Abstract
We estimated standard and Bayesian random coefficient models (RCMs) to examine the risk attitudes of US corn–soybean farmers by revenue class using national survey data covering the 2000–2006 growing seasons. Attitudes toward risk are shown to depend on revenue class, with the magnitude of the effect being relatively small. The hypothesis of risk-neutral preferences is not rejected for small- or medium-revenue farmers but is rejected, in favor of a very slight level of risk tolerance, for large- and very large-revenue farmers and for the entire sample of farmer types. The hypothesis of downside risk neutrality is not rejected for small-revenue farmers but is rejected, in favor of a very slight level of downside risk aversion, for medium-, large-, and very large-revenue farmers. Although risk neutrality is rejected for the entire sample of farmer types, the magnitudes of our estimates of the coefficients of absolute risk aversion and absolute downside risk aversion are extremely small. This suggests that the frequent assumption of risk-neutral preferences adopted in the agricultural economics literature is justifiable for the case of US corn–soybean farmers during 2000–2006.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Antle, J. (1983), Testing the stochastic structure of production: A flexible moment-based approach, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 1(3): 192–201.
Antle, J. (1987), Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(3): 509–522.
Antle, J. (1989), Nonstructural risk attitude estimation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(3): 774–784.
Arrow, K. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing, Yrjö Johnssonin Säätiö, Helsinki.
Chavas, J. (2004), Risk Analysis in Theory and Practice, Elsevier, San Diego, CA.
Chavas, J., Holt, M. (1996), Economic behavior under uncertainty: A joint analysis of risk preferences and technology, Review of Economics and Statistics 78(2): 329–335.
Gardebroek, C. (2006), Comparing risk attitudes of organic and non-organic farmers with a Bayesian random coefficient model, European Review of Agricultural Economics 33(4): 485–510.
Just, R., Pope, R. (1979), On the relationship of input decisions and risk, In J. Roumasset, J.-M. Boussard, I. Singh (eds.), Risk, Uncertainty and Agricultural Development, Agricultural Development Council, New York, NY, 177–197.
Just, R., Pope, R. (2002), A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in U.S. Agriculture, Kluwer, Norwell.
Koop, G. (2003), Bayesian Econometrics, Wiley, Chichester.
Pennings, J., Smidts, A. (2000), Assessing the construct validity of risk attitude, Management Science, 46(10), 1337–1348.
Pratt, J. (1964), Risk aversion in the small and in the large, Econometrica 32(1–2): 122–136.
Roumasset, J., Boussard, J.-M., Singh, I., eds. (1979), Risk, Uncertainty and Agricultural Development, Agricultural Development Council, New York, NY.
Swamy, P. (1970), Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model, Econometrica 38(2): 311–323.
Swamy, P. (1971), Statistics Inference in Random Coefficient Regression Models, Springer, New York, NY.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). (1996–2007), Agricultural Prices Summary, USDA-NASS, Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). (2005), Agricultural Statistics 2005, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Disclaimer: The views and findings reported in this chapter are solely those of the author(s). They do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or other findings of the USDA. The chapter was not reviewed or approved by any agency of the USDA.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Livingston, M., Erickson, K., Mishra, A. (2010). Standard and Bayesian Random Coefficient Model Estimation of US Corn–Soybean Farmer Risk Attitudes. In: Ball, V., Fanfani, R., Gutierrez, L. (eds) The Economic Impact of Public Support to Agriculture. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6385-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6385-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6384-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6385-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)