Skip to main content

Epidural and Regional Anesthesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Fundamentals of Pediatric Surgery
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

Children undergoing surgical procedures benefit from many improvements in pain management that have occurred over the past few decades. These enhancements are the result of changes in the attitudes of physicians, nurses, hospital administrators, and patients and their families, coupled with increased pressure from external regulatory agencies ­mandating the adequate assessment and effective treatment of pain in children. It can no longer be debated that infants and children have the capacity to feel pain, or that the experience of pain by a child potentially results in negative short- and long-term consequences. In fact, the evidence continues to mount that inadequately treated pain in children can result in harmful physiological and behavioral consequences and delay ­recovery from surgical procedures as measured by time required to return to a regular diet, activity, and hospital discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

General

  • Fitzgerals M, Howard R. The neurobiologic basis of pediatric pain. In: Schechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, editors. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2001. p. 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidow MS. Long-term effects of neonatal pain on nociceptive systems. Pain. 2002;99(3):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taddio A, Katz J, Ilevsick AL, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Lancet. 1997;349:599–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisman SJ, Bernstein B, Schechter NL. Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:147–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Epidural

  • Birmingham DK, Wheeler M, Suresh S, Dsida RM, Rae BR, Obrecht J, et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in children: can they do it? Anesth Analg. 2003;96(3):686–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krane EJ, Dalens BJ, Murat I, et al. The safety of epidurals placed during general anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier JF, Goujard E, Dubuousset AM, Samii K, Mazoit JX. Pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine after continuous epidural infusions in infants with and without biliary atresia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(1):87–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui BC, Wagner A, Cave D, Kearney R. Thoracic and lumbar epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using electrical stimulation guidance in pediatric patients: a review of 289 patients. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(3):683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Other Regional

  • Berde CB. Regional anesthesia in children: what have we learned? Anesth Analg. 1996;83(5):897–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darbure C, Pirot P, Raux O, Troncin R, Rochette A, Ricard C, et al. Perioperative continuous peripheral nerve blocks with disposable infusion pump in children: a prospective descriptive study. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(3):687–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadzik A, Vloka J. Neurologic complications of peripheral nerve block. In: Hadzik A, Vloka J, editors. New York School of Regional Anesthesia: peripheral nerve blocks: principles and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004. p. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(1):7–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjunan Ganesh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Summary Points

Inadequately treated pain in children who undergo surgical procedures can result in harmful physiological and behavioral sequelae can delays recovery from surgical procedures.

The use of an appropriate regional analgesic technique can minimize opiate consumption and reduce the incidence of opiate-related side effects.

Potential advantages of regional anesthesia/analgesia include superior site-specific analgesia, lowering of the stress response, reduced sedation, and improved patient and family satisfaction.

In children, regional analgesia is almost always used as an adjunct to general anesthesia.

In infants, the epidural space can be accessed via the sacral hiatus, which known as a “caudal block” and can be used to deliver a single dose of an analgesic or to place a catheter for infusion.

The epidural catheter needs to be positioned properly such that the affected dermatome is adequately blocked.

Complications of epidural analgesia include: inadequate analgesia due to incorrect positioning of the catheter, systemic effects of the narcotic or local anesthetic being administered, over-sedation, and, rarely, nerve root injury or epidural abscess.

Spinal anesthesia can be used in premature infants who are having a brief (<45 min) surgical procedure below the T10 dermatome as an alternative to general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

Regional blocks are used routinely for certain pediatric surgical procedures such as circumcision (penile block), inguinal hernia repair (ilio-inguinal block), and umbilical hernia repair (rectus sheath block) with good effect and excellent post-surgical analgesia.

Ultrasound can be used to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of some regional analgesic techniques.

Editor’s Comment

The vast majority of surgical procedures performed in children are performed under general anesthesia. Properly performed regional techniques, such as epidural analgesia and regional blocks, can very effective reduce the need for systemic narcotics, decrease the physiologic stress response, and ­provide lasting postoperative pain relief in these patients. The key ingredient, however, is accurate placement. This can be difficult to achieve, especially given that these procedures are technically demanding, therefore requiring a great deal of experience, and they are often placed when the child is already under general anesthesia, removing an element of feedback that is usually available when these are placed in adults. The use of ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guidance seems to have greatly increased the accuracy of some of these procedures and certainly should be used more frequently.

When used as part of a post-operative fast-track protocol, epidural catheters used for postoperative pain relief after major bowel surgery have been shown to reduce the postoperative ileus and shorten hospital stay, but only when they are placed in the thoracic region and when local anesthetics are infused instead of opioids. Children with lumbar epidural catheters not only can have a prolonged ileus, but they require an indwelling Foley catheter for urinary retention, and they sometimes complain of lower extremity numbness or weakness, which delays ambulation. In addition, the failure rate of epidural analgesia can be as high as 40%. When it does occurs, it can be very painful for the child and extremely frustrating for the parents, unless there is an aggressive and rapidly instituted back-up plan, which usually includes systemic therapy with intravenous narcotics and, if necessary, adjuvant anxiolytics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ganesh, A., Rose, J.B. (2011). Epidural and Regional Anesthesia. In: Mattei, P. (eds) Fundamentals of Pediatric Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6643-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6643-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6642-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6643-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics