Skip to main content

Activity Systems Analysis and Its Value

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Activity Systems Analysis Methods

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to highlight the benefits that activity systems analysis brings to studies involving complex learning environments. In this chapter, I will address these questions: What is activity systems analysis? What is the added value that activity systems analysis brings to qualitative research? Who studies complex learning environments with activity systems analysis? By the end of the chapter, readers will be able to identify the benefits activity systems analysis could bring to their future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76. doi: 10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Schatz, S., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 25–47. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1101_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural–historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy. Retrieved November 30, 2009, from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik, 16(3), 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999b). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1–2), 63–93. doi: 10.1023/A:1008648532192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974. doi: 10.1080/001401300409143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203–212. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marken, J. A. (2006). An application of activity theory: A case of global training. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(2), 27–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.2006.tb00364.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwanza, D. (2002a). Conceptualising work activity for CAL systems design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 84–92. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00214.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwanza, D. (2002b). Towards an activity-oriented design method for HCI research and practice. The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human–computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (2005). Objects of desire: Power and passion in collaborative activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 37–51. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. (1997). A sociocultural approach to the study of mind. In E. Toback, R. J. Flamagne, M. B. Parlee, L. M. W. Martin, & A. S. Kapelman (Eds.), Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner (pp. 266–280). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V., Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2003a). How a technology professional development program fit into the work lives of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 591–607. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00056-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2003b). Using activity theory as an analytical lens for examining technology professional development in schools. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(2), 100–119. doi: 10.1207/S1532-7884MCA1002_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2007). Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design-based research from a Cultural–Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) framework. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 451–484. doi: 10.1080/10508400701524777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Smaldino, S. (2007). Using activity theory to evaluate and improve K-12 school and university partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(4), 364–380. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2010). Activity Systems Analysis and Its Value. In: Activity Systems Analysis Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics