Skip to main content

The Incidence of US Farm Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency ((SIPE,volume 7))

Abstract

Many economists have argued that all farm subsidies are ultimately capitalized in land values. This chapter shows, both theoretically and empirically, that this is not so, although there is much room for disagreement as to the precise shares that accrue to landowners, farmers, and consumers. A review of econometric models in the literature, multimarket simulations, and the application of a sector model of US agriculture yields a range of results about the share of subsidy payments going to land. The truth probably lies in between the results from the static theoretical models with full adjustment and the general run of the econometric evidence. A significant share of even the so-called decoupled transfers goes to farmers rather than landowners, and both landowners and farm operators receive a significant share of the net benefits from subsidies. In an in-between case, based on 2005 market and policy conditions, for every dollar of government spending on farm subsidies, farmers receive about 50 cents, landlords receive about 25 cents, domestic and foreign consumers receive about 20 cents, and 5 cents is wasted. Additional amounts are wasted collecting the taxes to finance the spending and in administering the policies – perhaps another 20 cents.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, J.M. (2007), Benefits and Beneficiaries from U.S. Farm Subsidies. AEI Agricultural Policy Series: The 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond. American Enterprise Institute. Accessed May 2010. Available at http://aic.ucdavis.edu/research/farmbill07/aeibriefs/20070515_alstonSubsidiesfinal.pdf.

  • Alston, J.M., James, J.S. (2002), The incidence of agricultural policy, Chapter 33, In B.L. Gardner, G.C. Rausser (eds.), The Handbook on Agricultural Economics, Vol. II(a), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1869–1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassels, J.M. (1933), The nature of statistical supply curves, Journal of Farm Economics 15: 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, J.E. (1965), The effects of farm price supports on the returns to land and labor in agriculture, Journal of Political Economy 73: 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B.L. (2003), U.S. commodity policies and land values, Chapter 5, p. 81, In C.B. Moss, A. Schmitz (eds.), Government Policy and Farmland Markets: The Maintenance of Farmer Wealth, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B.L. (1987), The Economics of Agricultural Policies, Macmillan, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisser, M. (1993), Price support, acreage controls, and efficient redistribution, Journal of Political Economy 101: 584–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.K., Ortalo-Magné, F.N. (1992), The capitalization of wheat subsidies into agricultural land values, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 40: 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.K., Mishra, A.K., Ortalo-Magné, F.N. (2003a), Explaining regional differences in the capitalization of policy benefits into agricultural land values, Chapter 6, p. 97, In C.B. Moss, A. Schmitz (eds.), Government Policy and Farmland Markets: The Maintenance of Farmer Wealth, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.K., Mishra, A.K., Ortalo-Magné, F.N. (2003b), What’s wrong with our models of agricultural land values, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Prosch, A., Raymond, A. (2007), The Art of Leasing Negotiation in a Frenzied Environment, Cornhusker Economics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Extension. Accessed January http://www.agecon.unl.edu/Cornhuskereconomics/12-20-06.pdf.

  • Key, N., Lubowski, R.N., Roberts, M.J. (2005), Farm-level production effects from participation in government commodity programs: Did the 1996 federal agricultural improvement and reform act make a difference? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 1211–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B.E. (2005), The Incidence of U.S. Agricultural Subsidies on Farmland Rental Rates, Working Paper 05-04, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B.E. (2007), The Distribution of U.S. Agricultural Subsidies. AEI Agricultural Policy Series: The 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC. Accessed May 2010. Available at http://www.arec.umd.edu/people/faculty/Kirwan_Barrett/KirwanSubsidyDistribution5-07.pdf.

  • Lence, S.H., Mishra, A.K. (2003), The impacts of different farm programs on cash rents, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 753–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, D., Nair, R., Podbury, T., Sheldrick, B., Gunasakera, D., Fisher, B.S. (2006), U.S. Agriculture Without Farm Support. Research Report 06.10. ABARE (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics), Canberra (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M.J., Kirwan, B., Hopkins, J. (2003), The incidence of government program payments on agricultural land rents: The challenges of identification, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosine, J., Helmberger, P.G. (1974), A neoclassical analysis of the U.S. farm sector, 1948–1970, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56: 717–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaik, S., Helmers, G.A., Atwood, J.A. (2005), The evolution of farm programs and their contribution to agricultural land values, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 1190–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrick, B.J., Barry, P.J. (2003), Farmland markets: Historical perspectives and contemporary issues, Chapter 3, p. 27, In C.B. Moss, A. Schmitz (eds.), Government Policy and Farmland Markets: The Maintenance of Farmer Wealth, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, D.A. (2003), Implications of the USA farm bill of 2002 for agricultural trade and trade negotiations, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47: 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, D.A. (2005a), Boxed in: Conflicts between U.S. farm policies and WTO obligations, Cato Institute Trade Policy Analysis 32(December). Accessed May 2010. Available at http://www.cato.org/pubs/tpa/tpa-032.pdf.

  • Sumner, D.A. (2005b), Production and trade effects of farm subsidies: Discussion, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 1229–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchtman, D.L. (2006), Is Your Lease Compatible with Your Division of USDA Farm Program Payments Between Landlord and Tenant? Agricultural Law and Taxation Briefs, Vol. 6(1, May 30). Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL. Accessed January 2007 http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/legal/articles/ALTBs/ALTB_06-01/ALTB_06-01.pdf.

  • USDA, ERS (U. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service). Various Years. U.S. and State Farm Income Data Farm Cash Receipts, 1924–2004. Accessed January 2007. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FarmIncome/finfidmu.htm.

  • Weersink, A., Clark, S., Turvey, C., Sarkar, R. (1999), The effect of agricultural policy on farmland values, Land Economics 75(3): 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is drawn from work undertaken in the context of the American Enterprise Institute project, led by Bruce Gardner and Daniel Sumner, The 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond (http://aic.ucdavis.edu/research/farmbill07/aeibriefs/20070515_alstonSubsidiesfinal.pdf), as reported in my AEI paper (Alston, 2007), on which I was assisted by Matt Andersen, Henrich Brunke, Antoine Champetier de Ribes, Conner Mullally, and Sebastien Pouliot.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian M. Alston .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5.5 Program payments versus cash rents in crop year 2005, by state

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alston, J.M. (2010). The Incidence of US Farm Programs. In: Ball, V., Fanfani, R., Gutierrez, L. (eds) The Economic Impact of Public Support to Agriculture. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6385-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics