hubscher, R. (2008). Using design patterns to support e-learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (pp. 144–166). Hershey: IGI Global.
Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Garzotto, F., & Retalis, S. (2008). A critical perspective on design patterns for e-learning. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects (pp. 113–143). Hershey: IGI Global.
Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101.
Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Goodyear, P., & Yang, D. F. (2008). Patterns and pattern languages: Supporting understanding and performance in educational design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies. Hershey: IGI Global.
Gustafson, K. L., & Tillman, M. H. (1991). Introduction. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson, & M. H. Tillman (Eds.), Instructional design: Principles and applications (2nd ed., pp. 3–8). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publishers.
Hohanson, B., Miller, C., & Hooper, S. (2008). Commodity, firmness, and delight: Four modes of instructional design practice. In L. Botturi & T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices (pp. 1–17). Hershey/New York: Information Science Reference.
Littlejohn, A. (2003). Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Littlejohn, A., Falconer, I., & McGill, L. (2008). Characterising effective eLearning resources. Computers and Education, 50(3), 757–771. Available online at http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/people/falconer.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Harper, B. (2008). Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects. Hershey: IGI Global.
Magnussen, E. (2006, June). Pedagogical patterns – A method to capture best practices in teaching and learning. Paper presented at the 4:e ogiska inspirationskonferensen, LTH, Lund University.
McAndrew, P., Santos, A., Lane, A., Godwin, S., Okada, A., & Wilson, T. (2009). OpenLearn research report 2006–2008. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models III. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mor, Y., Warburton, S., & Winters, N. (2012). Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology. London: Sense Publishers.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
Petrides, L., & Jimes, C. (2006). Open educational resources: Towards a new educational paradigm. iJournal, 14. Available online at http://www.ijournal.us/issue_14/ij_14_04_articleframe_Petrides_Jimes. Accessed 20 Sept 2011.
Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4). 2003–02. Available online at http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewArticle/89/88. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. New York: Routledge.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. III). London: Routledge.
Reiser, R. A. (2001). The history of instructional design and technology: Part 1: A history of instructional media. ETRandD, 49(1), 53–64.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sutcliffe, A. (2003). Multimedia and virtual reality – Designing multisensory user interfaces. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Boot, E. (2005). A holistic pedagogical view of learning objects: Future directions for reuse. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazada, A. V. Schaack, & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor and a taxonomy. Learning Technology, 2830(435), 1–35.
Wiley, D. (2005). Learning objects in public and Higher Education. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. V. Schaack, & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wiley, D., & Gurrell, S. (2009). A decade of development…. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 11–21. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/02680510802627746. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conole, G. (2012). Related Research Fields. In: Designing for Learning in an Open World. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8516-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8517-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)