Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Packaging and the Supply Chain: A Look at Transportation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Green Manufacturing

  • 3379 Accesses

Abstract

In the interest of sustainability, many manufacturers have taken steps to analyze the key components of their products and processes across the span of their supply chain. Product packaging—which is an especially pervasive component, spanning across the supply chain of nearly all products—has garnered particular interest in discussions of sustainability. Packaging is not only associated with its own sourcing impacts but also influences the impacts of the product, especially in terms of the shipping impacts of the product. Several organizations have developed tools and guidelines to help manufacturers make greener packaging choices in terms of packaging. Pallet utilization is one practice for improving packaging that has been put forth in these publications and is one of the few practices that consider the impacts of packaging, not only in the context of its own supply chain but also as a component of a product. This study discusses the practice of pallet utilization and identifies the cases in which it would serve as potentially beneficial. These considerations are currently lacking in the recommendations for the adoption of pallet utilization. In addition, an overview of the current methodologies used to evaluate the environmental impacts of transportation and to optimize the distribution of the product is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hekkert MP, Joosten LAJ, Worrell E (2000) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rokka J, Uusitalo L (2008) Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices—do consumers care? Int J Consum Stud 32:516–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brachfeld D, Dritz T, Kodama S, Phipps A, Steiner E, Keoleian G (2001) Life cycle assessment of the Stonyfield Farm product delivery system. Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  4. Verghese K, Lewis H (2007) Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: a supply chain approach. Int J Prod Res 45(18):4381

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler NB (2007) What’s in store for plastic bags. Resour Recycl 26(6):15–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stafford B (2007) China and forest trade in the Asia-Pacific region: implications for forests and livelihoods. Environmental Aspects of China’s Papermaking Fiber Supply. Prepared for Forest Trends. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_521.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  7. USGS (2009) Minerals yearbook 2008. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  8. WRAP (2009b) The Chinese markets for recovered paper and plastics. Market situation report—Spring 2009. http://www.wrap.org.uk/downloads/China_MSR.95cc7faa.6971.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  9. American Chemistry Council (2010) The resin review. The annual statistical report for the North American plastics industry, 2010th edn. American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ekvall T (2000) A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(1–2):91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frichknecht R (2000) Allocation in life cycle inventory analysis for joint production. Int J LCA 5:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle Assessment. Part I: goals and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayagh S, Ventura A, Hoang T, François D, Jullien A (2010) Sensitivity of the LCA allocation procedure for BFS recycled into pavement structures. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(6):348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider F (1994) Allocation and recycling: enlarging to the cascade system. Proceedings of the European Workshop on Allocation in LCA, Leiden, pp 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weidema BP (2001) Avoiding co-product allocation in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huppes G, Schneider F (1994) Proceedings of the European workshop on Allocation in LCA. Centre of Environmental Science of Leiden University CML, Leiden, 24–25 February

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huppes G (1994) A general method for allocation in LCA. In: Huppes G, Schneider F (eds) Proceedings of the European workshop. Center for Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making. scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. Ph.D. diss., Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Zürich, ESU-services

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bakshi BR, Gutowski TG, Sekulic DP (2011) Thermodynamics and the destruction of resources. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholson A (2009) Methods for managing uncertainty in material selection decisions: robustness of early stage life cycle assessment. MS Tthesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frischknecht R (2007) LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency. recovery of materials and energy for resource efficiency. World Congress, Davos, Switzerland, 3–5 September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore Recycling Associates Inc (2008) 2006 national post-consumer recycled plastic bag and film report. Prepared for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moore Recycling Associates Inc (2009) 2007 national post-consumer recycled plastic bag and film report. Prepared for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moore Recycling Associates Inc (2010) 2008 national post-consumer recycled plastic bag and film report. Prepared for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koltun P, Tharumarajah A, Ramakrishnan S (2005) An approach to treatment of recycling in LCA study. The fourth Australian LCA Conference, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gustafsson K, Jonson G, Smith DLG, Sparks, L (2006) Retailing logistics and fresh food packaging; managing change in the supply chain, London Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lilienfeld R (2007) Review of life cycle data relating to disposable, compostable biodegradable, and reusable grocery bags. The ULS report. http://use-less-stuff.com/Paper-and-Plastic-Grocery-Bag-LCA-Summary.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  28. Zhang T, Reich-Weiser C, Nelson J, Farschi R, Minassians AD, Dornfeld D, Horne S (2008) Calculating a realistic energy payback time for a solfocus concentrator pv system. Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability, UC Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pa A, Craven J, Bi XT, Melin S, Sokhansanj S (2009) Evaluations of domestic applications of british columbia wood pellets based on life cycle analysis. life cycle assessment IX: toward the global life cycle economy, Boston, 29 September to 2 October

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weber C, Matthews HS (2008) Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. J Environ Sci Technol 42(10):3508–3513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Light-duty automotive technology and fuel economy trends: 1975 through 2006. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  32. EIA (2008) Annual Energy Outlook 2008 with Projections to 2030. US Department of Energy

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bomberg MS, Kockelman KM, Thompson MR (2008) Greenhouse gas emission control options: assessing transportation and electricity generation technologies and policies to stabilize climate change. Presented at 88th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frey HC, Kuo PY (2007) Best practices guidebook for greenhouse gas reductions in freight transportation. North Carolina State University. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~frey/reports/Frey_Kuo_071004.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  35. Davies J, Facanha C, Aamidor J (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions from US freight sources: using activity data to interpret trends and reduce uncertainty. Proceedings of the 87th annual meeting of the transportation research board

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reich-Weiser C, Dornfeld DA (2009) A discussion of greenhouse gas emission tradeoffs and water scarcity within the supply chain. J Manuf Syst 28(1):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Facanha C (2006) Life-cycle air emissions inventory of freight transportation in the United States. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spielmann M, Scholz RW (2004) Life cycle inventories of transport services: background data for freight transport. Int J LCA 10(1):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. World Resources Institute (2008) GHG protocol tool for mobile combustion. Version 2.2. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  40. Fernie J, McKinnon AC (2009) The development of E-tail logistics. In: Fernie J, Sparks L (eds) Retail management and logistics, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Matthews HS, Williams E, Tagami T, Hendrickson C (2002) Energy implications of online book retailing in the United States and Japan. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:493–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams E, Tagami T (2003) Energy use in sales and distribution via E-commerce and conventional retail. J Ind Ecol 6(2):99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. "DEFRA (2005a) Guidelines for company reporting on greenhouse gas emissions annexes. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, July. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/reporting/pdf/envrpgas-annexes.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2011

  44. US Department of Energy (2004) US energy intensity indicators: transportation sector. energy efficiency and renewable energy. http://intensityindicators.pnl.gov/trend_data.stm. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  45. Facanha C, Horvath A (2007) Evaluation of life cycle air emission factors of freight transportation. J Environ Sci Technol 41:7138–7144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McKinnon AC (2007) CO2 emissions from freight transport in the UK. Commission for Integrated Transport, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute (2009) GHG emissions from transport or mobile sources. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/downloads/calcs/WRI_Transport_Tool.xls. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  48. Helms H, Lambrecht U (2007) The potential contribution of light-weighting to reduce transport energy consumption. Int J LCA 12(1):58–64

    Google Scholar 

  49. Büttner A, Heyn J (1999) Umwelt- und Kostenbilanz im Fahrzeugrohbau: Aluminium, Stahl und Edelstahl. VDI Berichte 1488. VDI, Düsseldorf, pp 137–152

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pearce JM, Johnson SJ, Grant GB (2007) 3D-mapping optimization of embodied energy of transportation. Resour Conserv Recycl 51:435–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cummins Engine Company (2006) Secrets of better fuel economy, the physics of MPG. http://cumminsengines.com/assets/pdf/Secrets%20of%20Better%20Fuel%20Economy_whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  52. McKinnon AC, Edwards JB (2009) The greening of retail logistics. In: Fernie J, Sparks L (eds) Retail management and logistics, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  53. McKinnon AC (2008) The potential of economic incentives to reduce CO2 emissions from goods transport. Paper prepared for the first International Transport Forum on Transport and Energy: the Challenge of Climate Change, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  54. Europen (2009) The European shopping baskets, packaging trends for fast-moving consumer goods in selected European countries. Part 1: first data collection. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  55. Envirowise (2002) Packaging design for the environment: reducing costs and quantities. GG360R. Harwel International Business Centre, Didcot, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  56. WRAP (2009a) A guide to evolving packaging design. www.wrap.org.uk/retail/the_guide_to_evolving_packaging_design. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  57. INCPEN (2003) Responsible packaging—code of practice for optimising packaging and minimising packaging waste. The Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  58. Envirowise, Incpen (2008) Packguide: a guide to packaging eco-design. http://www.incpen.org/docs/PackGuide.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  59. Kraft Foods (2010) Kraft foods starts new year 150 million pounds lighter: sustainable packaging design, sourcing and partnerships remove weight equivalent of more than 150 fully loaded jumbo jets from supply chain. http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/mediacenter/country-press-releases/us/2010/multi_media_01262010.aspx. Accessed 25 Sept 2011

  60. Casey L (2009) Kraft redesigns crystal light packaging for better shelf appeal and sustainability. packaging digest. http://www.packagingdigest.com/article/367382-Kraft_redesigns_Crystal_Light_packaging_for_better_shelf_appeal_and_sustainability.php. Accessed 25 Sept 2011

  61. Rosenbloom (2008) Solution, or mess? A milk jug for a green earth. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/30/business/30milk.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  62. Twede D, Clarke RH, Tait JA (2000) Packaging postponement: a global packaging strategy. Packag Technol Sci 13(3):105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sterling S (2007) Transportation: driving sustainable results. Packaging World, Sustainable Outlook. http://www.packworld.com/newsletters/sp-11-14-07.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  64. SC Johnson & Son (2008) Doing what’s right: 2008 public report. Racine, WI

    Google Scholar 

  65. Reynolds P (2002) Superior Likes Caseless Shipping. Packworld. http://www.packworld.com/casestudy-14588. Accessed 15 Apr 2011

  66. Singh J, Krasowski A, Singh SP (2010) Life cycle inventory of HDPE bottle-based liquid milk packaging systems. Packag Technol Sci 24(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Samuelson A, Tilanus B (1997) A framework efficiency model for goods transportation, with an application to regional less-than-truckload distribution. Transport Logistics 1(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Palmer JM (2005) Level loading and cross docking in a global logistics network. S.M. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  69. Department for Transport (2007) Focus on double decks. Freight Best Practice Programme, HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  70. McKinnon AC (2000) Sustainable distribution: opportunities to improve vehicle loading. United Nations Environ Program Ind Environ 23(4):26–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, 1115 Etcheverry Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Rachel Simon & Yifen Chen

Authors
  1. Rachel Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yifen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Simon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Manufacturing, and Sustainability (LMAS), University of California, Berkeley, Etcheverry Hall 5100A, Berkeley, 94720-1740, California, USA

    David A. Dornfeld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, R., Chen, Y. (2013). Packaging and the Supply Chain: A Look at Transportation. In: Dornfeld, D. (eds) Green Manufacturing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6016-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6016-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6015-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6016-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation