Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis pp 315–361Cite as

Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance

Modeling Considerations and Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 164))

Abstract

The banking industry has been the object of DEA analyses by a significant number of researchers and probably is the most heavily studied of all business sectors. Various DEA models have been applied in performance assessing problems, and the banks’ complex production processes have further motivated the development and improvement of DEA techniques. The main application areas for DEA in bank and branch performance analysis include the following: efficiency ranking; resource allocation, efficiency trends investigation; environmental impacts compensation; examining the impacts of new technology, ownership, deregulation, corporate, economic, and political events, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler N, Golany B. Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 2002;53:985–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwall V. 1996, Performance Analysis of Large Canadian Banks over Time using DEA, MASc Dissertation, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Faraj TN, Alidi AS, Bu-Bshait KA. Evaluation of bank branches by means of data envelopment analysis. Int J Oper Prod Man. 1993;13(9):45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Muharrami S. The causes of productivity change in GCC banking industry. Int J Prod Perform Manag. 2007;56:731–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sharkas AA, Hassan MK, Lawrence S. The impact of mergers and acquisitions on the efficiency of the US banking industry: further evidence. J Bus Finance Account. 2008;35:50–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen P, Petersen NC. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci. 1993;39:1261–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Paradi JC, Aggarwall V, Schaffnit C. Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. J Prod Anal. 2004;21:67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Tam F. Estimating global frontier shifts and global Malmquist indices. J Prod Anal. 2007;27:137–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos AD. Service quality and operating efficiency synergies for management in the provision of financial services: evidence from Greek bank branches. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:300–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos AD. Non-parametric frontier models for assessing the market and cost efficiency of large-scale bank branch networks. J Money Credit Bank. 1998;30(2):172–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos AD. An optimization framework of the triad: service capabilities, customer satisfaction and performance. In: Harker PT, Zenios SA, editors. Performance of financial institutions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 312–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK. The evidence on efficiency gains: the role of mergers and the benefits to the public. J Bank Finance. 1999;23:991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK. Productivity Analysis in the Services Sector with Data Envelopment Analysis, 3rd ed., University of Queensland Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK. Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: an illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. Omega. 2009;37:535–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Morey R. The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1986;32(12):1613–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PW. Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers. J Econometrics. 1990;46:39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PW, Berger AN, Ferrier GD, Humphrey DB. Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: a comparison of frontier efficiency methods. J Econ Bus. 1998;50:85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg SA, Førsund FR, Jansen ES. Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980–1989. Scand J Econ (Suppl). 1992;94:211–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergendahl G, Lindblom T. Evaluating the performance of Swedish savings banks according to service efficiency. Eur J Oper Res. 2008;185:1663–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, DeYoung R. Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. J Bank Finance. 1997;21:849–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Humphrey DB. 1990, Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, Working Paper #151, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Humphrey DB. Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN. The efficiency effects of bank mergers and acquisitions: a preliminary look at the 1990s data. In: Amihud Y, Miller G, editors. Bank mergers and acquisitions. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1998. p. 79–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya A, Lovell CAK, Sahay P. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:333–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho AS, Dyson RG. Efficiency, size, benchmarks and targets for bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 1999;50:903–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canbas S, Cabuk A, Kilic SB. Prediction of commercial bank failure via multivariate statistical analysis of financial structures: The Turkish case. Eur J Oper Res. 2005;166:528–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu B, Molyneux P. A comparative study of efficiency in European banking. Appl Econ. 2003;35:1865–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica. 1982;50:1393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazals C, Florens JP, Simar L. Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. J Econometrics. 2002;106:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T, Rao DSP, Battese GE. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RJ, Davis EP. 1992, Output and Productivity in Banking, Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Hababou M, Tuenter HJ. Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. J Prod Anal. 2000;14:209–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Seiford LM, Zhu J. Models for performance benchmarking: measuring the effect of e-business activities on banking performance. Omega. 2004;32:313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references, and DEA-solver software. New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Ghosh S. Financial deregulation and efficiency: an empirical analysis of Indian banks during the post reform period. Rev Financ Econ. 2006;15:193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delis MD, Papanikolaou NI. Determinants of bank efficiency: evidence from a semi-parametric methodology. Manag Finance. 2009;35:260–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deville A. Branch banking network assessment using DEA: a benchmarking analysis – a note. Manag Acc Res. 2009;20:252–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung R. 1993, Determinants of Cost Efficiencies in Bank Mergers, Economic and Policy Analysis, Working Paper 93–01, Washington: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake L, Hall MJB. Efficiency in Japanese banking: an empirical analysis. J Bank Finance. 2003;27:891–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake L, Howcroft B. Relative efficiency in the branch network of a UK bank: an empirical study. Omega. 1994;22(1):83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake L, Hall MJB, Simper R. The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: a non-parametric analysis of Hong Kong’s banking system. J Bank Finance. 2006;30:1443–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favero C, Papi L. Technical efficiency and scale efficiency in the Italian banking sector: a non-parametric approach. Appl Econ. 1995;27:385–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev. 1994;84:66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S. Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. Am J Agric Econ. 2003;85:1070–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier GD, Lovell CAK. Measuring cost efficiency in banking: econometric and linear programming evidence. J Econometrics. 1990;46:229–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fethi MD, Pasiouras F. Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: a survey. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;204:189–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixler D, Zieschang K. 1999, The Productivity of the Banking Sector: Integrating Financial and Production Approaches to Measuring Financial Service Output, Canadian Journal of Economics, 32, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florens JP, Simar L. Parametric approximations of nonparametric frontiers. J Econometrics. 2005;124:91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox KJ, Hill RJ, Diewert WE. Identifying outliers in multi-output models. J Prod Anal. 2004;22:73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei FX, Harker PT. Measuring aggregate process performance using AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 1999;116:436–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Weber WL. Japanese banking inefficiency and shadow pricing. Math Comput Model. 2008;48:1854–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giokas D. Bank branch operating efficiency: a comparative application of DEA and the log-linear model. Omega. 1991;19(6):549–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany B, Storbeck JE. A data envelopment analysis of the operation efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces. 1999;29(3):14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski R, Mathur I, Rangan N. The role of takeovers in increasing efficiency. Manag Decis Econ. 1995;16(3):211–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauner D. Explaining efficiency differences among large German and Austrian banks. Appl Econ. 2005;37:969–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrylchyk O. Consolidation of the Polish banking sector: consequences for the banking institutions and the public. Econ Syst. 2004;28:125–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes M, Thompson S. The productivity effects of bank mergers: evidence from the UK building societies. J Bank Finance. 1999;23:825–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho CT, Wu YS. Benchmarking performance indicators for banks. Benchmarking Int J. 2006;13:147–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonsky J, Fiala P, Smirlis Y, Despotis DK. DEA with interval data: an illustration using the evaluation of branches of a Czech bank. CEJOR. 2004;12:323–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins L, Anderson M. Multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2003;147:51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor J, Maital S. Measuring efficiency by product group: integrating DEA with activity-based accounting in a large Mideast bank. Interfaces. 1999;29(3):27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CS, Davidson LF. The effects of IT expenditures on banks’ business performance: using a balanced scorecard approach. Manag Finance. 2004;30:28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella RP. The measurement of bank output. J Inst Bankers Ireland. 1980;82:173–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Tone K. A multistage method to measure efficiency and its application to Japanese banking industry. Soc Econ Plann Sci. 2008;42:75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ST. Measuring and categorizing technical efficiency and productivity change of commercial banks in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37:2783–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell CAK, Pastor JT. Target setting: an application to a bank branch network. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:290–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Vivas A, Pastor JT, Pastor JM. An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. J Prod Anal. 2002;18:59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist S. Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estatistica. 1953;4:209–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEachern D, Paradi JC. Intra- and inter-country bank branch assessment using DEA. J Prod Anal. 2007;27:123–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee K, Ray SC, Miller SM. Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: the initial post-deregulation experience. J Bank Finance. 2001;25:913–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash D, Sterna-Karwat A. An application of DEA to measure branch cross selling efficiency. Comput Oper Res. 1996;23(4):385–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira C, Tabak B. An international comparison of banking sectors: a DEA approach. Global Econ Rev. 2005;34:291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oral M, Kettani O, Yolalan R. 1992, An Empirical Study on Analyzing the Productivity of Bank Branches, IIE Transactions 24 No 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oral M, Yolalan R. An empirical study on measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank branches. Eur J Oper Res. 1990;46:282–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradi JC, Schaffnit C. Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a Canadian bank – a DEA application. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;156:719–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradi JC, Zhu H, Edelstein B. 2009, Identifying management groups in a large Canadian bank branch network with DEA approach, XI European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Pisa, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradi J, Vela S, Zhu H. Adjusting for cultural differences, a new DEA model applied to a merged bank. J Prod Anal. 2010a;33:109–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradi JC, Rouatt S, Zhu H. 2010b, Two-Stage Evaluation of Bank Branch Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Accepted for publication in Omega International Journal of Management Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkan C. Measuring the efficiency of service operations: an application to bank branches. Eng Costs Prod Econ. 1987;12:237–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasiouras F. International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis. Rev Quant Finance Acc. 2008;30:187–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J, Perez F, Quesada J. Efficiency analysis in banking firms: an international comparison. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peristiani S. 1993, Evaluating The Postmerger X-Efficiency and Scale Efficiency of US Banks, Federal Reserve Bank Of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peristiani S. Do mergers improve the X-efficiency and scale efficiency of US banks? Evidence from the 1980s. J Money Credit Bank. 1997;29(3):326–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS, Thanassoulis E. Comparative efficiency analysis of Portuguese bank branches. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;177:1275–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray SD. Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resti A. Evaluating the cost-efficiency of the Italian banking system: what can be learned from the joint application of parametric and non-parametric techniques. J Bank Finance. 1997;21:221–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resti A. Regulation can foster mergers, can mergers foster efficiency? The Italian case. J Econ Bus. 1998;50:157–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero J. Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;111:461–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathye M. Measuring productivity changes in Australian banking: an application of Malmquist indices. Manag Finance. 2002;28:48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffnit C, Rosen D, Paradi JC. Best practice analysis of bank branches: an application of DEA in a large Canadian bank. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98(2):269–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seçme NY, Bayrakdaroğlu A, Kahraman C. Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36:11699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Manage Sci. 1999;45:1270–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman HD, Ladino G. Managing bank productivity using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Interfaces. 1995;25(2):60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman HD, Gold F. Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis. J Bank Finance. 1985;9(2):297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman HD, Rupert TJ. Do bank mergers have hidden or foregone value? Realized and unrealized operating synergies in one bank merger. Euro J Oper Res. 2006;168:253–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman HD, Zhu J. Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: Evidence from a US bank application. Ann Oper Res. 2006;145:301–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L. Detecting outliers in frontier model: a simple approach. J Prod Anal. 2003;20:391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P. Data envelopment analysis applied to financial statements. Omega Int J Manage Sci. 1990;18(2):131–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soteriou AC, Stavrinides Y. An internal customer service quality data envelopment analysis model for bank branches. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 1997;17(8):780–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soteriou A, Zenios SA. Operations, quality, and profitability in the provision of banking services. Manage Sci. 1999;45(9):1221–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soteriou AC, Stavrinides Y. An internal customer service quality data envelopment analysis model for bank branches. Int J Bank Mark. 2000;18:246–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowlati T, Paradi JC. Establishing the “practical frontier” in data envelopment analysis. Omega. 2004;32:261–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton KR. Trends in relationship lending and factors affecting relationship lending efficiency. J Bank Finance. 2002;26:127–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavárek D. Banking efficiency in the context of European integration. East Eur Econ. 2006;44:5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sufian F, Majid MZA. Bank mergers performance and the determinations of Singaporean banks’ efficiency: an application of two-stage banking models. Gadjah Mada Int J Bus. 2007;9:19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RG, Brinkmann EJ, Dharmapala PS, Gonzales-Lima MD, Thrall RM. DEA/AR profit ratios and sensitivity of 100 large US banks. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:213–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoraneenitiyan N, Avkiran NK. Measuring the impact of restructuring and country-specific factors on the efficiency of post-crisis East Asian banking systems: integrating DEA with SFA. Socio Econ Plann Sci. 2009;43:240–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa-Ausina E. Exploring efficiency differences over time in the Spanish banking industry. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;139:643–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa-Ausina E, Grifell-Tatje E, Armero C, Conesa D. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency and Malmquist productivity indices: an application to Spanish savings banks. Eur J Oper Res. 2008;184:1062–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens H. On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts and urban transit. J Prod Anal. 1993;4(1/2):183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance H. 2000, Opportunity Index Development for Bank Branch Networks, MASc Dissertation, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vennet R. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the efficiency and profitability of EC credit institutions. J Bank Finance. 1996;20:1531–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassiloglou M, Giokas D. A study of the relative efficiency of bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 1990;41(7):591–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela S. 2002, Measuring Effects Of Cultural Differences In Bank Branch Performance And Implications To The Branch Integration Process In Bank Mergers, Ph.D. Thesis, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb RM. Levels of efficiency in UK retail banks: A DEA window analysis. Int J Econ Bus. 2003;10:305–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill L. Measuring cost efficiency in European banking: a comparison of frontier techniques. J Prod Anal. 2004;21:133–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S. Bank mergers and acquisitions – an evaluation of the ‘four pillars’ policy in Australia. Aust Econ Pap. 2008;47:141–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu HY, Tzeng GH, Chen YH. A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on balanced scorecard. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36:10135–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Paradi JC. 2006, Cross Firm Bank Branch Benchmarking Using “Handicapped” Data Envelopment Analysis to Adjust for Corporate Strategic Effects, System Sciences, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference 2, 34b–34b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavas BF, Fisher DM. Performance evaluation of commercial bank branches using data envelopment analysis. J Bus Manage. 2005;11:89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenios CV, Zenios SA, Agathocleous K, Soteriou AC. Benchmarks of the efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces. 1999;29(3):37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis C, Despotis DK, Stavropoulou E. Multiattribute evaluation of Greek banking performance. Appl Stoch Models Data Anal. 1995;11:97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Farvolden for proofreading the chapter and the former graduate students in the CMTE who had offered the results of some of their work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3E5

    Joseph C. Paradi

  2. School of Information Technology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Zijiang Yang

  3. Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Haiyan Zhu

Authors
  1. Joseph C. Paradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zijiang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haiyan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph C. Paradi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. McCombs School of Business, Dept. Management Science &, University of Texas, Austin, University Station 1, Austin, 78712-0212, Texas, USA

    William W. Cooper

  2. Dept. Industrial and, Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Beal Avenue 1205, Ann Arbor, 48109-2117, Michigan, USA

    Lawrence M. Seiford

  3. Dept. Management, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Institute Road 100, Worcester, 01609, Massachusetts, USA

    Joe Zhu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paradi, J.C., Yang, Z., Zhu, H. (2011). Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance. In: Cooper, W., Seiford, L., Zhu, J. (eds) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 164. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation