Skip to main content

Reproductive ‘Choice’ and Egg Freezing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncofertility

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 156))

Abstract

As oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation techniques continue to improve [2, 3], there is a growing need to address the moral permissibility of what has been called ‘social’ egg freezing.1 Often used to preserve the fertility of cancer patients, egg freezing has recently gained popularity among women wishing to guard themselves against age-related infertility. Higher education, career advancement, an increased cost of living and difficulties finding a long-term partner are just some of the reasons why a number of women are having children at an older age [4, 5].

Of course some women, for various reasons, choose to embrace motherhood later than their own mothers. But many, like me, become older mothers because there was no other choice. It’s just how my life unfolded… . To suggest that most women are choosing to delay child-bearing is to suggest that women have an incredible level of control over their lives. In the real world this is just not true.

– Sushi Das [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter I shall use the term ‘egg freezing’ to refer to the initial and subsequent phases of fertility preservation methods for women. These include the initial removal and cryopreservation of oocytes, ovaries and ovarian tissue as well as the subsequent in vitro maturation of immature oocytes, in vitro fertilization and ovarian transposition.

  2. 2.

    Although, the phrase ‘delayed attempts at childbearing’ can describe a women’s attempt to conceive and have children at an older reproductive age, it should be noted the phrase is problematic because it can imply that women who have (or attempt to have) children when they are older do so ‘voluntarily’. As I will argue in this chapter, the ‘choice’ to delay childbearing may not be fully voluntary.

  3. 3.

    For example, bone marrow or stem cell transplantations, oophorectomy for cancer prophylaxis or benign conditions can threaten women’s fertility. Certain autoimmune and rheumatological conditions can also lead to infertility.

  4. 4.

    Karey Harwood describes social egg freezing as ‘insurance against age-related infertility’. My use of ‘age-related’ infertility thus picks up on Harwood’s description, but avoid the assumption that egg freezing is ‘insurance’ that guarantees successful pregnancies when frozen eggs are thawed and used in the future.

  5. 5.

    The ASRM defines experiments as ‘a procedure for the treatment of infertility is considered experimental until there is adequate scientific evidence of safety and efficacy from appropriately designed, peer-reviewed, published studies by different investigator groups’. Until there is ‘adequate peer-reviewed scientific evidence’, egg freezing will be considered an ‘experimental’ procedure regardless of improved rates of success in clinical trials and fertility clinics.

  6. 6.

    The success of egg freezing technology varies with respect to the specific procedure being offered (including the processes by which eggs are frozen and thawed, the method/site of re-implantation) and also the relevant features of the patient (such as age and health). Many people worry that because using egg freezing technology to reproduce is less certain than using ‘natural’ conception within the optimal reproductive age (20–35), women (and couples) risk being exploited by fertility clinics and risk developing ‘false hope’ concerning the procedure’s success.

  7. 7.

    Although the ASRM warns women that there is a risk to future offspring due to the effects of cryopreservation on meiotic spindle of the oocyte, there remain concerns regarding the potential for chromosomal aneuploidy or other karyotypic abnormalities in offspring; some studies have suggested that oocyte cryopreservation produces risks to offspring that are actually comparable to ‘natural’ conception. However, given the experimental nature of female fertility preservation techniques, the risks are largely unknown.

  8. 8.

    The use of the term menopause might be slightly misleading since female fertility begins to decline many years prior to the onset of menopause despite continued regular ovulatory cycles. Although there is no strict definition of advanced reproductive age in women, infertility becomes more pronounced after the age of 35.

References

  1. Das S. Delaying motherhood is all about Mr. Right. Age. February 8, 2008. Available at: http://www.theage.com.au/new/in-depth/delaying-motherhood-is-all-about-mr-right/2008/02/07/1202234063296.html. Accessed August 26, 2009.

  2. AbdelHafez F, Desai N, Ali M, Sayed E, Abu-Alhassan A, Bedaiwy M. Review: oocyte cryopreservation: a technical and clinical update. Expert Rev Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 4:443–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia G, Santos R, Arenas M, Gonzalez O, Ramirez P, Patrizio P. Comparative study of human oocyte cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90:S291–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Federal Government Source for Women’s Health Issues. 2009. Available at: http://www.womenshealth.gov/News/english/629915.htm. Accessed August 25, 2009.

  5. Simpson R. Delayed childbearing and childlessness. In: Kneale D, Coast E, Stillwell J, Eds. Fertility, living arrangements, care and mobility. Netherlands: Springer; 2009:23–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Aging and Infertility in Women. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86:S248–S52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davies MJ, deLacey SL, Norman RJ. Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: clarifying medical ambiguities to the benefit of all. Eur Soc Reprod Embryol. July 21, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harwood K. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics. 2009; 23:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90:S241–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Definition of ‘experimental’. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones B. Lord winston labels egg freezing an ‘expensive confidence trick’. BioNews. July 3, 2009. Available at: http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_46074.asp. Accessed July 6, 2009.

  12. Schermers J. No ‘wishful medicine’ please. NRC Handlesblad. July 16, 2009. Available at: http://www.nrc.nl/international/opinion/article2302404.ece. Accessed August 20, 2009.

  13. Fletcher W. Women warned not to freeze their eggs for social reasons. BioNews. February 9, 2009. Available at: http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_13662.asp. Accessed July 20, 2009.

  14. Meikle J. Women who delay babies until 30’s get health warning. Guardian. September 16, 2005. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/sep/16/health.healthandwellbeing. Accessed August 20, 2009.

  15. Goold I, Savulescu J. In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics. 2009; 23:47–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schover LR. Sexuality and fertility after cancer. New York: Wiley; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schover LR. Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. Med Paediatr Oncol. 1999; 33:53–39.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alper M, Proud Smith L, Sills E. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: current views on pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and management. J Exp Clin Assis Reprod. 2009; 6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin D. Women urged not to delay childbirth as scientists warn egg freezing is a ‘Huge gamble. Mail Online. February 1, 2009. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1133509/Women-urged-delay-childbirth-scientists-warn-egg-freezing-huge-gamble.html. Accessed August 20, 2009.

  20. Lan C, Xiao W, Xiaohui D, Hongling Y. Developmental competence and chromosomal aneuploidy of preimplantation embryos derived from rabbit oocytes grown in ovarian mesometrial grafts. Fertil Steril. 2009; 9:S1578–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18:769–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaw JM, Bowles J, Koopman P, Wood EC, Trounson AO. Fresh and cryopreserved ovarian tissue samples from donors with lymphoma transmit the cancer to graft recipients. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11:1668–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Practice Committee of the America Society of Reproductive Medicine. Essential elements of informed consent for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a Practice Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90:S134–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McLeod C, Sherwin S. Relational autonomy, self-trust and health care for patients who are oppressed. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, Eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:259–79.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baber KM, Dreyer AS. Gender-role orientations in older child-free and expectant couples. Sex Roles. 1986; 14:501–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranson G. Education, work and family decision making: finding the “right time” to have a baby. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol. 2009; 35:517–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nisker J, Baylis F, McLeod C. Choice in fertility preservation in girls and adolescent women with cancer. Cancer. 2006; 107(Suppl.):1686–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Joseph L. Rotman Institute of Science and Values for research assistance and a special thanks to Professor Carolyn McLeod for her helpful suggestions and ongoing support. This research was supported by the oncofertility consortium NIH 8UL1DE019587, 5RL1HD058296.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Petropanagos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petropanagos, A. (2010). Reproductive ‘Choice’ and Egg Freezing. In: Woodruff, T., Zoloth, L., Campo-Engelstein, L., Rodriguez, S. (eds) Oncofertility. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 156. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6517-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6518-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics