Skip to main content

The Transition to Sustainable Product Development and Manufacturing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3710 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 151))

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in sustainable product development and manufacturing and of the challenges in ubiquitous adoption of sustainable development practices in business. Environmental and business sustainability are examined in a holistic framework underscoring their interdependence on both spatial and temporal scales. We review the evolutionary rise in sustainability awareness including the development of methodologies for the assessment and development of sustainable products/manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References/Notes

  • According to World Watch Institute, Vital Signs Report, 2006–2007, pp.122: In 2004, nearly 1,800 transnational corporations or their affiliates filed corporate responsibility reports, up from virtually none in the early 1990s. While this reflects growing transparency and commitment to social and environmental principles, 97.5% of the nearly 70,000 TNCs worldwide still do not file such reports

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, van den Bergh JCJM, Gowdy JM (1998) View point: weak versus strong sustainability. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, # 98–103/3. Available online at: http://www.Tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/98103_OnlinePDF.pdf. Sept1998

  • Carlson RC, Rafinejad D (2010) Economic models for environmental and business sustainability in product development and manufacturing. Stanford University Paper, MS&E June19, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change (2007) The physical science basis, UNEP Report by The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    Google Scholar 

  • The Stern Review (2006) The economics of climate change. A UK Government Publication, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard business review on business & the environment. (1999) HBS Press Book, Product No. 2336; 17 December 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecosystem services include: air and water purification, water absorption and storage, sequestering and decomposition of wastes, regeneration of soil nutrients, pollination, seed, and nutrient dispersal, climate stabilization, etc. See Hassan R etal (eds) (2005) The millennium ecosystem assessment series & synthesis reports. Island; Available at the following link: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Condition.aspx#download

  • Manahan S (1999) Industrial ecology. CRC, BocaRaton

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel TE, Allenby BR (2003) Industrial ecology, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen DT, Behmanesh N (1994) Wastes as raw materials. In: Allenby BR, Richards DJ (eds) The greening of industrial ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, pp.69–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers RU, Ayers LW (1996) Industrial ecology: towards closing the materials cycle. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, (Chapter1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M etal (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of human economy. Proc Acad Sci 99(14):9266–9271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL (1997) Beyond greening, strategies for a sustainable world, HBR Jan–Feb 1997, Reprint No.97105

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow M (2000) The IPAT equation and its variants. J Ind Ecol 4(4):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Statistics Division– National Accounts, http://www.unstats.un.org

  • China Daily, 12 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • International Herald Tribune, 4 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian, 13 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wild Fund (WWF) http://www.worldwildlife.org

  • Shanghai Daily, 17–18 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC, 16 April 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters, 11 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL (2004) Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green, Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Billatos S, Basaly N (1997) Green technology and design for the environment. Taylor & Francis, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE (1995) How many people can the earth support. Norton, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1995) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1970) Motivation and personality, 2nd edn. Harper & Row, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Commerce. “Who killed the electric car?,” a film by Chris Paine, DVD by Sony Pictures Classics,2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. NY Times Magazine 33:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL, Leal DR (1997) Enviro-capitalists, doing good while doing well. Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb–Douglas production function, where output Y=AL αK β;L=labor input, K=capital input and A,α, and β are constants determined by technology (α+β=1 and α,β≥0). Also, the individual utility function is modeled a logarithmic function of his/her consumption (that is, the contribution of an individual to production is proportional to his/her consumption (Kempf H, Rossignol S (2007) Is inequality harmful for the environment in a growing economy? Econ Polit 19:53–71)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The following is a 2006 excerpt from Toyota–North America web site: “Our research continues to show that the majority of customers will not compromise performance for environmental benefits and are not inclined to pay a premium for an environmentally sensitive vehicle. However, with rising fuel prices, an increasing number of customers are considering the vehicle’s fuel economy as well as its price and performance, when they make purchase decisions. The onus is on the manufacturer to design and build environmental products with as few compromises as possible and sometimes in advance of market signals or regulatory requirements.”

    Google Scholar 

  • GE promotes an image of environmental leadership. “GE seeks leadership in environmental sustainability for shareholder value and not for charity”, said Jeff Immelt, the CEO in a 2006 interview with the Talk Show Host Charlie Rose. (b) BP undertakes a renewable energy ad campaign to overcome the negative public perception against oil companies. (c) Corporations communicate their triple-bottom-line programs to investors and customers in their annual sustainability reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind turbines marketed by GE for power generation. (b) IBM created a new market opportunity as an element of its Product End-of-Life Management (PELM) program. IBM’s service is called Asset Recovery Solution and targets commercial customers to manage their computers and workstations at end-of-life. A limited service is also provided to individual consumers through an “advance recycling fee” program. Asset Recovery Solution includes: data security management, disk overwrites, resale of products (remarketing), refurbish, and recycling service. In 2003, 69,000 metric tons were processed and 830,000 PCs were recycled, reused, or resold. (c)3M has developed biodegradable paint remover without methylene chloride and nonsolvent-based ink without volatile organic compounds

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2002/05/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003: on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances (RoHS) in electrical and electronic equipment

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday C, Schmidheiny S, Watts P (2002) Walking the talk: the business case for sustainable development. Brett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen O etal (2006) Eco-efficiency in extended supply chain: a case study of furniture production. J Environ Manag 79:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • For example, six or more packages are used in transporting and delivering tooth paste to a consumer, including: tooth paste plastic tube/plastic security seal wrap/paper box/plastic wrap for a dozen tubes/cardboard box/shippingcrate

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel TE, Allenby BR (1998) Design for environment. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny S, Business Council for Sustainable Development (1992) Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Efficiency means achievement of the intended performance with minimal utilization of resources

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC, April 16, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyota Motor Corporation: http://www.toyota.com/about/environment-2006

  • The Power Supply Design Guide is available on the web at: http://www.formfactors.org

  • Stanford MS&E 268 Course– There are four stages in the strategic role of manufacturing in support of a firm’s business success. These stages in increasingly degree of contribution are: internally neural, externally neutral, internally supportive, and externally supportive. In the latter stage, manufacturing is a significant contributor to the firm’s competitive advantage

    Google Scholar 

  • Jawahir IS (2007) Machining process and other case studies in sustainable manufacturing. University of Kentucky, Kentucky

    Google Scholar 

  • Klostermann J (ed) (1998) Product innovation and eco-efficiency. Academic, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers RU, Ayers LW (2002) A handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar,UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Applied Sustainability LLC, Business case for by-product synergy, Stanford, Prod No E118, 2–2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Morning Herald/Australia, Saturday, 23 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H etal (2000) Environmental assessment of products. Methodology, tools and case studies in product development, vol. 1. Springer, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall SR, Brown D (2003) The strategy of sustainability: a systems perspective on environmental initiatives. California Manage Rev 46(1) Reprint CMR 271, 10/1/03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrik W, Michael ZH, Alting L (2000) Environmental assessment of products. Methodology, tools and case studies in product development, vol. 1, 1st edn. Springer, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl P, Rubik F, Institute for Ecological Economy, Germany (2000) Life cycle assessment (LCA) in industry and business (Adoption Patterns, Applications & Implications)– in Germany, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, Springer, Hiedelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Billatos S, Basaly N, Tayler & Francis (1997) Green technology and design for the environment. University of Connecticut, Storrs,CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudice F, Rosa GL, Risitano A (2000) Product design for the environment. CRC, BocaRaton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Professor Feryal Erhun of the Management Science and Engineering Department at Stanford University for her valuable review comments that helped us improve the content and readability of thepaper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariush Rafinejad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlson, R.C., Rafinejad, D. (2011). The Transition to Sustainable Product Development and Manufacturing. In: Kempf, K., Keskinocak, P., Uzsoy, R. (eds) Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 151. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics