Skip to main content

Questioning the Link Between Stone Tool Standardization and Behavioral Modernity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover New Perspectives on Old Stones

Abstract

For more than 20 years, it has been claimed that standardization is a ­feature of Upper Paleolithic retouched stone tools, as compared to Middle Paleolithic ones, and reflects the stricter application of mental templates to stone tool-making (e.g., Mellars, Curr Anthropol 30:349–385, 1989a). More recently, this claim has been modified to include stone tool standardization as a feature of modern human behavior (e.g., Klein, J World Prehistory 9:167–198, 1995). It has been argued elsewhere (Chase 1991, Monnier, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17:341–350, 2007) that standardization and apparent imposition of form in retouched tools reflect factors other than adherence to mental templates. This study tests the notion that standardization is a feature of behavioral modernity by comparing artifact standardization among Middle Paleolithic, Upper Paleolithic, and Neolithic assemblages from western Switzerland. It uses a 2D geometric morphometric approach to quantify variance in shape within selected tool types. The results show that the most highly standardized types occur in the Upper Paleolithic assemblage. Neolithic types are significantly less standardized than Upper Paleolithic types, and are not more standardized than Middle Paleolithic ones. This suggests that degree of standardization does not correlate strongly with behavioral modernity; rather, the occurrence of highly standardized tools in many Upper Paleolithic assemblages is a feature unique to the Upper Paleolithic, and the reasons for it most likely do not directly reflect mental templates or any other cognitive factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affolter, J., 2002. Provenance des silex préhistoriques du Jura et des regions limitrophes. Service et Musée cantonal d’archéologie (Archéologie neuchâteloise, 28; 2 vol.), Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B., 2006. Annexe 2, Une operation exceptionnelle: le prélèvement et le transport d’un ­volume archéologique de 400 tonnes. In Le site magdalénien de Monruz, 1. Premiers elements pour l’analyse d’un habitat de plein air, edited by J. Bullinger, D. Leesch and N. Plumettaz, pp. 217–222. Service et Musée cantonal d’archéologie (Archéologie neuchâteloise, 33), Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barham, L., 2002. Backed tools in Middle Pleistocene central Africa and their evolutionary ­significance. Journal of Human Evolution 43: 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. and Kuhn, S.L., 1999. The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution. American Anthropologist 101: 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfer-Cohen, A., 1995. Comment on “The Language Hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition: An Examination Based on a Multiregional Lithic Analysis” by M. Chazan. Current Anthropology 36: 758–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiseaubert, J.-L., 1982. Le Néolithique Moyen de la Saunerie Fouilles 1972–1975. Cahiers d’archéologie romande no. 23, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F.L., 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F.L., Slice, D.E., Gunz, P. and Mitteroecker, P., 2004. Anthropology takes control of morphometrics. Coll. Antropol. 28 (Suppl. 2), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F., 1961. Typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, J., Affolter, J. and Cattin, M.-I., 2006. L’industrie lithique. In Le site Magdalénien de Monruz, 1. Premiers elements pour l’analyse d’un habitat de plein air, edited by J. Bullinger, D. Leesch and N. Plumettaz, pp. 75–100. Service et Musée cantonal d’archéologie (Archéologie neuchâteloise, 33), Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, J., Leesch, D. and Plumettaz, N., 2006. Le site Magdalénien de Monruz, 1. Premiers elements pour l’analyse d’un habitat de plein air. Service et Musée cantonal d’archéologie (Archéologie neuchâteloise, 33), Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, A.M., 1994. Symboling and the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition: a theoretical and methodological critique. Current Anthropology 35: 369–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, P.G., 1991. Symbols and Palaeolithic artefacts: style, standardisation, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, M., 1995. The language hypothesis for the middle-to-upper paleolithic transition. Current Anthropology 36: 749–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commont, V., 1908. Les industries de l’ancien Saint-Acheul. L’Anthropologie 19: 527–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbey, R. and Roebroeks, W., 1995. Comment on “The Language Hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition” by M. Chazan. Current Anthropology 36: 759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, H.J., 1989. Late Pleistocene palaeoecology and archaeology in the southern Cape, South Africa. In The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, edited by P. Mellars and C. Stringer, pp. 547–564. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., 1967. Invitation to Archaeology. The American Museum of Natural History. The Natural History Press, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Errico, F., 2003. The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H., 1984. Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style, or sequence of reduction? Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H., 1989. The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Middle Paleolithic. In The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, edited by P. Mellars and C. Stringer, pp. 415–432. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, I.L. and Mardia, K.V., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, C.R., 1991. Procrustes methods and the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 53: 285–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C., 1975. Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychmetrika 40: 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves-Brown, P.M., 1995. Comment on “The Language Hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition” by M. Chazan. Current Anthropology 36: 759–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshilwood, C.S. and Marean, C., 2003. The origin of modern human behavior: critique of the models and their test implications. Current Anthropology 44: 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, R., 1969. Culture: A human domain. Current Anthropology 10: 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honegger, M., 2001. L’industrie lithique taillée du Néolithique moyen et final en Suisse. CRA Monographies 24. CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.G., 1995. Anatomy, behavior, and modern human origins. Journal of World Prehistory 9: 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.G., 2000. Archaeology and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 9: 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.G., 2008. Out of Africa and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 17: 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S.J., 2007. Is the Soanian techno-complex a Mode 1 or Mode 3 phenomenon? A morphometric assessment. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1434–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S.J., von Cramon-Taubadel, N. and Foley, R.A., 2006. A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysis of lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of application. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 847–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S. and von Cramon-Taubadel, N., 2008. Acheulean variability and hominin dispersals: a model-bound approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A.E., Hietala, H. and Williams, J.K., 2001. Tool standardization in the Middle and Upper Paleolithic: a closer look. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 11: 17–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBrearty, S., 2007. Down with the revolution. In Rethinking the Human Revolution, New Behavioural and biological Perspectives on the Origin and Dispersal of Modern Humans, edited by P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef and C. Stringer, pp. 133–152. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrearty, S. and Brooks, A., 2000. The revolution that wasn’t. A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution 39: 453–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, K.P., 2005. Permutation procd.sas, updated: 7 December, 2007. SAS for Geometric Morphometrics. Retrieved 20 December, 2008, from http://anthropologylabs.umn.edu/html/sas_for_geometric_morphometric.html.

  • McNulty, K., Frost, S. and Strait, D., 2006. Examining affinities of the Taung child by developmental simulation. Journal of Human Evolution 51: 274–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P., 1989a. Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology 30: 349–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P., 1989b. Technological changes at the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition: economic, social and cognitive perspectives. In The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, edited by P. Mellars and C. Stringer, pp. 338–365. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P., 1991. Cognitive changes and the emergence of modern humans in Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P., 1996. The Neanderthal Legacy: An Archaeological Perspective from Western Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P., 2007. Rethinking the human revolution: Eurasian and African perspectives. In Rethinking the Human Revolution, New Behavioural and biological Perspectives on the Origin and Dispersal of Modern Humans, edited by P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef and C. Stringer, pp. 1–14. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, G., 1995. Comment on “The Language Hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition” by M. Chazan. Current Anthropology 36: 761–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, G., 2006a. The Lower/Middle Paleolithic periodization in Western Europe: An evaluation. Current Anthropology 47: 709–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, G., 2006b. Testing retouched flake tool standardization during the Middle Paleolithic: patterns and implications. In Transitions Before the Transition: Evolution and Stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age, edited by E. Hovers and S.L. Kuhn, pp. 57–84. Kluwer Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, G., 2007. Middle Paleolithic Scraper morphology, flaking mechanics, and imposed form: revisiting Bisson’s ‘Interview with a Neanderthal’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17: 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, G. and McNulty, K., 2009, Morphometrics data from Paleolithic and Neolithic sites. http://www.anthropologylabs.umn.edu/eal/research/GillianeMonnier.php.

  • de Mortillet, G., 1883. Le Préhistorique: Antiquité de l’Homme. C. Reinwald, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, A. 2002. Coincidental factors of handaxe morphology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 413–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.J., 2006. TpsDig, v. 2.10. Ecology and Evolution Department, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, A. (ed.), 1982. The Transition from Lower to Middle Paleolithic and the Origin of Modern Humans (BAR International Series 151) BAR, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J., 1995. Comment on “The Language Hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition” by M. Chazan. Current Anthropology 36: 762–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets, H.D., 2003. IMP – Integrated Morphometrics Package. Dept. of Physics, Canisius College, 2001 Main St. Buffalo, NY 14208. http://www.canisius.edu/∼sheets/morphsoft.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl Gretsch, L.-I. and Detrey, J., 1999. Le Site Moustérien d’Alle, Pré Monsieur (Jura, Suisse). Office du patrimoine historique et Société jurassienne d’Emulation, Porrentruy. Cahier d’archéologie jurassienne 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B., 1996. A History of Archaeological Thought. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, P., 1995. Comment on “The Language Hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition” by M. Chazan. Current Anthropology 36: 764–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurz, S., 1999. The Howiesons Poort backed artefacts from Klasies River: An argument for ­symbolic behaviour. The South African Archaeological Bulletin 169: 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D., Sheets H.D. and Fink, W.L., 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephen Lycett and Parth Chauhan for having invited us to ­contribute this paper to the symposium’s proceedings, and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments. Additionally, G.F.M. would like to thank Béat Arnold, Archéologue cantonal de Neuchâtel; Marc-Antoine Kaiser, Director, Laténium; Matthieu Honegger, Professor, Université de Neuchâtel; and François Shifferdecker, Archéologue cantonal du Jura, for generously providing access to the archaeological materials as well as the Laténium’s library during the winter of 2007–2008. G.F.M. also thanks Marie-Isabelle Cattin, Denise Leesch, Laurence-Isaline Stahl Gretsch, Jean Detrey, and Gil Tostevin for many fruitful discussions; and Marlise and Robert Hatt for their generous logistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilliane F. Monnier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monnier, G.F., McNulty, K.P. (2010). Questioning the Link Between Stone Tool Standardization and Behavioral Modernity. In: Lycett, S., Chauhan, P. (eds) New Perspectives on Old Stones. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6861-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics