Skip to main content

In Search of Excellence? An International Perspective on Governance of University Research

  • Chapter
Book cover Universities in Transition

Part of the book series: Insight and Innovation in International Development ((IIID))

Abstract

A research policy doctrine characterized by resource concentration to fewer ­universities and areas selected on the basis of their scientific excellence is emerging worldwide. The doctrine is based on the assumed contributions of high-quality research environments to industrial innovation. The foundation of the governance model is a fusion of the linear model – stressing academic self-organization – and the innovation systems model, emphasizing the systemic interaction between ­academic research, and the economy and significance of clusters around leading universities and research environments. This chapter traces the emergence and rise to prominence of this policy paradigm in several OECD countries. It is discussed, on the basis of the material from the UniDev country case studies, if this model is transferable to developing countries.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of the Sciences) 2005 AAAS Analysis of R&D in the FY 2005. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach PG, Balán J, eds. (2007). Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America: World Class Worldwide. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker W, Dietz J (2004). R&D Cooperation and Innovation Activities of Firms – Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry. Research Policy 33: 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner M (2003). The Scandinavian Challenge: The Future of Advanced Welfare States in the Knowledge Economy. Acta Sociologica 46 (2): 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein A (2003). Canadian Institutes of Health Research Budgetary Dilemma. Canadian Medical Association Journal 169: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman B, Dietz JS (2001). Research Policy Trends in the United States, in Larédo P, Mustar P, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy, 47–78. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun D, Benninghoff M (2003). Policy learning in Swiss research policy – the case of the National Centers of Competence in Research. Research Policy 32; 10: 1849–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BR (1983). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2004). Biosciences and the rise of regional science policy. Science and Public Policy 31; 3: 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori GS, et al. (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity. Stanford: Stanford Universty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2004). Science Budget 04: Focus on Excellence and Greater Value. Downloaded at: www.minocw.nl/english/doc/2004/sciencebudget.pdf.

  • Elzinga A, Jamison A (1995). Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology, in Jasanoff, Sheila, et al., eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 572–597. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H (2001). MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H (2003). Research Groups as ‘Quasi-Firms’: The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University, Research Policy 32; 1: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger R (2004). Knowledge and Money: Research Universities and the Paradox of the Marketplace. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou L (2001). The United Kingdom National System of Research, Technology and Innovation, in Larédo P, Mustar P, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy, 253–296. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuna A, Martin BR (2003). University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison’, Minerva 41: 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M (2001). Governance and the New Production of Knowledge, in de la Mothe J, ed. Science, Technology and Governance, 33–49. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen M, Etzkowitz H (1999). Convergence Between Europe and America: The Transition from Industrial to Innovation Policy. Journal of Technology Transfer 24 (2–3): 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson M, Rosenberg N (2001). Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-Based Entrepreneurship: Lessons from The US and Sweden. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (2): 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth JR, Boyer R, eds. (1997). Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth JR, et al. (2008). China: The end of the science superpowers, Nature 454, 412–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M, Lundqvist M, Hellsmark H (2003). Entrepreneurial Transformation in the Swedish University System. Research Policy 32; 9: 1555–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop B (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser R, Prange H (2004). The Reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems – The Example of German Biotechnology. Research Policy 33 (2004): 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim L (2002). Lika Olika. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina K (2000). Epistemic Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull W (2003). Toward a Research Policy for the New Europe: Changes and Challenges for Public and Private Funders. Minerva 42: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larédo P, Mustar P (2003). Public Sector Research: A Growing Role in Innovation Systems. Minerva 42: 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemola T (2004). Finnish Science and Technology Policy, in Schienstock G ed. Embracing the Knowledge Economy, 268–286. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson S (2006). The Anglo-American university at its global high tide. Minerva 44: 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin BR (2003). The Changing Social Contract for Research and the Evolution of the University, in Geuna A, Salter AJ, Steinmueller W, eds. Science and Innovation, 7–29. Chaltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer F (2001). The German Innovation System, in Larédo P, Mustar P, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy, 205–252. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC (2001). The United States National Innovation System after the Cold War, in Larédo P, Mustar P, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, et al. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (2004). The Market Economy, and the Scientific Commons. Research Policy 33 (2004): 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2003). Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva 41: 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (2000). Public Policies to Support Basic Research. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(3): 761–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (2001). Why European Union funding of academic research should be increased: a radical proposal, Science and Public Policy, 27(6): 455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW. et al. (2003). The spatial clustering of science and capital. Regional Studies, 36(3): 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • PREST (Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology) (2000). Impact of the Research Assessment Exercise and the Future of Quality Assurance in the light of Changes in the Research Landscape. Manchester: PREST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes M (2000). Restructuring the British Welfare State, in Scharpf FW, Schmidt VA, eds. Welfare and Work in the Pen Economy, Vol. 2, 19–68. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccaboni M, et al. (2003). Public Research and Industrial Innovation, in Geuna, A, et al. Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance, 169–201. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronayne J (1984). Science in Government. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage JD (1999). Funding Science in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf FW (2000). Economic Changes, Vulnerabilities, and Institutional Capabilities, in Scharpf FW, Schmidt VA, eds. Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. 1, 21–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt VA (2002). The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skoie H (1996). Basic research – a new funding climate. Science and Public Policy 23: 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoie H (2000). Diversity and Identity: The Merger of Five Research Councils in Norway. Science and Public Policy 27, 2: 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes DE (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (2008). Re-Forming Capitalism. Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen K (2004). How Institutions Evolve. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meulen B, Rip A (2001). The Netherlands, in Larédo P, Mustar P, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy, 297–324. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (2000). Divergent Capitalisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong J (1998). Geographically Localized Knowledge. Economic Inquiry 36, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 International Development Research Centre

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benner, M. (2011). In Search of Excellence? An International Perspective on Governance of University Research. In: Göransson, B., Brundenius, C. (eds) Universities in Transition. Insight and Innovation in International Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics